Cargando…

Comparison of the performance of two real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR kits for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid: a study based on large real clinical samples

BACKGROUND: The global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to the development of multiple detection kits by national manufacturers for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 viral nucleic acid testing. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of different...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yiting, Li, Xuewen, Wang, Yifei, Tu, Zheyu, Xu, Jiancheng, Pan, Junqi, Zhou, Qi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9675236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36401275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12985-022-01922-y
_version_ 1784833328401088512
author Wang, Yiting
Li, Xuewen
Wang, Yifei
Tu, Zheyu
Xu, Jiancheng
Pan, Junqi
Zhou, Qi
author_facet Wang, Yiting
Li, Xuewen
Wang, Yifei
Tu, Zheyu
Xu, Jiancheng
Pan, Junqi
Zhou, Qi
author_sort Wang, Yiting
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to the development of multiple detection kits by national manufacturers for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 viral nucleic acid testing. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of different kits (i.e., Maccura kit and Sansure kit) in real clinical work using clinical samples, which will help with the optimization of the test kits. METHOD: During the past three months (March–May 2022), 1399 pharyngeal swabs from suspected COVID-19 patients have been initially screened using the Maccura kit in Jilin, China, and the test results were verified using the Sansure kit. The cycle threshold (Ct) values generated by the two kits were compared at different viral load levels. Correlation and consistency of the Ct values were investigated using Spearman correlation, Deming regression, and Bland–Altman plots. The cut-off Ct values of the Maccura kit were recalculated by referencing the result of the Sansure kit as a standard. Furthermore, another 163 pharyngeal swabs from suspected COVID-19 patients were collected to verify the new cut-off values. RESULTS: As a result of the Maccura kit testing, 1192 positive cases and 207 suspected COVID-19 cases were verified. After re-examination by the Sansure kit, 1118 positive cases were confirmed. The difference between the Ct values provided by the two kits was statistically significant, except for the N gene at high viral load. The Ct values obtained from the two kits presented a linear positive correlation. The Maccura kit used new cut-off Ct values of 35.00 (ORF1ab gene) and 35.07 (N gene). Based on that, the validation pass rate for the new cut-off Ct values was 91.41%. CONCLUSION: Since the Maccura kit is found to have false positives in actual clinical work, recalculation of the cut-off values can reduce this occurrence. In order to improve the accuracy of the testing, laboratories should use two kits for COVID-19 testing, and the adjusting and optimizing of the kits for their situation are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9675236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96752362022-11-20 Comparison of the performance of two real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR kits for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid: a study based on large real clinical samples Wang, Yiting Li, Xuewen Wang, Yifei Tu, Zheyu Xu, Jiancheng Pan, Junqi Zhou, Qi Virol J Research BACKGROUND: The global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to the development of multiple detection kits by national manufacturers for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 viral nucleic acid testing. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of different kits (i.e., Maccura kit and Sansure kit) in real clinical work using clinical samples, which will help with the optimization of the test kits. METHOD: During the past three months (March–May 2022), 1399 pharyngeal swabs from suspected COVID-19 patients have been initially screened using the Maccura kit in Jilin, China, and the test results were verified using the Sansure kit. The cycle threshold (Ct) values generated by the two kits were compared at different viral load levels. Correlation and consistency of the Ct values were investigated using Spearman correlation, Deming regression, and Bland–Altman plots. The cut-off Ct values of the Maccura kit were recalculated by referencing the result of the Sansure kit as a standard. Furthermore, another 163 pharyngeal swabs from suspected COVID-19 patients were collected to verify the new cut-off values. RESULTS: As a result of the Maccura kit testing, 1192 positive cases and 207 suspected COVID-19 cases were verified. After re-examination by the Sansure kit, 1118 positive cases were confirmed. The difference between the Ct values provided by the two kits was statistically significant, except for the N gene at high viral load. The Ct values obtained from the two kits presented a linear positive correlation. The Maccura kit used new cut-off Ct values of 35.00 (ORF1ab gene) and 35.07 (N gene). Based on that, the validation pass rate for the new cut-off Ct values was 91.41%. CONCLUSION: Since the Maccura kit is found to have false positives in actual clinical work, recalculation of the cut-off values can reduce this occurrence. In order to improve the accuracy of the testing, laboratories should use two kits for COVID-19 testing, and the adjusting and optimizing of the kits for their situation are needed. BioMed Central 2022-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9675236/ /pubmed/36401275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12985-022-01922-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wang, Yiting
Li, Xuewen
Wang, Yifei
Tu, Zheyu
Xu, Jiancheng
Pan, Junqi
Zhou, Qi
Comparison of the performance of two real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR kits for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid: a study based on large real clinical samples
title Comparison of the performance of two real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR kits for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid: a study based on large real clinical samples
title_full Comparison of the performance of two real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR kits for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid: a study based on large real clinical samples
title_fullStr Comparison of the performance of two real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR kits for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid: a study based on large real clinical samples
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the performance of two real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR kits for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid: a study based on large real clinical samples
title_short Comparison of the performance of two real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR kits for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid: a study based on large real clinical samples
title_sort comparison of the performance of two real-time fluorescent quantitative pcr kits for the detection of sars-cov-2 nucleic acid: a study based on large real clinical samples
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9675236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36401275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12985-022-01922-y
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyiting comparisonoftheperformanceoftworealtimefluorescentquantitativepcrkitsforthedetectionofsarscov2nucleicacidastudybasedonlargerealclinicalsamples
AT lixuewen comparisonoftheperformanceoftworealtimefluorescentquantitativepcrkitsforthedetectionofsarscov2nucleicacidastudybasedonlargerealclinicalsamples
AT wangyifei comparisonoftheperformanceoftworealtimefluorescentquantitativepcrkitsforthedetectionofsarscov2nucleicacidastudybasedonlargerealclinicalsamples
AT tuzheyu comparisonoftheperformanceoftworealtimefluorescentquantitativepcrkitsforthedetectionofsarscov2nucleicacidastudybasedonlargerealclinicalsamples
AT xujiancheng comparisonoftheperformanceoftworealtimefluorescentquantitativepcrkitsforthedetectionofsarscov2nucleicacidastudybasedonlargerealclinicalsamples
AT panjunqi comparisonoftheperformanceoftworealtimefluorescentquantitativepcrkitsforthedetectionofsarscov2nucleicacidastudybasedonlargerealclinicalsamples
AT zhouqi comparisonoftheperformanceoftworealtimefluorescentquantitativepcrkitsforthedetectionofsarscov2nucleicacidastudybasedonlargerealclinicalsamples