Cargando…

Biomechanical studies of different numbers and positions of cage implantation on minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion: A finite element analysis

BACKGROUND: The position and number of cages in minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) are mainly determined by surgeons based on their individual experience. Therefore, it is important to investigate the optimal number and position of cages in MIS-TLIF. METHODS: The lumbar mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Zhenchuan, Ma, Chao, Li, Bo, Ren, Bowen, Liu, Jianheng, Huang, Yifei, Qiao, Lin, Mao, Keya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9676234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36420402
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1011808
_version_ 1784833547073224704
author Han, Zhenchuan
Ma, Chao
Li, Bo
Ren, Bowen
Liu, Jianheng
Huang, Yifei
Qiao, Lin
Mao, Keya
author_facet Han, Zhenchuan
Ma, Chao
Li, Bo
Ren, Bowen
Liu, Jianheng
Huang, Yifei
Qiao, Lin
Mao, Keya
author_sort Han, Zhenchuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The position and number of cages in minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) are mainly determined by surgeons based on their individual experience. Therefore, it is important to investigate the optimal number and position of cages in MIS-TLIF. METHODS: The lumbar model was created based on a 24-year-old volunteer's computed tomography data and then tested using three different cage implantation methods: single transverse cage implantation (model A), single oblique 45° cage implantation (model B), and double vertical cage implantation (model C). A preload of 500 N and a moment of 10 Nm were applied to the models to simulate lumbar motion, and the models' range of motion (ROM), ROM ratio, peak stress of the internal fixation system, and cage were assessed. RESULTS: The ROM ratios of models A, B, and C were significantly reduced by >71% compared with the intact model under all motions. Although there were subtle differences in the ROM ratio for models A, B, and C, the trends were similar. The peak stress of the internal fixation system appeared in model B of 136.05 MPa (right lateral bending), which was 2.07 times that of model A and 1.62 times that of model C under the same condition. Model C had the lowest cage stress, which was superior to that of the single-cage model. CONCLUSION: In MIS-TLIF, single long-cage transversal implantation is a promising standard implantation method, and double short-cage implantation is recommended for patients with severe osteoporosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9676234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96762342022-11-22 Biomechanical studies of different numbers and positions of cage implantation on minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion: A finite element analysis Han, Zhenchuan Ma, Chao Li, Bo Ren, Bowen Liu, Jianheng Huang, Yifei Qiao, Lin Mao, Keya Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: The position and number of cages in minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) are mainly determined by surgeons based on their individual experience. Therefore, it is important to investigate the optimal number and position of cages in MIS-TLIF. METHODS: The lumbar model was created based on a 24-year-old volunteer's computed tomography data and then tested using three different cage implantation methods: single transverse cage implantation (model A), single oblique 45° cage implantation (model B), and double vertical cage implantation (model C). A preload of 500 N and a moment of 10 Nm were applied to the models to simulate lumbar motion, and the models' range of motion (ROM), ROM ratio, peak stress of the internal fixation system, and cage were assessed. RESULTS: The ROM ratios of models A, B, and C were significantly reduced by >71% compared with the intact model under all motions. Although there were subtle differences in the ROM ratio for models A, B, and C, the trends were similar. The peak stress of the internal fixation system appeared in model B of 136.05 MPa (right lateral bending), which was 2.07 times that of model A and 1.62 times that of model C under the same condition. Model C had the lowest cage stress, which was superior to that of the single-cage model. CONCLUSION: In MIS-TLIF, single long-cage transversal implantation is a promising standard implantation method, and double short-cage implantation is recommended for patients with severe osteoporosis. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9676234/ /pubmed/36420402 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1011808 Text en © 2022 Han, Ma, Li, Ren, Liu, Huang, Qiao and Mao. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Han, Zhenchuan
Ma, Chao
Li, Bo
Ren, Bowen
Liu, Jianheng
Huang, Yifei
Qiao, Lin
Mao, Keya
Biomechanical studies of different numbers and positions of cage implantation on minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion: A finite element analysis
title Biomechanical studies of different numbers and positions of cage implantation on minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion: A finite element analysis
title_full Biomechanical studies of different numbers and positions of cage implantation on minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion: A finite element analysis
title_fullStr Biomechanical studies of different numbers and positions of cage implantation on minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion: A finite element analysis
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical studies of different numbers and positions of cage implantation on minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion: A finite element analysis
title_short Biomechanical studies of different numbers and positions of cage implantation on minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion: A finite element analysis
title_sort biomechanical studies of different numbers and positions of cage implantation on minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion: a finite element analysis
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9676234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36420402
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1011808
work_keys_str_mv AT hanzhenchuan biomechanicalstudiesofdifferentnumbersandpositionsofcageimplantationonminimallyinvasivetransforaminalinterbodyfusionafiniteelementanalysis
AT machao biomechanicalstudiesofdifferentnumbersandpositionsofcageimplantationonminimallyinvasivetransforaminalinterbodyfusionafiniteelementanalysis
AT libo biomechanicalstudiesofdifferentnumbersandpositionsofcageimplantationonminimallyinvasivetransforaminalinterbodyfusionafiniteelementanalysis
AT renbowen biomechanicalstudiesofdifferentnumbersandpositionsofcageimplantationonminimallyinvasivetransforaminalinterbodyfusionafiniteelementanalysis
AT liujianheng biomechanicalstudiesofdifferentnumbersandpositionsofcageimplantationonminimallyinvasivetransforaminalinterbodyfusionafiniteelementanalysis
AT huangyifei biomechanicalstudiesofdifferentnumbersandpositionsofcageimplantationonminimallyinvasivetransforaminalinterbodyfusionafiniteelementanalysis
AT qiaolin biomechanicalstudiesofdifferentnumbersandpositionsofcageimplantationonminimallyinvasivetransforaminalinterbodyfusionafiniteelementanalysis
AT maokeya biomechanicalstudiesofdifferentnumbersandpositionsofcageimplantationonminimallyinvasivetransforaminalinterbodyfusionafiniteelementanalysis