Cargando…
Power-assisted Liposuction for Lymphedema: A Cost-utility Analysis
Lymphedema is a chronic, debilitating disease that has been described as the largest breast cancer survivorship burden. Debulking surgery has been shown to improve extremity volume, improve patient quality of life, and decrease the incidence of cellulitis in the literature. This procedure is routine...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9674478/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36415620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004671 |
_version_ | 1784833162083303424 |
---|---|
author | Bloom, Joshua A. Granoff, Melisa Karlsson, Tobias Greene, Arin K. Brorson, Håkan Chatterjee, Abhishek Singhal, Dhruv |
author_facet | Bloom, Joshua A. Granoff, Melisa Karlsson, Tobias Greene, Arin K. Brorson, Håkan Chatterjee, Abhishek Singhal, Dhruv |
author_sort | Bloom, Joshua A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lymphedema is a chronic, debilitating disease that has been described as the largest breast cancer survivorship burden. Debulking surgery has been shown to improve extremity volume, improve patient quality of life, and decrease the incidence of cellulitis in the literature. This procedure is routinely covered in numerous other developed countries, yet it is still inconsistently covered in the United States. METHODS: Extremity volumes from all patients who underwent debulking surgery of the upper extremity at two institutions between December 2017 and January 2020 with at least 12 months follow-up were included. Procedural costs were calculated using Medicare reimbursement data. Average utility scores were obtained for each health state using a visual analog scale, then converted to quality-adjusted life years. A decision tree was generated, and incremental cost-utility ratios were calculated. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate our findings. RESULTS: Debulking surgery is associated with a higher clinical effectiveness (quality-adjusted life year) of 27.05 compared to conservative management (23.34), with a relative cost reduction of $74,487. Rollback analysis favored debulking surgery as the cost-effective option compared to conservative management. The resulting negative incremental cost-utility ratio of −20,115.07 favored debulking surgery and indicated a dominant strategy. CONCLUSION: Our study supports the use of debulking surgery for the treatment of chronic lymphedema of the upper extremity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9674478 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96744782022-11-21 Power-assisted Liposuction for Lymphedema: A Cost-utility Analysis Bloom, Joshua A. Granoff, Melisa Karlsson, Tobias Greene, Arin K. Brorson, Håkan Chatterjee, Abhishek Singhal, Dhruv Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Breast Lymphedema is a chronic, debilitating disease that has been described as the largest breast cancer survivorship burden. Debulking surgery has been shown to improve extremity volume, improve patient quality of life, and decrease the incidence of cellulitis in the literature. This procedure is routinely covered in numerous other developed countries, yet it is still inconsistently covered in the United States. METHODS: Extremity volumes from all patients who underwent debulking surgery of the upper extremity at two institutions between December 2017 and January 2020 with at least 12 months follow-up were included. Procedural costs were calculated using Medicare reimbursement data. Average utility scores were obtained for each health state using a visual analog scale, then converted to quality-adjusted life years. A decision tree was generated, and incremental cost-utility ratios were calculated. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate our findings. RESULTS: Debulking surgery is associated with a higher clinical effectiveness (quality-adjusted life year) of 27.05 compared to conservative management (23.34), with a relative cost reduction of $74,487. Rollback analysis favored debulking surgery as the cost-effective option compared to conservative management. The resulting negative incremental cost-utility ratio of −20,115.07 favored debulking surgery and indicated a dominant strategy. CONCLUSION: Our study supports the use of debulking surgery for the treatment of chronic lymphedema of the upper extremity. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9674478/ /pubmed/36415620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004671 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Breast Bloom, Joshua A. Granoff, Melisa Karlsson, Tobias Greene, Arin K. Brorson, Håkan Chatterjee, Abhishek Singhal, Dhruv Power-assisted Liposuction for Lymphedema: A Cost-utility Analysis |
title | Power-assisted Liposuction for Lymphedema: A Cost-utility Analysis |
title_full | Power-assisted Liposuction for Lymphedema: A Cost-utility Analysis |
title_fullStr | Power-assisted Liposuction for Lymphedema: A Cost-utility Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Power-assisted Liposuction for Lymphedema: A Cost-utility Analysis |
title_short | Power-assisted Liposuction for Lymphedema: A Cost-utility Analysis |
title_sort | power-assisted liposuction for lymphedema: a cost-utility analysis |
topic | Breast |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9674478/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36415620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004671 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bloomjoshuaa powerassistedliposuctionforlymphedemaacostutilityanalysis AT granoffmelisa powerassistedliposuctionforlymphedemaacostutilityanalysis AT karlssontobias powerassistedliposuctionforlymphedemaacostutilityanalysis AT greenearink powerassistedliposuctionforlymphedemaacostutilityanalysis AT brorsonhakan powerassistedliposuctionforlymphedemaacostutilityanalysis AT chatterjeeabhishek powerassistedliposuctionforlymphedemaacostutilityanalysis AT singhaldhruv powerassistedliposuctionforlymphedemaacostutilityanalysis |