Cargando…
Development and evaluation of a pediatric hospital medicine board review course
BACKGROUND: The American Board of Medical Specialties recognized Pediatric Hospital Medicine (PHM) for subspecialty certification in 2016, with the first certification exam in 2019. To address the need for exam preparatory materials, we designed and evaluated a novel PHM board review course that was...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9675241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36402975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03862-1 |
_version_ | 1784833329630019584 |
---|---|
author | Herrmann, Lisa E. Jones, Yemisi O. Kinnear, Benjamin Rule, Amy Piper, Laura Shah, Samir S. Klein, Melissa |
author_facet | Herrmann, Lisa E. Jones, Yemisi O. Kinnear, Benjamin Rule, Amy Piper, Laura Shah, Samir S. Klein, Melissa |
author_sort | Herrmann, Lisa E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The American Board of Medical Specialties recognized Pediatric Hospital Medicine (PHM) for subspecialty certification in 2016, with the first certification exam in 2019. To address the need for exam preparatory materials, we designed and evaluated a novel PHM board review course that was offered both in-person and online. METHODS: Course content was based on the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) PHM certifying exam outline. Course objectives were developed from published PHM core competencies and the 2012 ABP general pediatrics content objectives. National experts served as faculty, presenting didactic sessions, and contributing to a question bank for high-yield review. For program evaluation, we applied the Kirkpatrick Model, evaluating estimated exam pass rates (Level 4), participant learning (Level 2) via post-presentation practice questions, and participants’ ratings of presenters (via five-point Likert scale) and satisfaction (Level 1). RESULTS: There were 112 in-person and 144 online participants with estimated pass rates of 89 and 93%, respectively. The mean correct response for the post-presentation knowledge questions was 84%. Faculty effectiveness ratings ranged from 3.81 to 4.96 (median score 4.60). Strengths included the pace of the course, question bank, and printed syllabus. Suggestions for improvement included question bank expansion, focus on “testable” points rather than general information, and challenges with long days of didactic presentations. CONCLUSIONS: This novel PHM board review course demonstrated effectiveness. Hospitalists preferred focused “testable” information, an active learning environment, and a robust question bank. Future preparatory courses should consider including more opportunities for practice questions, focused content review, and learner engagement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03862-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9675241 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96752412022-11-20 Development and evaluation of a pediatric hospital medicine board review course Herrmann, Lisa E. Jones, Yemisi O. Kinnear, Benjamin Rule, Amy Piper, Laura Shah, Samir S. Klein, Melissa BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: The American Board of Medical Specialties recognized Pediatric Hospital Medicine (PHM) for subspecialty certification in 2016, with the first certification exam in 2019. To address the need for exam preparatory materials, we designed and evaluated a novel PHM board review course that was offered both in-person and online. METHODS: Course content was based on the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) PHM certifying exam outline. Course objectives were developed from published PHM core competencies and the 2012 ABP general pediatrics content objectives. National experts served as faculty, presenting didactic sessions, and contributing to a question bank for high-yield review. For program evaluation, we applied the Kirkpatrick Model, evaluating estimated exam pass rates (Level 4), participant learning (Level 2) via post-presentation practice questions, and participants’ ratings of presenters (via five-point Likert scale) and satisfaction (Level 1). RESULTS: There were 112 in-person and 144 online participants with estimated pass rates of 89 and 93%, respectively. The mean correct response for the post-presentation knowledge questions was 84%. Faculty effectiveness ratings ranged from 3.81 to 4.96 (median score 4.60). Strengths included the pace of the course, question bank, and printed syllabus. Suggestions for improvement included question bank expansion, focus on “testable” points rather than general information, and challenges with long days of didactic presentations. CONCLUSIONS: This novel PHM board review course demonstrated effectiveness. Hospitalists preferred focused “testable” information, an active learning environment, and a robust question bank. Future preparatory courses should consider including more opportunities for practice questions, focused content review, and learner engagement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03862-1. BioMed Central 2022-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9675241/ /pubmed/36402975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03862-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Herrmann, Lisa E. Jones, Yemisi O. Kinnear, Benjamin Rule, Amy Piper, Laura Shah, Samir S. Klein, Melissa Development and evaluation of a pediatric hospital medicine board review course |
title | Development and evaluation of a pediatric hospital medicine board review course |
title_full | Development and evaluation of a pediatric hospital medicine board review course |
title_fullStr | Development and evaluation of a pediatric hospital medicine board review course |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and evaluation of a pediatric hospital medicine board review course |
title_short | Development and evaluation of a pediatric hospital medicine board review course |
title_sort | development and evaluation of a pediatric hospital medicine board review course |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9675241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36402975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03862-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT herrmannlisae developmentandevaluationofapediatrichospitalmedicineboardreviewcourse AT jonesyemisio developmentandevaluationofapediatrichospitalmedicineboardreviewcourse AT kinnearbenjamin developmentandevaluationofapediatrichospitalmedicineboardreviewcourse AT ruleamy developmentandevaluationofapediatrichospitalmedicineboardreviewcourse AT piperlaura developmentandevaluationofapediatrichospitalmedicineboardreviewcourse AT shahsamirs developmentandevaluationofapediatrichospitalmedicineboardreviewcourse AT kleinmelissa developmentandevaluationofapediatrichospitalmedicineboardreviewcourse |