Cargando…

Power-assisted Liposuction for Lymphedema: A Cost-utility Analysis

Lymphedema is a chronic, debilitating disease that has been described as the largest breast cancer survivorship burden. Debulking surgery has been shown to improve extremity volume, improve patient quality of life, and decrease the incidence of cellulitis in the literature. This procedure is routine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bloom, Joshua A., Granoff, Melisa, Karlsson, Tobias, Greene, Arin K., Brorson, Håkan, Chatterjee, Abhishek, Singhal, Dhruv
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9674478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36415620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004671
_version_ 1784833162083303424
author Bloom, Joshua A.
Granoff, Melisa
Karlsson, Tobias
Greene, Arin K.
Brorson, Håkan
Chatterjee, Abhishek
Singhal, Dhruv
author_facet Bloom, Joshua A.
Granoff, Melisa
Karlsson, Tobias
Greene, Arin K.
Brorson, Håkan
Chatterjee, Abhishek
Singhal, Dhruv
author_sort Bloom, Joshua A.
collection PubMed
description Lymphedema is a chronic, debilitating disease that has been described as the largest breast cancer survivorship burden. Debulking surgery has been shown to improve extremity volume, improve patient quality of life, and decrease the incidence of cellulitis in the literature. This procedure is routinely covered in numerous other developed countries, yet it is still inconsistently covered in the United States. METHODS: Extremity volumes from all patients who underwent debulking surgery of the upper extremity at two institutions between December 2017 and January 2020 with at least 12 months follow-up were included. Procedural costs were calculated using Medicare reimbursement data. Average utility scores were obtained for each health state using a visual analog scale, then converted to quality-adjusted life years. A decision tree was generated, and incremental cost-utility ratios were calculated. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate our findings. RESULTS: Debulking surgery is associated with a higher clinical effectiveness (quality-adjusted life year) of 27.05 compared to conservative management (23.34), with a relative cost reduction of $74,487. Rollback analysis favored debulking surgery as the cost-effective option compared to conservative management. The resulting negative incremental cost-utility ratio of −20,115.07 favored debulking surgery and indicated a dominant strategy. CONCLUSION: Our study supports the use of debulking surgery for the treatment of chronic lymphedema of the upper extremity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9674478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96744782022-11-21 Power-assisted Liposuction for Lymphedema: A Cost-utility Analysis Bloom, Joshua A. Granoff, Melisa Karlsson, Tobias Greene, Arin K. Brorson, Håkan Chatterjee, Abhishek Singhal, Dhruv Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Breast Lymphedema is a chronic, debilitating disease that has been described as the largest breast cancer survivorship burden. Debulking surgery has been shown to improve extremity volume, improve patient quality of life, and decrease the incidence of cellulitis in the literature. This procedure is routinely covered in numerous other developed countries, yet it is still inconsistently covered in the United States. METHODS: Extremity volumes from all patients who underwent debulking surgery of the upper extremity at two institutions between December 2017 and January 2020 with at least 12 months follow-up were included. Procedural costs were calculated using Medicare reimbursement data. Average utility scores were obtained for each health state using a visual analog scale, then converted to quality-adjusted life years. A decision tree was generated, and incremental cost-utility ratios were calculated. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate our findings. RESULTS: Debulking surgery is associated with a higher clinical effectiveness (quality-adjusted life year) of 27.05 compared to conservative management (23.34), with a relative cost reduction of $74,487. Rollback analysis favored debulking surgery as the cost-effective option compared to conservative management. The resulting negative incremental cost-utility ratio of −20,115.07 favored debulking surgery and indicated a dominant strategy. CONCLUSION: Our study supports the use of debulking surgery for the treatment of chronic lymphedema of the upper extremity. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9674478/ /pubmed/36415620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004671 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Breast
Bloom, Joshua A.
Granoff, Melisa
Karlsson, Tobias
Greene, Arin K.
Brorson, Håkan
Chatterjee, Abhishek
Singhal, Dhruv
Power-assisted Liposuction for Lymphedema: A Cost-utility Analysis
title Power-assisted Liposuction for Lymphedema: A Cost-utility Analysis
title_full Power-assisted Liposuction for Lymphedema: A Cost-utility Analysis
title_fullStr Power-assisted Liposuction for Lymphedema: A Cost-utility Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Power-assisted Liposuction for Lymphedema: A Cost-utility Analysis
title_short Power-assisted Liposuction for Lymphedema: A Cost-utility Analysis
title_sort power-assisted liposuction for lymphedema: a cost-utility analysis
topic Breast
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9674478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36415620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004671
work_keys_str_mv AT bloomjoshuaa powerassistedliposuctionforlymphedemaacostutilityanalysis
AT granoffmelisa powerassistedliposuctionforlymphedemaacostutilityanalysis
AT karlssontobias powerassistedliposuctionforlymphedemaacostutilityanalysis
AT greenearink powerassistedliposuctionforlymphedemaacostutilityanalysis
AT brorsonhakan powerassistedliposuctionforlymphedemaacostutilityanalysis
AT chatterjeeabhishek powerassistedliposuctionforlymphedemaacostutilityanalysis
AT singhaldhruv powerassistedliposuctionforlymphedemaacostutilityanalysis