Cargando…

Identifying common core outcome domains from core outcome sets of musculoskeletal conditions: protocol for a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Core outcome sets (COSs) aim to reduce outcome heterogeneity in clinical practice and research by suggesting a minimum number of agreed-upon outcomes in clinical trials. Most COSs in the musculoskeletal field are developed for specific conditions. We propose that there are likely to be c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sabet, Tamer S., Anderson, David B., Stubbs, Peter W., Buchbinder, Rachelle, Terwee, Caroline B., Chiarotto, Alessandro, Gagnier, Joel, Verhagen, Arianne P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9675955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36403060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02120-1
_version_ 1784833483907006464
author Sabet, Tamer S.
Anderson, David B.
Stubbs, Peter W.
Buchbinder, Rachelle
Terwee, Caroline B.
Chiarotto, Alessandro
Gagnier, Joel
Verhagen, Arianne P.
author_facet Sabet, Tamer S.
Anderson, David B.
Stubbs, Peter W.
Buchbinder, Rachelle
Terwee, Caroline B.
Chiarotto, Alessandro
Gagnier, Joel
Verhagen, Arianne P.
author_sort Sabet, Tamer S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Core outcome sets (COSs) aim to reduce outcome heterogeneity in clinical practice and research by suggesting a minimum number of agreed-upon outcomes in clinical trials. Most COSs in the musculoskeletal field are developed for specific conditions. We propose that there are likely to be common core domains within existing musculoskeletal COSs that may be used as a starting point in the development of future COSs. We aim to identify common core domains from existing COSs and to facilitate the development of new COSs for musculoskeletal conditions. As a secondary aim, we will assess the development quality of these COSs. METHODS: A systematic review including musculoskeletal COSs. We will search Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) database, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Methodology Register and International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurement (ICHOM). Studies will be included if related to the development of a COS in adults with musculoskeletal conditions and for any type of intervention. Quality will be assessed using the Core Outcome Set-Standards for Development (COS-STAD) recommendations. Data extracted will include scope of the COS, health condition, interventions and outcome domains. Primary outcomes will be all core domains recommended within each COS. We define a common core outcome domain as one present in at least 67% of all COSs. All findings will be summarized and presented using descriptive statistics. DISCUSSION: This systematic review of COSs will describe the core domains recommended within each musculoskeletal COS. Common domains found may be used in the initial stages of development of future musculoskeletal COSs. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021239141 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-022-02120-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9675955
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96759552022-11-21 Identifying common core outcome domains from core outcome sets of musculoskeletal conditions: protocol for a systematic review Sabet, Tamer S. Anderson, David B. Stubbs, Peter W. Buchbinder, Rachelle Terwee, Caroline B. Chiarotto, Alessandro Gagnier, Joel Verhagen, Arianne P. Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Core outcome sets (COSs) aim to reduce outcome heterogeneity in clinical practice and research by suggesting a minimum number of agreed-upon outcomes in clinical trials. Most COSs in the musculoskeletal field are developed for specific conditions. We propose that there are likely to be common core domains within existing musculoskeletal COSs that may be used as a starting point in the development of future COSs. We aim to identify common core domains from existing COSs and to facilitate the development of new COSs for musculoskeletal conditions. As a secondary aim, we will assess the development quality of these COSs. METHODS: A systematic review including musculoskeletal COSs. We will search Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) database, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Methodology Register and International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurement (ICHOM). Studies will be included if related to the development of a COS in adults with musculoskeletal conditions and for any type of intervention. Quality will be assessed using the Core Outcome Set-Standards for Development (COS-STAD) recommendations. Data extracted will include scope of the COS, health condition, interventions and outcome domains. Primary outcomes will be all core domains recommended within each COS. We define a common core outcome domain as one present in at least 67% of all COSs. All findings will be summarized and presented using descriptive statistics. DISCUSSION: This systematic review of COSs will describe the core domains recommended within each musculoskeletal COS. Common domains found may be used in the initial stages of development of future musculoskeletal COSs. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021239141 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-022-02120-1. BioMed Central 2022-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9675955/ /pubmed/36403060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02120-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Protocol
Sabet, Tamer S.
Anderson, David B.
Stubbs, Peter W.
Buchbinder, Rachelle
Terwee, Caroline B.
Chiarotto, Alessandro
Gagnier, Joel
Verhagen, Arianne P.
Identifying common core outcome domains from core outcome sets of musculoskeletal conditions: protocol for a systematic review
title Identifying common core outcome domains from core outcome sets of musculoskeletal conditions: protocol for a systematic review
title_full Identifying common core outcome domains from core outcome sets of musculoskeletal conditions: protocol for a systematic review
title_fullStr Identifying common core outcome domains from core outcome sets of musculoskeletal conditions: protocol for a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Identifying common core outcome domains from core outcome sets of musculoskeletal conditions: protocol for a systematic review
title_short Identifying common core outcome domains from core outcome sets of musculoskeletal conditions: protocol for a systematic review
title_sort identifying common core outcome domains from core outcome sets of musculoskeletal conditions: protocol for a systematic review
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9675955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36403060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02120-1
work_keys_str_mv AT sabettamers identifyingcommoncoreoutcomedomainsfromcoreoutcomesetsofmusculoskeletalconditionsprotocolforasystematicreview
AT andersondavidb identifyingcommoncoreoutcomedomainsfromcoreoutcomesetsofmusculoskeletalconditionsprotocolforasystematicreview
AT stubbspeterw identifyingcommoncoreoutcomedomainsfromcoreoutcomesetsofmusculoskeletalconditionsprotocolforasystematicreview
AT buchbinderrachelle identifyingcommoncoreoutcomedomainsfromcoreoutcomesetsofmusculoskeletalconditionsprotocolforasystematicreview
AT terweecarolineb identifyingcommoncoreoutcomedomainsfromcoreoutcomesetsofmusculoskeletalconditionsprotocolforasystematicreview
AT chiarottoalessandro identifyingcommoncoreoutcomedomainsfromcoreoutcomesetsofmusculoskeletalconditionsprotocolforasystematicreview
AT gagnierjoel identifyingcommoncoreoutcomedomainsfromcoreoutcomesetsofmusculoskeletalconditionsprotocolforasystematicreview
AT verhagenariannep identifyingcommoncoreoutcomedomainsfromcoreoutcomesetsofmusculoskeletalconditionsprotocolforasystematicreview