Cargando…
Regional differences in treatment and outcome for myeloma patients in Sweden: A population based Swedish myeloma register study
BACKGROUND: We wanted to evaluate if health care for multiple myeloma (MM) patients is equal in different regions of Sweden. AIM: To study differences in survival for MM depending on health care region and early use of modern treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from the Swedish Myeloma Register fro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9675390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35243814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1614 |
_version_ | 1784833364344176640 |
---|---|
author | Wålinder, Göran Genell, Anna Juliusson, Gunnar Svensson, Ronald Santamaria, Antonio Izarra Crafoord, Jacob Carlson, Kristina Knut‐Bojanowska, Dorota Veskovski, Ljupco Lauri, Birgitta Lund, Johan Turesson, Ingemar Hansson, Markus Blimark, Cecilie Hveding Nahi, Hareth |
author_facet | Wålinder, Göran Genell, Anna Juliusson, Gunnar Svensson, Ronald Santamaria, Antonio Izarra Crafoord, Jacob Carlson, Kristina Knut‐Bojanowska, Dorota Veskovski, Ljupco Lauri, Birgitta Lund, Johan Turesson, Ingemar Hansson, Markus Blimark, Cecilie Hveding Nahi, Hareth |
author_sort | Wålinder, Göran |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We wanted to evaluate if health care for multiple myeloma (MM) patients is equal in different regions of Sweden. AIM: To study differences in survival for MM depending on health care region and early use of modern treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from the Swedish Myeloma Register from patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2017 was used. Cohorts were defined by the six healthcare regions (labeled A–F) in Sweden and modern initial treatment was defined as including certain drug combinations. To adjust for time to treatment bias, survival analyses were performed also for patients alive 6 months after diagnosis. In all treated MM patients (n = 5326), we observed a superior overall survival (OS) for region A compared to all other regions (p < .01 for all respectively). After adjusting for time to treatment there was also a superior survival in the region with highest use of modern initial treatment (region A) compared to the regions defined in the study as having intermediate and low use (p < .01 for both). In patients receiving autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) a superior survival was observed for region A compared to all regions besides region B. Similar results were seen when adjusting for a time to treatment bias. In patients not receiving ASCT, 75 years or older and adjusted for time to treatment bias, a difference was noted only between region A and E (log rank p = .04, HR 1.2, CI 1.00–1.44, p = .06). In multivariate analyses including age, international staging system stage and time period of diagnosis, differences in survival remained for patients receiving ASCT between region A versus C, D, E and F (p = .01, p < .01, p < .01, p = .03). CONCLUSION: We observed a superior survival in region A for patients receiving ASCT. Explanations may be higher usage of modern initial treatment or regional residual confounding. For patients not receiving ASCT, 75 years or older, differences in survival could be adjusted for. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9675390 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96753902022-11-21 Regional differences in treatment and outcome for myeloma patients in Sweden: A population based Swedish myeloma register study Wålinder, Göran Genell, Anna Juliusson, Gunnar Svensson, Ronald Santamaria, Antonio Izarra Crafoord, Jacob Carlson, Kristina Knut‐Bojanowska, Dorota Veskovski, Ljupco Lauri, Birgitta Lund, Johan Turesson, Ingemar Hansson, Markus Blimark, Cecilie Hveding Nahi, Hareth Cancer Rep (Hoboken) Original Articles BACKGROUND: We wanted to evaluate if health care for multiple myeloma (MM) patients is equal in different regions of Sweden. AIM: To study differences in survival for MM depending on health care region and early use of modern treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from the Swedish Myeloma Register from patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2017 was used. Cohorts were defined by the six healthcare regions (labeled A–F) in Sweden and modern initial treatment was defined as including certain drug combinations. To adjust for time to treatment bias, survival analyses were performed also for patients alive 6 months after diagnosis. In all treated MM patients (n = 5326), we observed a superior overall survival (OS) for region A compared to all other regions (p < .01 for all respectively). After adjusting for time to treatment