Cargando…

Comparison of two protocols of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser treatment for non-resolving central serous chorioretinopathy

PURPOSE: To study the effect of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser treatment on central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) and to compare two laser protocols. As per our knowledge, there are no studies comparing the two protocols of subthreshold laser. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with non-resolving...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beniwal, Abhijeet, Shaikh, Nawazish, Chawla, Rohan, Azad, Shorya Vardhan, Kumar, Vinod, Vohra, Rajpal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9675531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36018117
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_228_22
_version_ 1784833395659898880
author Beniwal, Abhijeet
Shaikh, Nawazish
Chawla, Rohan
Azad, Shorya Vardhan
Kumar, Vinod
Vohra, Rajpal
author_facet Beniwal, Abhijeet
Shaikh, Nawazish
Chawla, Rohan
Azad, Shorya Vardhan
Kumar, Vinod
Vohra, Rajpal
author_sort Beniwal, Abhijeet
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To study the effect of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser treatment on central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) and to compare two laser protocols. As per our knowledge, there are no studies comparing the two protocols of subthreshold laser. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with non-resolving CSC of at least three months duration were treated with subthreshold laser (577 nm). Ten patients were treated with 5% duty cycle (group A) and 13 patients with 10% duty cycle (group B). At one month, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), subretinal fluid (SRF), choroidal thickness (CT) and choroidal vascularity index (CVI) were evaluated. RESULTS: In group A, BCVA improved from 0.508 ± 504 to 0.174 ± 0.171 (P = 0.0058), CMT improved from 349.8 ± 168.9 micrometers (µm) to 183.3 ± 70.312 µm (P = 0.0093) and SRF reduced from 202.4 ± 158.024 to 43.8 ± 46.599 µm (P = 0.0069). In group B, BCVA improved from 0.437 ± 0.426 to 0.289 ± 0.470 (P = 0.0026), CMT improved from 280.846 ± 72.668 to 196.769 ± 72.62 µm (P = 0.0002) and SRF reduced from 110.385 ± 57.687 µm to 52.538 ± 52.111 µm (P = 0.0064). No significant difference was found in BCVA and CMT between the groups (P = 0.8716 and P = 0.8523, respectively). CSC completely resolved in 50% of cases in group A and in 69.2% of cases in group B. This difference was not statistically significant (0.423); however, the odds ratio of resolution was 2.25 times more with 10% duty cycle. No change was observed on fundus autofluorescence (FAF) following laser. CONCLUSION: Subthreshold micropulse laser can lead to resolution of SRF in 60.87% of cases (groups A and B combined). Ten per cent duty cycle had higher odds of resolution without causing any RPE damage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9675531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96755312022-11-20 Comparison of two protocols of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser treatment for non-resolving central serous chorioretinopathy Beniwal, Abhijeet Shaikh, Nawazish Chawla, Rohan Azad, Shorya Vardhan Kumar, Vinod Vohra, Rajpal Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To study the effect of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser treatment on central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) and to compare two laser protocols. As per our knowledge, there are no studies comparing the two protocols of subthreshold laser. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with non-resolving CSC of at least three months duration were treated with subthreshold laser (577 nm). Ten patients were treated with 5% duty cycle (group A) and 13 patients with 10% duty cycle (group B). At one month, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), subretinal fluid (SRF), choroidal thickness (CT) and choroidal vascularity index (CVI) were evaluated. RESULTS: In group A, BCVA improved from 0.508 ± 504 to 0.174 ± 0.171 (P = 0.0058), CMT improved from 349.8 ± 168.9 micrometers (µm) to 183.3 ± 70.312 µm (P = 0.0093) and SRF reduced from 202.4 ± 158.024 to 43.8 ± 46.599 µm (P = 0.0069). In group B, BCVA improved from 0.437 ± 0.426 to 0.289 ± 0.470 (P = 0.0026), CMT improved from 280.846 ± 72.668 to 196.769 ± 72.62 µm (P = 0.0002) and SRF reduced from 110.385 ± 57.687 µm to 52.538 ± 52.111 µm (P = 0.0064). No significant difference was found in BCVA and CMT between the groups (P = 0.8716 and P = 0.8523, respectively). CSC completely resolved in 50% of cases in group A and in 69.2% of cases in group B. This difference was not statistically significant (0.423); however, the odds ratio of resolution was 2.25 times more with 10% duty cycle. No change was observed on fundus autofluorescence (FAF) following laser. CONCLUSION: Subthreshold micropulse laser can lead to resolution of SRF in 60.87% of cases (groups A and B combined). Ten per cent duty cycle had higher odds of resolution without causing any RPE damage. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-09 2022-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9675531/ /pubmed/36018117 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_228_22 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Beniwal, Abhijeet
Shaikh, Nawazish
Chawla, Rohan
Azad, Shorya Vardhan
Kumar, Vinod
Vohra, Rajpal
Comparison of two protocols of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser treatment for non-resolving central serous chorioretinopathy
title Comparison of two protocols of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser treatment for non-resolving central serous chorioretinopathy
title_full Comparison of two protocols of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser treatment for non-resolving central serous chorioretinopathy
title_fullStr Comparison of two protocols of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser treatment for non-resolving central serous chorioretinopathy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two protocols of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser treatment for non-resolving central serous chorioretinopathy
title_short Comparison of two protocols of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser treatment for non-resolving central serous chorioretinopathy
title_sort comparison of two protocols of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser treatment for non-resolving central serous chorioretinopathy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9675531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36018117
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_228_22
work_keys_str_mv AT beniwalabhijeet comparisonoftwoprotocolsofsubthresholdmicropulseyellowlasertreatmentfornonresolvingcentralserouschorioretinopathy
AT shaikhnawazish comparisonoftwoprotocolsofsubthresholdmicropulseyellowlasertreatmentfornonresolvingcentralserouschorioretinopathy
AT chawlarohan comparisonoftwoprotocolsofsubthresholdmicropulseyellowlasertreatmentfornonresolvingcentralserouschorioretinopathy
AT azadshoryavardhan comparisonoftwoprotocolsofsubthresholdmicropulseyellowlasertreatmentfornonresolvingcentralserouschorioretinopathy
AT kumarvinod comparisonoftwoprotocolsofsubthresholdmicropulseyellowlasertreatmentfornonresolvingcentralserouschorioretinopathy
AT vohrarajpal comparisonoftwoprotocolsofsubthresholdmicropulseyellowlasertreatmentfornonresolvingcentralserouschorioretinopathy