Cargando…
Biomechanical studies of different numbers and positions of cage implantation on minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion: A finite element analysis
BACKGROUND: The position and number of cages in minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) are mainly determined by surgeons based on their individual experience. Therefore, it is important to investigate the optimal number and position of cages in MIS-TLIF. METHODS: The lumbar mo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9676234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36420402 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1011808 |
_version_ | 1784833547073224704 |
---|---|
author | Han, Zhenchuan Ma, Chao Li, Bo Ren, Bowen Liu, Jianheng Huang, Yifei Qiao, Lin Mao, Keya |
author_facet | Han, Zhenchuan Ma, Chao Li, Bo Ren, Bowen Liu, Jianheng Huang, Yifei Qiao, Lin Mao, Keya |
author_sort | Han, Zhenchuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The position and number of cages in minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) are mainly determined by surgeons based on their individual experience. Therefore, it is important to investigate the optimal number and position of cages in MIS-TLIF. METHODS: The lumbar model was created based on a 24-year-old volunteer's computed tomography data and then tested using three different cage implantation methods: single transverse cage implantation (model A), single oblique 45° cage implantation (model B), and double vertical cage implantation (model C). A preload of 500 N and a moment of 10 Nm were applied to the models to simulate lumbar motion, and the models' range of motion (ROM), ROM ratio, peak stress of the internal fixation system, and cage were assessed. RESULTS: The ROM ratios of models A, B, and C were significantly reduced by >71% compared with the intact model under all motions. Although there were subtle differences in the ROM ratio for models A, B, and C, the trends were similar. The peak stress of the internal fixation system appeared in model B of 136.05 MPa (right lateral bending), which was 2.07 times that of model A and 1.62 times that of model C under the same condition. Model C had the lowest cage stress, which was superior to that of the single-cage model. CONCLUSION: In MIS-TLIF, single long-cage transversal implantation is a promising standard implantation method, and double short-cage implantation is recommended for patients with severe osteoporosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9676234 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96762342022-11-22 Biomechanical studies of different numbers and positions of cage implantation on minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion: A finite element analysis Han, Zhenchuan Ma, Chao Li, Bo Ren, Bowen Liu, Jianheng Huang, Yifei Qiao, Lin Mao, Keya Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: The position and number of cages in minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) are mainly determined by surgeons based on their individual experience. Therefore, it is important to investigate the optimal number and position of cages in MIS-TLIF. METHODS: The lumbar model was created based on a 24-year-old volunteer's computed tomography data and then tested using three different cage implantation methods: single transverse cage implantation (model A), single oblique 45° cage implantation (model B), and double vertical cage implantation (model C). A preload of 500 N and a moment of 10 Nm were applied to the models to simulate lumbar motion, and the models' range of motion (ROM), ROM ratio, peak stress of the internal fixation system, and cage were assessed. RESULTS: The ROM ratios of models A, B, and C were significantly reduced by >71% compared with the intact model under all motions. Although there were subtle differences in the ROM ratio for models A, B, and C, the trends were similar. The peak stress of the internal fixation system appeared in model B of 136.05 MPa (right lateral bending), which was 2.07 times that of model A and 1.62 times that of model C under the same condition. Model C had the lowest cage stress, which was superior to that of the single-cage model. CONCLUSION: In MIS-TLIF, single long-cage transversal implantation is a promising standard implantation method, and double short-cage implantation is recommended for patients with severe osteoporosis. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9676234/ /pubmed/36420402 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1011808 Text en © 2022 Han, Ma, Li, Ren, Liu, Huang, Qiao and Mao. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Han, Zhenchuan Ma, Chao Li, Bo Ren, Bowen Liu, Jianheng Huang, Yifei Qiao, Lin Mao, Keya Biomechanical studies of different numbers and positions of cage implantation on minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion: A finite element analysis |
title | Biomechanical studies of different numbers and positions of cage implantation on minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion: A finite element analysis |
title_full | Biomechanical studies of different numbers and positions of cage implantation on minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion: A finite element analysis |
title_fullStr | Biomechanical studies of different numbers and positions of cage implantation on minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion: A finite element analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomechanical studies of different numbers and positions of cage implantation on minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion: A finite element analysis |
title_short | Biomechanical studies of different numbers and positions of cage implantation on minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion: A finite element analysis |
title_sort | biomechanical studies of different numbers and positions of cage implantation on minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion: a finite element analysis |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9676234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36420402 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1011808 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hanzhenchuan biomechanicalstudiesofdifferentnumbersandpositionsofcageimplantationonminimallyinvasivetransforaminalinterbodyfusionafiniteelementanalysis AT machao biomechanicalstudiesofdifferentnumbersandpositionsofcageimplantationonminimallyinvasivetransforaminalinterbodyfusionafiniteelementanalysis AT libo biomechanicalstudiesofdifferentnumbersandpositionsofcageimplantationonminimallyinvasivetransforaminalinterbodyfusionafiniteelementanalysis AT renbowen biomechanicalstudiesofdifferentnumbersandpositionsofcageimplantationonminimallyinvasivetransforaminalinterbodyfusionafiniteelementanalysis AT liujianheng biomechanicalstudiesofdifferentnumbersandpositionsofcageimplantationonminimallyinvasivetransforaminalinterbodyfusionafiniteelementanalysis AT huangyifei biomechanicalstudiesofdifferentnumbersandpositionsofcageimplantationonminimallyinvasivetransforaminalinterbodyfusionafiniteelementanalysis AT qiaolin biomechanicalstudiesofdifferentnumbersandpositionsofcageimplantationonminimallyinvasivetransforaminalinterbodyfusionafiniteelementanalysis AT maokeya biomechanicalstudiesofdifferentnumbersandpositionsofcageimplantationonminimallyinvasivetransforaminalinterbodyfusionafiniteelementanalysis |