there was also a superior survival in the region with highest use of modern initial treatment (region A) compared to the regions defined in the study as having intermediate and low use (p < .01 for both). In patients receiving autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) a superior survival was observed for region A compared to all regions besides region B. Similar results were seen when adjusting for a time to treatment bias. In patients not receiving ASCT, 75 years or older and adjusted for time to treatment bias, a difference was noted only between region A and E (log rank p = .04, HR 1.2, CI 1.00–1.44, p = .06). In multivariate analyses including age, international staging system stage and time period of diagnosis, differences in survival remained for patients receiving ASCT between region A versus C, D, E and F (p = .01, p < .01, p < .01, p = .03). CONCLUSION: We observed a superior survival in region A for patients receiving ASCT. Explanations may be higher usage of modern initial treatment or regional residual confounding. For patients not receiving ASCT, 75 years or older, differences in survival could be adjusted for. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9675390/ /pubmed/35243814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1614 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Wålinder, Göran Genell, Anna Juliusson, Gunnar Svensson, Ronald Santamaria, Antonio Izarra Crafoord, Jacob Carlson, Kristina Knut‐Bojanowska, Dorota Veskovski, Ljupco Lauri, Birgitta Lund, Johan Turesson, Ingemar Hansson, Markus Blimark, Cecilie Hveding Nahi, Hareth Regional differences in treatment and outcome for myeloma patients in Sweden: A population based Swedish myeloma register study |
title | Regional differences in treatment and outcome for myeloma patients in Sweden: A population based Swedish myeloma register study |
title_full | Regional differences in treatment and outcome for myeloma patients in Sweden: A population based Swedish myeloma register study |
title_fullStr | Regional differences in treatment and outcome for myeloma patients in Sweden: A population based Swedish myeloma register study |
title_full_unstemmed | Regional differences in treatment and outcome for myeloma patients in Sweden: A population based Swedish myeloma register study |
title_short | Regional differences in treatment and outcome for myeloma patients in Sweden: A population based Swedish myeloma register study |
title_sort | regional differences in treatment and outcome for myeloma patients in sweden: a population based swedish myeloma register study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9675390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35243814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1614 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walindergoran regionaldifferencesintreatmentandoutcomeformyelomapatientsinswedenapopulationbasedswedishmyelomaregisterstudy AT genellanna regionaldifferencesintreatmentandoutcomeformyelomapatientsinswedenapopulationbasedswedishmyelomaregisterstudy AT juliussongunnar regionaldifferencesintreatmentandoutcomeformyelomapatientsinswedenapopulationbasedswedishmyelomaregisterstudy AT svenssonronald regionaldifferencesintreatmentandoutcomeformyelomapatientsinswedenapopulationbasedswedishmyelomaregisterstudy AT santamariaantonioizarra regionaldifferencesintreatmentandoutcomeformyelomapatientsinswedenapopulationbasedswedishmyelomaregisterstudy AT crafoordjacob regionaldifferencesintreatmentandoutcomeformyelomapatientsinswedenapopulationbasedswedishmyelomaregisterstudy AT carlsonkristina regionaldifferencesintreatmentandoutcomeformyelomapatientsinswedenapopulationbasedswedishmyelomaregisterstudy AT knutbojanowskadorota regionaldifferencesintreatmentandoutcomeformyelomapatientsinswedenapopulationbasedswedishmyelomaregisterstudy AT veskovskiljupco regionaldifferencesintreatmentandoutcomeformyelomapatientsinswedenapopulationbasedswedishmyelomaregisterstudy AT lauribirgitta regionaldifferencesintreatmentandoutcomeformyelomapatientsinswedenapopulationbasedswedishmyelomaregisterstudy AT lundjohan regionaldifferencesintreatmentandoutcomeformyelomapatientsinswedenapopulationbasedswedishmyelomaregisterstudy AT turessoningemar regionaldifferencesintreatmentandoutcomeformyelomapatientsinswedenapopulationbasedswedishmyelomaregisterstudy AT hanssonmarkus regionaldifferencesintreatmentandoutcomeformyelomapatientsinswedenapopulationbasedswedishmyelomaregisterstudy AT blimarkceciliehveding regionaldifferencesintreatmentandoutcomeformyelomapatientsinswedenapopulationbasedswedishmyelomaregisterstudy AT nahihareth regionaldifferencesintreatmentandoutcomeformyelomapatientsinswedenapopulationbasedswedishmyelomaregisterstudy |