Cargando…

Regional differences in treatment and outcome for myeloma patients in Sweden: A population based Swedish myeloma register study

BACKGROUND: We wanted to evaluate if health care for multiple myeloma (MM) patients is equal in different regions of Sweden. AIM: To study differences in survival for MM depending on health care region and early use of modern treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from the Swedish Myeloma Register fro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wålinder, Göran, Genell, Anna, Juliusson, Gunnar, Svensson, Ronald, Santamaria, Antonio Izarra, Crafoord, Jacob, Carlson, Kristina, Knut‐Bojanowska, Dorota, Veskovski, Ljupco, Lauri, Birgitta, Lund, Johan, Turesson, Ingemar, Hansson, Markus, Blimark, Cecilie Hveding, Nahi, Hareth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9675390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35243814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1614
_version_ 1784833364344176640
author Wålinder, Göran
Genell, Anna
Juliusson, Gunnar
Svensson, Ronald
Santamaria, Antonio Izarra
Crafoord, Jacob
Carlson, Kristina
Knut‐Bojanowska, Dorota
Veskovski, Ljupco
Lauri, Birgitta
Lund, Johan
Turesson, Ingemar
Hansson, Markus
Blimark, Cecilie Hveding
Nahi, Hareth
author_facet Wålinder, Göran
Genell, Anna
Juliusson, Gunnar
Svensson, Ronald
Santamaria, Antonio Izarra
Crafoord, Jacob
Carlson, Kristina
Knut‐Bojanowska, Dorota
Veskovski, Ljupco
Lauri, Birgitta
Lund, Johan
Turesson, Ingemar
Hansson, Markus
Blimark, Cecilie Hveding
Nahi, Hareth
author_sort Wålinder, Göran
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We wanted to evaluate if health care for multiple myeloma (MM) patients is equal in different regions of Sweden. AIM: To study differences in survival for MM depending on health care region and early use of modern treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from the Swedish Myeloma Register from patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2017 was used. Cohorts were defined by the six healthcare regions (labeled A–F) in Sweden and modern initial treatment was defined as including certain drug combinations. To adjust for time to treatment bias, survival analyses were performed also for patients alive 6 months after diagnosis. In all treated MM patients (n = 5326), we observed a superior overall survival (OS) for region A compared to all other regions (p < .01 for all respectively). After adjusting for time to treatment there was also a superior survival in the region with highest use of modern initial treatment (region A) compared to the regions defined in the study as having intermediate and low use (p < .01 for both). In patients receiving autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) a superior survival was observed for region A compared to all regions besides region B. Similar results were seen when adjusting for a time to treatment bias. In patients not receiving ASCT, 75 years or older and adjusted for time to treatment bias, a difference was noted only between region A and E (log rank p = .04, HR 1.2, CI 1.00–1.44, p = .06). In multivariate analyses including age, international staging system stage and time period of diagnosis, differences in survival remained for patients receiving ASCT between region A versus C, D, E and F (p = .01, p < .01, p < .01, p = .03). CONCLUSION: We observed a superior survival in region A for patients receiving ASCT. Explanations may be higher usage of modern initial treatment or regional residual confounding. For patients not receiving ASCT, 75 years or older, differences in survival could be adjusted for.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9675390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96753902022-11-21 Regional differences in treatment and outcome for myeloma patients in Sweden: A population based Swedish myeloma register study Wålinder, Göran Genell, Anna Juliusson, Gunnar Svensson, Ronald Santamaria, Antonio Izarra Crafoord, Jacob Carlson, Kristina Knut‐Bojanowska, Dorota Veskovski, Ljupco Lauri, Birgitta Lund, Johan Turesson, Ingemar Hansson, Markus Blimark, Cecilie Hveding Nahi, Hareth Cancer Rep (Hoboken) Original Articles BACKGROUND: We wanted to evaluate if health care for multiple myeloma (MM) patients is equal in different regions of Sweden. AIM: To study differences in survival for MM depending on health care region and early use of modern treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from the Swedish Myeloma Register from patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2017 was used. Cohorts were defined by the six healthcare regions (labeled A–F) in Sweden and modern initial treatment was defined as including certain drug combinations. To adjust for time to treatment bias, survival analyses were performed also for patients alive 6 months after diagnosis. In all treated MM patients (n = 5326), we observed a superior overall survival (OS) for region A compared to all other regions (p < .01 for all respectively). After adjusting for time to treatment there was also a superior survival in the region with highest use of modern initial treatment (region A) compared to the regions defined in the study as having intermediate and low use (p < .01 for both). In patients receiving autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) a superior survival was observed for region A compared to all regions besides region B. Similar results were seen when adjusting for a time to treatment bias. In patients not receiving ASCT, 75 years or older and adjusted for time to treatment bias, a difference was noted only between region A and E (log rank p = .04, HR 1.2, CI 1.00–1.44, p = .06). In multivariate analyses including age, international staging system stage and time period of diagnosis, differences in survival remained for patients receiving ASCT between region A versus C, D, E and F (p = .01, p < .01, p < .01, p = .03). CONCLUSION: We observed a superior survival in region A for patients receiving ASCT. Explanations may be higher usage of modern initial treatment or regional residual confounding. For patients not receiving ASCT, 75 years or older, differences in survival could be adjusted for. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9675390/ /pubmed/35243814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1614 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Wålinder, Göran
Genell, Anna
Juliusson, Gunnar
Svensson, Ronald
Santamaria, Antonio Izarra
Crafoord, Jacob
Carlson, Kristina
Knut‐Bojanowska, Dorota
Veskovski, Ljupco
Lauri, Birgitta
Lund, Johan
Turesson, Ingemar
Hansson, Markus
Blimark, Cecilie Hveding
Nahi, Hareth
Regional differences in treatment and outcome for myeloma patients in Sweden: A population based Swedish myeloma register study
title Regional differences in treatment and outcome for myeloma patients in Sweden: A population based Swedish myeloma register study
title_full Regional differences in treatment and outcome for myeloma patients in Sweden: A population based Swedish myeloma register study
title_fullStr Regional differences in treatment and outcome for myeloma patients in Sweden: A population based Swedish myeloma register study
title_full_unstemmed Regional differences in treatment and outcome for myeloma patients in Sweden: A population based Swedish myeloma register study
title_short Regional differences in treatment and outcome for myeloma patients in Sweden: A population based Swedish myeloma register study
title_sort regional differences in treatment and outcome for myeloma patients in sweden: a population based swedish myeloma register study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9675390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35243814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1614
work_keys_str_mv AT walindergoran regionaldifferencesintreatmentandoutcomeformyelomapatientsinswedenapopulationbasedswedishmyelomaregisterstudy
AT genellanna regionaldifferencesintreatmentandoutcomeformyelomapatientsinswedenapopulationbasedswedishmyelomaregisterstudy
AT juliussongunnar regionaldifferencesintreatmentandoutcomeformyelomapatientsinswedenapopulationbasedswedishmyelomaregisterstudy
AT svenssonronald regionaldifferencesintreatmentandoutcomeformyelomapatientsinswedenapopulationbasedswedishmyelomaregisterstudy
AT santamariaantonioizarra regionaldifferencesintreatmentandoutcomeformyelomapatientsinswedenapopulationbasedswedishmyelomaregisterstudy
AT crafoordjacob regionaldifferencesintreatmentandoutcomeformyelomapatientsinswedenapopulationbasedswedishmyelomaregisterstudy
AT carlsonkristina regionaldifferencesintreatmentandoutcomeformyelomapatientsinswedenapopulationbasedswedishmyelomaregisterstudy
AT knutbojanowskadorota regionaldifferencesintreatmentandoutcomeformyelomapatientsinswedenapopulationbasedswedishmyelomaregisterstudy
AT veskovskiljupco regionaldifferencesintreatmentandoutcomeformyelomapatientsinswedenapopulationbasedswedishmyelomaregisterstudy
AT lauribirgitta regionaldifferencesintreatmentandoutcomeformyelomapatientsinswedenapopulationbasedswedishmyelomaregisterstudy
AT lundjohan regionaldifferencesintreatmentandoutcomeformyelomapatientsinswedenapopulationbasedswedishmyelomaregisterstudy
AT turessoningemar regionaldifferencesintreatmentandoutcomeformyelomapatientsinswedenapopulationbasedswedishmyelomaregisterstudy
AT hanssonmarkus regionaldifferencesintreatmentandoutcomeformyelomapatientsinswedenapopulationbasedswedishmyelomaregisterstudy
AT blimarkceciliehveding regionaldifferencesintreatmentandoutcomeformyelomapatientsinswedenapopulationbasedswedishmyelomaregisterstudy
AT nahihareth regionaldifferencesintreatmentandoutcomeformyelomapatientsinswedenapopulationbasedswedishmyelomaregisterstudy