Cargando…

Development and evaluation of a pediatric hospital medicine board review course

BACKGROUND: The American Board of Medical Specialties recognized Pediatric Hospital Medicine (PHM) for subspecialty certification in 2016, with the first certification exam in 2019. To address the need for exam preparatory materials, we designed and evaluated a novel PHM board review course that was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herrmann, Lisa E., Jones, Yemisi O., Kinnear, Benjamin, Rule, Amy, Piper, Laura, Shah, Samir S., Klein, Melissa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9675241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36402975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03862-1
_version_ 1784833329630019584
author Herrmann, Lisa E.
Jones, Yemisi O.
Kinnear, Benjamin
Rule, Amy
Piper, Laura
Shah, Samir S.
Klein, Melissa
author_facet Herrmann, Lisa E.
Jones, Yemisi O.
Kinnear, Benjamin
Rule, Amy
Piper, Laura
Shah, Samir S.
Klein, Melissa
author_sort Herrmann, Lisa E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The American Board of Medical Specialties recognized Pediatric Hospital Medicine (PHM) for subspecialty certification in 2016, with the first certification exam in 2019. To address the need for exam preparatory materials, we designed and evaluated a novel PHM board review course that was offered both in-person and online. METHODS: Course content was based on the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) PHM certifying exam outline. Course objectives were developed from published PHM core competencies and the 2012 ABP general pediatrics content objectives. National experts served as faculty, presenting didactic sessions, and contributing to a question bank for high-yield review. For program evaluation, we applied the Kirkpatrick Model, evaluating estimated exam pass rates (Level 4), participant learning (Level 2) via post-presentation practice questions, and participants’ ratings of presenters (via five-point Likert scale) and satisfaction (Level 1). RESULTS: There were 112 in-person and 144 online participants with estimated pass rates of 89 and 93%, respectively. The mean correct response for the post-presentation knowledge questions was 84%. Faculty effectiveness ratings ranged from 3.81 to 4.96 (median score 4.60). Strengths included the pace of the course, question bank, and printed syllabus. Suggestions for improvement included question bank expansion, focus on “testable” points rather than general information, and challenges with long days of didactic presentations. CONCLUSIONS: This novel PHM board review course demonstrated effectiveness. Hospitalists preferred focused “testable” information, an active learning environment, and a robust question bank. Future preparatory courses should consider including more opportunities for practice questions, focused content review, and learner engagement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03862-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9675241
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96752412022-11-20 Development and evaluation of a pediatric hospital medicine board review course Herrmann, Lisa E. Jones, Yemisi O. Kinnear, Benjamin Rule, Amy Piper, Laura Shah, Samir S. Klein, Melissa BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: The American Board of Medical Specialties recognized Pediatric Hospital Medicine (PHM) for subspecialty certification in 2016, with the first certification exam in 2019. To address the need for exam preparatory materials, we designed and evaluated a novel PHM board review course that was offered both in-person and online. METHODS: Course content was based on the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) PHM certifying exam outline. Course objectives were developed from published PHM core competencies and the 2012 ABP general pediatrics content objectives. National experts served as faculty, presenting didactic sessions, and contributing to a question bank for high-yield review. For program evaluation, we applied the Kirkpatrick Model, evaluating estimated exam pass rates (Level 4), participant learning (Level 2) via post-presentation practice questions, and participants’ ratings of presenters (via five-point Likert scale) and satisfaction (Level 1). RESULTS: There were 112 in-person and 144 online participants with estimated pass rates of 89 and 93%, respectively. The mean correct response for the post-presentation knowledge questions was 84%. Faculty effectiveness ratings ranged from 3.81 to 4.96 (median score 4.60). Strengths included the pace of the course, question bank, and printed syllabus. Suggestions for improvement included question bank expansion, focus on “testable” points rather than general information, and challenges with long days of didactic presentations. CONCLUSIONS: This novel PHM board review course demonstrated effectiveness. Hospitalists preferred focused “testable” information, an active learning environment, and a robust question bank. Future preparatory courses should consider including more opportunities for practice questions, focused content review, and learner engagement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03862-1. BioMed Central 2022-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9675241/ /pubmed/36402975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03862-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Herrmann, Lisa E.
Jones, Yemisi O.
Kinnear, Benjamin
Rule, Amy
Piper, Laura
Shah, Samir S.
Klein, Melissa
Development and evaluation of a pediatric hospital medicine board review course
title Development and evaluation of a pediatric hospital medicine board review course
title_full Development and evaluation of a pediatric hospital medicine board review course
title_fullStr Development and evaluation of a pediatric hospital medicine board review course
title_full_unstemmed Development and evaluation of a pediatric hospital medicine board review course
title_short Development and evaluation of a pediatric hospital medicine board review course
title_sort development and evaluation of a pediatric hospital medicine board review course
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9675241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36402975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03862-1
work_keys_str_mv AT herrmannlisae developmentandevaluationofapediatrichospitalmedicineboardreviewcourse
AT jonesyemisio developmentandevaluationofapediatrichospitalmedicineboardreviewcourse
AT kinnearbenjamin developmentandevaluationofapediatrichospitalmedicineboardreviewcourse
AT ruleamy developmentandevaluationofapediatrichospitalmedicineboardreviewcourse
AT piperlaura developmentandevaluationofapediatrichospitalmedicineboardreviewcourse
AT shahsamirs developmentandevaluationofapediatrichospitalmedicineboardreviewcourse
AT kleinmelissa developmentandevaluationofapediatrichospitalmedicineboardreviewcourse