Cargando…

Effect of innovative vs. usual care physical therapy in subacute rehabilitation after stroke. A multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Research on stroke rehabilitation often addresses common difficulties such as gait, balance or physical activity separately, a fragmentation contrasting the complexity in clinical practice. Interventions aiming for recovery are needed. The purpose of this study was to investigate effects...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sivertsen, Marianne, Arntzen, Ellen Christin, Alstadhaug, Karl Bjørnar, Normann, Britt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9673903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36407967
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2022.987601
_version_ 1784833047484432384
author Sivertsen, Marianne
Arntzen, Ellen Christin
Alstadhaug, Karl Bjørnar
Normann, Britt
author_facet Sivertsen, Marianne
Arntzen, Ellen Christin
Alstadhaug, Karl Bjørnar
Normann, Britt
author_sort Sivertsen, Marianne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Research on stroke rehabilitation often addresses common difficulties such as gait, balance or physical activity separately, a fragmentation contrasting the complexity in clinical practice. Interventions aiming for recovery are needed. The purpose of this study was to investigate effects of a comprehensive low-cost physical therapy intervention, I-CoreDIST, vs. usual care on postural control, balance, physical activity, gait and health related quality of life during the first 12 weeks post-stroke. METHODS: This prospective, assessor-masked randomized controlled trial included 60 participants from two stroke units in Norway. Participants, who were randomized to I-CoreDIST (n = 29) or usual care physical therapy (n = 31), received 5 sessions/week when in-patients or 3 sessions/week as out-patients. Primary outcomes were the Trunk Impairment Scale-modified Norwegian version (TISmodNV) and activity monitoring (ActiGraphsWgt3X-BT). Secondary outcomes were the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke, MiniBesTEST, 10-meter walk test, 2-minute walk test, force-platform measurements and EQ5D-3L. Stroke specific quality of life scale was administered at 12 weeks. Linear regression and non-parametric tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Five participants were excluded and seven lost to follow-up, leaving 48 participants in the intention-to-treat analysis. There were no significant between-group effects for primary outcomes: TIS-modNV (p = 0,857); daily average minutes of sedative (p = 0.662), light (p = 0.544) or moderate activity (p = 0.239) and steps (p = 0.288), or secondary outcomes at 12 weeks except for significant improvements on EQ5D-3L in the usual care group. Within-group changes were significant for all outcomes in both groups except for activity levels that were low, EQ5D-3L favoring the usual care group, and force-platform data favoring the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: Physical therapy treatment with I-CoreDIST improved postural control, balance, physical activity and gait during the first 12 weeks after a stroke but is not superior to usual care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9673903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96739032022-11-19 Effect of innovative vs. usual care physical therapy in subacute rehabilitation after stroke. A multicenter randomized controlled trial Sivertsen, Marianne Arntzen, Ellen Christin Alstadhaug, Karl Bjørnar Normann, Britt Front Rehabil Sci Rehabilitation Sciences BACKGROUND: Research on stroke rehabilitation often addresses common difficulties such as gait, balance or physical activity separately, a fragmentation contrasting the complexity in clinical practice. Interventions aiming for recovery are needed. The purpose of this study was to investigate effects of a comprehensive low-cost physical therapy intervention, I-CoreDIST, vs. usual care on postural control, balance, physical activity, gait and health related quality of life during the first 12 weeks post-stroke. METHODS: This prospective, assessor-masked randomized controlled trial included 60 participants from two stroke units in Norway. Participants, who were randomized to I-CoreDIST (n = 29) or usual care physical therapy (n = 31), received 5 sessions/week when in-patients or 3 sessions/week as out-patients. Primary outcomes were the Trunk Impairment Scale-modified Norwegian version (TISmodNV) and activity monitoring (ActiGraphsWgt3X-BT). Secondary outcomes were the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke, MiniBesTEST, 10-meter walk test, 2-minute walk test, force-platform measurements and EQ5D-3L. Stroke specific quality of life scale was administered at 12 weeks. Linear regression and non-parametric tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Five participants were excluded and seven lost to follow-up, leaving 48 participants in the intention-to-treat analysis. There were no significant between-group effects for primary outcomes: TIS-modNV (p = 0,857); daily average minutes of sedative (p = 0.662), light (p = 0.544) or moderate activity (p = 0.239) and steps (p = 0.288), or secondary outcomes at 12 weeks except for significant improvements on EQ5D-3L in the usual care group. Within-group changes were significant for all outcomes in both groups except for activity levels that were low, EQ5D-3L favoring the usual care group, and force-platform data favoring the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: Physical therapy treatment with I-CoreDIST improved postural control, balance, physical activity and gait during the first 12 weeks after a stroke but is not superior to usual care. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9673903/ /pubmed/36407967 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2022.987601 Text en © 2022 Sivertsen, Arntzen, Alstadhaug and Normann. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Sciences
Sivertsen, Marianne
Arntzen, Ellen Christin
Alstadhaug, Karl Bjørnar
Normann, Britt
Effect of innovative vs. usual care physical therapy in subacute rehabilitation after stroke. A multicenter randomized controlled trial
title Effect of innovative vs. usual care physical therapy in subacute rehabilitation after stroke. A multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_full Effect of innovative vs. usual care physical therapy in subacute rehabilitation after stroke. A multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Effect of innovative vs. usual care physical therapy in subacute rehabilitation after stroke. A multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect of innovative vs. usual care physical therapy in subacute rehabilitation after stroke. A multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_short Effect of innovative vs. usual care physical therapy in subacute rehabilitation after stroke. A multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_sort effect of innovative vs. usual care physical therapy in subacute rehabilitation after stroke. a multicenter randomized controlled trial
topic Rehabilitation Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9673903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36407967
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2022.987601
work_keys_str_mv AT sivertsenmarianne effectofinnovativevsusualcarephysicaltherapyinsubacuterehabilitationafterstrokeamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT arntzenellenchristin effectofinnovativevsusualcarephysicaltherapyinsubacuterehabilitationafterstrokeamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT alstadhaugkarlbjørnar effectofinnovativevsusualcarephysicaltherapyinsubacuterehabilitationafterstrokeamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT normannbritt effectofinnovativevsusualcarephysicaltherapyinsubacuterehabilitationafterstrokeamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial