Cargando…

Predator-induced transgenerational plasticity in animals: a meta-analysis

There is growing evidence that the environment experienced by one generation can influence phenotypes in the next generation via transgenerational plasticity (TGP). One of the best-studied examples of TGP in animals is predator-induced transgenerational plasticity, whereby exposing parents to predat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MacLeod, Kirsty J., Monestier, Chloé, Ferrari, Maud C. O., McGhee, Katie E., Sheriff, Michael J., Bell, Alison M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9675678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36319867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-022-05274-w
_version_ 1784833426288803840
author MacLeod, Kirsty J.
Monestier, Chloé
Ferrari, Maud C. O.
McGhee, Katie E.
Sheriff, Michael J.
Bell, Alison M.
author_facet MacLeod, Kirsty J.
Monestier, Chloé
Ferrari, Maud C. O.
McGhee, Katie E.
Sheriff, Michael J.
Bell, Alison M.
author_sort MacLeod, Kirsty J.
collection PubMed
description There is growing evidence that the environment experienced by one generation can influence phenotypes in the next generation via transgenerational plasticity (TGP). One of the best-studied examples of TGP in animals is predator-induced transgenerational plasticity, whereby exposing parents to predation risk triggers changes in offspring phenotypes. Yet, there is a lack of general consensus synthesizing the predator–prey literature with existing theory pertaining to ecology and evolution of TGP. Here, we apply a meta-analysis to the sizable literature on predator-induced TGP (441 effect sizes from 29 species and 49 studies) to explore five hypotheses about the magnitude, form and direction of predator-induced TGP. Hypothesis #1: the strength of predator-induced TGP should vary with the number of predator cues. Hypothesis #2: the strength of predator-induced TGP should vary with reproductive mode. Hypothesis #3: the strength and direction of predator-induced TGP should vary among offspring phenotypic traits because some traits are more plastic than others. Hypothesis #4: the strength of predator-induced TGP should wane over ontogeny. Hypothesis #5: predator-induced TGP should generate adaptive phenotypes that should be more evident when offspring are themselves exposed to risk. We found strong evidence for predator-induced TGP overall, but no evidence that parental predator exposure causes offspring traits to change in a particular direction. Additionally, we found little evidence in support of any of the specific hypotheses. We infer that the failure to find consistent evidence reflects the heterogeneous nature of the phenomena, and the highly diverse experimental designs used to study it. Together, these findings set an agenda for future work in this area. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00442-022-05274-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9675678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96756782022-11-21 Predator-induced transgenerational plasticity in animals: a meta-analysis MacLeod, Kirsty J. Monestier, Chloé Ferrari, Maud C. O. McGhee, Katie E. Sheriff, Michael J. Bell, Alison M. Oecologia Behavioral Ecology–Original Research There is growing evidence that the environment experienced by one generation can influence phenotypes in the next generation via transgenerational plasticity (TGP). One of the best-studied examples of TGP in animals is predator-induced transgenerational plasticity, whereby exposing parents to predation risk triggers changes in offspring phenotypes. Yet, there is a lack of general consensus synthesizing the predator–prey literature with existing theory pertaining to ecology and evolution of TGP. Here, we apply a meta-analysis to the sizable literature on predator-induced TGP (441 effect sizes from 29 species and 49 studies) to explore five hypotheses about the magnitude, form and direction of predator-induced TGP. Hypothesis #1: the strength of predator-induced TGP should vary with the number of predator cues. Hypothesis #2: the strength of predator-induced TGP should vary with reproductive mode. Hypothesis #3: the strength and direction of predator-induced TGP should vary among offspring phenotypic traits because some traits are more plastic than others. Hypothesis #4: the strength of predator-induced TGP should wane over ontogeny. Hypothesis #5: predator-induced TGP should generate adaptive phenotypes that should be more evident when offspring are themselves exposed to risk. We found strong evidence for predator-induced TGP overall, but no evidence that parental predator exposure causes offspring traits to change in a particular direction. Additionally, we found little evidence in support of any of the specific hypotheses. We infer that the failure to find consistent evidence reflects the heterogeneous nature of the phenomena, and the highly diverse experimental designs used to study it. Together, these findings set an agenda for future work in this area. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00442-022-05274-w. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-11-01 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9675678/ /pubmed/36319867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-022-05274-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Behavioral Ecology–Original Research
MacLeod, Kirsty J.
Monestier, Chloé
Ferrari, Maud C. O.
McGhee, Katie E.
Sheriff, Michael J.
Bell, Alison M.
Predator-induced transgenerational plasticity in animals: a meta-analysis
title Predator-induced transgenerational plasticity in animals: a meta-analysis
title_full Predator-induced transgenerational plasticity in animals: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Predator-induced transgenerational plasticity in animals: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Predator-induced transgenerational plasticity in animals: a meta-analysis
title_short Predator-induced transgenerational plasticity in animals: a meta-analysis
title_sort predator-induced transgenerational plasticity in animals: a meta-analysis
topic Behavioral Ecology–Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9675678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36319867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-022-05274-w
work_keys_str_mv AT macleodkirstyj predatorinducedtransgenerationalplasticityinanimalsametaanalysis
AT monestierchloe predatorinducedtransgenerationalplasticityinanimalsametaanalysis
AT ferrarimaudco predatorinducedtransgenerationalplasticityinanimalsametaanalysis
AT mcgheekatiee predatorinducedtransgenerationalplasticityinanimalsametaanalysis
AT sheriffmichaelj predatorinducedtransgenerationalplasticityinanimalsametaanalysis
AT bellalisonm predatorinducedtransgenerationalplasticityinanimalsametaanalysis