Cargando…

A Cohort Study of Surgical Indexes, Postoperative Complications, Recovery Speed, and Prognosis of Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection Compared with Traditional Sun's Operation

OBJECTIVE: The objective is to explore the surgical index, postoperative complications, recovery speed, and prognosis of Stanford type A aortic dissection (AD) compared with traditional 'Sun's operation. METHODS: One hundred patients with Stanford type A AD treated from February 2018 to Fe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feng, Yiqing, Ren, Jianli, Zhang, Yihe, Liu, Hu, Ma, Xingxing, Guo, Jing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9674412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36408346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9516922
_version_ 1784833146867417088
author Feng, Yiqing
Ren, Jianli
Zhang, Yihe
Liu, Hu
Ma, Xingxing
Guo, Jing
author_facet Feng, Yiqing
Ren, Jianli
Zhang, Yihe
Liu, Hu
Ma, Xingxing
Guo, Jing
author_sort Feng, Yiqing
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective is to explore the surgical index, postoperative complications, recovery speed, and prognosis of Stanford type A aortic dissection (AD) compared with traditional 'Sun's operation. METHODS: One hundred patients with Stanford type A AD treated from February 2018 to February 2021 were enrolled in our hospital. Patients were randomly divided into control and research group. The former group underwent traditional Sun's surgery, and the latter group underwent combined debranching surgery. The general data, surgical indexes, total amount of blood transfusion, renal function 72 hours after operation, postoperative indexes during hospitalization, and follow-up results after discharge were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The CPB time, ACC time, operation time, and postoperative total drainage volume of the study group were all lower than those of the control group, and the intraoperative urine volume of the study group was higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The total amount of RBC infused in the study group was higher than that in the control group, while the total amount of PLT, cryoprecipitate, and plasma infusion in the study group was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). At 72 hours after operation, BUN, Scr, and UA in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The number of the secondary intubation, hemodialysis, neurological complications, and deaths in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both Sun's operation and branch removal are more effective treatment methods, and the two different surgical methods have different indications, advantages, and disadvantages, so different surgical methods can be chosen according to different conditions for Stanford AD. The possible postoperative complications should be comprehensively analyzed in the clinical work in order to reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications and improve the cure rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9674412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96744122022-11-19 A Cohort Study of Surgical Indexes, Postoperative Complications, Recovery Speed, and Prognosis of Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection Compared with Traditional Sun's Operation Feng, Yiqing Ren, Jianli Zhang, Yihe Liu, Hu Ma, Xingxing Guo, Jing Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Research Article OBJECTIVE: The objective is to explore the surgical index, postoperative complications, recovery speed, and prognosis of Stanford type A aortic dissection (AD) compared with traditional 'Sun's operation. METHODS: One hundred patients with Stanford type A AD treated from February 2018 to February 2021 were enrolled in our hospital. Patients were randomly divided into control and research group. The former group underwent traditional Sun's surgery, and the latter group underwent combined debranching surgery. The general data, surgical indexes, total amount of blood transfusion, renal function 72 hours after operation, postoperative indexes during hospitalization, and follow-up results after discharge were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The CPB time, ACC time, operation time, and postoperative total drainage volume of the study group were all lower than those of the control group, and the intraoperative urine volume of the study group was higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The total amount of RBC infused in the study group was higher than that in the control group, while the total amount of PLT, cryoprecipitate, and plasma infusion in the study group was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). At 72 hours after operation, BUN, Scr, and UA in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The number of the secondary intubation, hemodialysis, neurological complications, and deaths in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both Sun's operation and branch removal are more effective treatment methods, and the two different surgical methods have different indications, advantages, and disadvantages, so different surgical methods can be chosen according to different conditions for Stanford AD. The possible postoperative complications should be comprehensively analyzed in the clinical work in order to reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications and improve the cure rate. Hindawi 2022-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9674412/ /pubmed/36408346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9516922 Text en Copyright © 2022 Yiqing Feng et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Feng, Yiqing
Ren, Jianli
Zhang, Yihe
Liu, Hu
Ma, Xingxing
Guo, Jing
A Cohort Study of Surgical Indexes, Postoperative Complications, Recovery Speed, and Prognosis of Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection Compared with Traditional Sun's Operation
title A Cohort Study of Surgical Indexes, Postoperative Complications, Recovery Speed, and Prognosis of Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection Compared with Traditional Sun's Operation
title_full A Cohort Study of Surgical Indexes, Postoperative Complications, Recovery Speed, and Prognosis of Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection Compared with Traditional Sun's Operation
title_fullStr A Cohort Study of Surgical Indexes, Postoperative Complications, Recovery Speed, and Prognosis of Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection Compared with Traditional Sun's Operation
title_full_unstemmed A Cohort Study of Surgical Indexes, Postoperative Complications, Recovery Speed, and Prognosis of Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection Compared with Traditional Sun's Operation
title_short A Cohort Study of Surgical Indexes, Postoperative Complications, Recovery Speed, and Prognosis of Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection Compared with Traditional Sun's Operation
title_sort cohort study of surgical indexes, postoperative complications, recovery speed, and prognosis of stanford type a aortic dissection compared with traditional sun's operation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9674412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36408346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9516922
work_keys_str_mv AT fengyiqing acohortstudyofsurgicalindexespostoperativecomplicationsrecoveryspeedandprognosisofstanfordtypeaaorticdissectioncomparedwithtraditionalsunsoperation
AT renjianli acohortstudyofsurgicalindexespostoperativecomplicationsrecoveryspeedandprognosisofstanfordtypeaaorticdissectioncomparedwithtraditionalsunsoperation
AT zhangyihe acohortstudyofsurgicalindexespostoperativecomplicationsrecoveryspeedandprognosisofstanfordtypeaaorticdissectioncomparedwithtraditionalsunsoperation
AT liuhu acohortstudyofsurgicalindexespostoperativecomplicationsrecoveryspeedandprognosisofstanfordtypeaaorticdissectioncomparedwithtraditionalsunsoperation
AT maxingxing acohortstudyofsurgicalindexespostoperativecomplicationsrecoveryspeedandprognosisofstanfordtypeaaorticdissectioncomparedwithtraditionalsunsoperation
AT guojing acohortstudyofsurgicalindexespostoperativecomplicationsrecoveryspeedandprognosisofstanfordtypeaaorticdissectioncomparedwithtraditionalsunsoperation
AT fengyiqing cohortstudyofsurgicalindexespostoperativecomplicationsrecoveryspeedandprognosisofstanfordtypeaaorticdissectioncomparedwithtraditionalsunsoperation
AT renjianli cohortstudyofsurgicalindexespostoperativecomplicationsrecoveryspeedandprognosisofstanfordtypeaaorticdissectioncomparedwithtraditionalsunsoperation
AT zhangyihe cohortstudyofsurgicalindexespostoperativecomplicationsrecoveryspeedandprognosisofstanfordtypeaaorticdissectioncomparedwithtraditionalsunsoperation
AT liuhu cohortstudyofsurgicalindexespostoperativecomplicationsrecoveryspeedandprognosisofstanfordtypeaaorticdissectioncomparedwithtraditionalsunsoperation
AT maxingxing cohortstudyofsurgicalindexespostoperativecomplicationsrecoveryspeedandprognosisofstanfordtypeaaorticdissectioncomparedwithtraditionalsunsoperation
AT guojing cohortstudyofsurgicalindexespostoperativecomplicationsrecoveryspeedandprognosisofstanfordtypeaaorticdissectioncomparedwithtraditionalsunsoperation