Cargando…

Assessing effective radiative forcing from aerosol–cloud interactions over the global ocean

How clouds respond to anthropogenic sulfate aerosols is one of the largest sources of uncertainty in the radiative forcing of climate over the industrial era. This uncertainty limits our ability to predict equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS)—the equilibrium global warming following a doubling of a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wall, Casey J., Norris, Joel R., Possner, Anna, McCoy, Daniel T., McCoy, Isabel L., Lutsko, Nicholas J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9674239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36343255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2210481119
_version_ 1784833112837980160
author Wall, Casey J.
Norris, Joel R.
Possner, Anna
McCoy, Daniel T.
McCoy, Isabel L.
Lutsko, Nicholas J.
author_facet Wall, Casey J.
Norris, Joel R.
Possner, Anna
McCoy, Daniel T.
McCoy, Isabel L.
Lutsko, Nicholas J.
author_sort Wall, Casey J.
collection PubMed
description How clouds respond to anthropogenic sulfate aerosols is one of the largest sources of uncertainty in the radiative forcing of climate over the industrial era. This uncertainty limits our ability to predict equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS)—the equilibrium global warming following a doubling of atmospheric CO(2). Here, we use satellite observations to quantify relationships between sulfate aerosols and low-level clouds while carefully controlling for meteorology. We then combine the relationships with estimates of the change in sulfate concentration since about 1850 to constrain the associated radiative forcing. We estimate that the cloud-mediated radiative forcing from anthropogenic sulfate aerosols is [Formula: see text] W m(−2) over the global ocean (95% confidence). This constraint implies that ECS is likely between 2.9 and 4.5 K (66% confidence). Our results indicate that aerosol forcing is less uncertain and ECS is probably larger than the ranges proposed by recent climate assessments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9674239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96742392023-05-07 Assessing effective radiative forcing from aerosol–cloud interactions over the global ocean Wall, Casey J. Norris, Joel R. Possner, Anna McCoy, Daniel T. McCoy, Isabel L. Lutsko, Nicholas J. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Physical Sciences How clouds respond to anthropogenic sulfate aerosols is one of the largest sources of uncertainty in the radiative forcing of climate over the industrial era. This uncertainty limits our ability to predict equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS)—the equilibrium global warming following a doubling of atmospheric CO(2). Here, we use satellite observations to quantify relationships between sulfate aerosols and low-level clouds while carefully controlling for meteorology. We then combine the relationships with estimates of the change in sulfate concentration since about 1850 to constrain the associated radiative forcing. We estimate that the cloud-mediated radiative forcing from anthropogenic sulfate aerosols is [Formula: see text] W m(−2) over the global ocean (95% confidence). This constraint implies that ECS is likely between 2.9 and 4.5 K (66% confidence). Our results indicate that aerosol forcing is less uncertain and ECS is probably larger than the ranges proposed by recent climate assessments. National Academy of Sciences 2022-11-07 2022-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9674239/ /pubmed/36343255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2210481119 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Physical Sciences
Wall, Casey J.
Norris, Joel R.
Possner, Anna
McCoy, Daniel T.
McCoy, Isabel L.
Lutsko, Nicholas J.
Assessing effective radiative forcing from aerosol–cloud interactions over the global ocean
title Assessing effective radiative forcing from aerosol–cloud interactions over the global ocean
title_full Assessing effective radiative forcing from aerosol–cloud interactions over the global ocean
title_fullStr Assessing effective radiative forcing from aerosol–cloud interactions over the global ocean
title_full_unstemmed Assessing effective radiative forcing from aerosol–cloud interactions over the global ocean
title_short Assessing effective radiative forcing from aerosol–cloud interactions over the global ocean
title_sort assessing effective radiative forcing from aerosol–cloud interactions over the global ocean
topic Physical Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9674239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36343255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2210481119
work_keys_str_mv AT wallcaseyj assessingeffectiveradiativeforcingfromaerosolcloudinteractionsovertheglobalocean
AT norrisjoelr assessingeffectiveradiativeforcingfromaerosolcloudinteractionsovertheglobalocean
AT possneranna assessingeffectiveradiativeforcingfromaerosolcloudinteractionsovertheglobalocean
AT mccoydanielt assessingeffectiveradiativeforcingfromaerosolcloudinteractionsovertheglobalocean
AT mccoyisabell assessingeffectiveradiativeforcingfromaerosolcloudinteractionsovertheglobalocean
AT lutskonicholasj assessingeffectiveradiativeforcingfromaerosolcloudinteractionsovertheglobalocean