Cargando…

Understanding the Development of a Design Thinking Mindset During a Biomedical Engineering Third-Year Course

As students gain more experience with design concepts, they should progress from novice to expert design thinkers. The purpose of this research was to identify the constructs of growth in design thinking (DT) over short- (one weekend) and long-term (10 weeks) design challenges. A DT mindset question...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davies, T. Claire, Manzin, Jesse, Meraw, Maya, Munro, Deborah S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9676826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36438449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43683-022-00093-0
_version_ 1784833680419586048
author Davies, T. Claire
Manzin, Jesse
Meraw, Maya
Munro, Deborah S.
author_facet Davies, T. Claire
Manzin, Jesse
Meraw, Maya
Munro, Deborah S.
author_sort Davies, T. Claire
collection PubMed
description As students gain more experience with design concepts, they should progress from novice to expert design thinkers. The purpose of this research was to identify the constructs of growth in design thinking (DT) over short- (one weekend) and long-term (10 weeks) design challenges. A DT mindset questionnaire was completed by students in a third-year undergraduate biomedical design course at the beginning of the course, after a one-weekend design challenge, and on completion of the course. After the short design challenge, an improvement in 15 of the 19 constructs was observed relative to baseline. Six of these constructs: mindfulness and awareness of the process, embracing risk, abductive thinking, envisioning new things, creative confidence, and optimism to make an impact, were sustained over the course of the semester indicating that a prolonged period of experiential learning can maintain short-term gains in DT. Three of the constructs: holistic views (considering the problem as a whole), diversity, and curiosity showed improvement following the short-term design challenge, then deterioration suggesting that situational circumstances are significant contributors to these constructs of DT. DT generally improves with the opportunity to collaborate, communicate, and design for a specific outcome. However, situational factors including team diversity, instructor expertise, dedicated time for team collaboration, and prior experiences can affect changes in the DT skillset.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9676826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96768262022-11-21 Understanding the Development of a Design Thinking Mindset During a Biomedical Engineering Third-Year Course Davies, T. Claire Manzin, Jesse Meraw, Maya Munro, Deborah S. Biomed Eng Educ Research Article As students gain more experience with design concepts, they should progress from novice to expert design thinkers. The purpose of this research was to identify the constructs of growth in design thinking (DT) over short- (one weekend) and long-term (10 weeks) design challenges. A DT mindset questionnaire was completed by students in a third-year undergraduate biomedical design course at the beginning of the course, after a one-weekend design challenge, and on completion of the course. After the short design challenge, an improvement in 15 of the 19 constructs was observed relative to baseline. Six of these constructs: mindfulness and awareness of the process, embracing risk, abductive thinking, envisioning new things, creative confidence, and optimism to make an impact, were sustained over the course of the semester indicating that a prolonged period of experiential learning can maintain short-term gains in DT. Three of the constructs: holistic views (considering the problem as a whole), diversity, and curiosity showed improvement following the short-term design challenge, then deterioration suggesting that situational circumstances are significant contributors to these constructs of DT. DT generally improves with the opportunity to collaborate, communicate, and design for a specific outcome. However, situational factors including team diversity, instructor expertise, dedicated time for team collaboration, and prior experiences can affect changes in the DT skillset. Springer International Publishing 2022-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9676826/ /pubmed/36438449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43683-022-00093-0 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Biomedical Engineering Society 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Research Article
Davies, T. Claire
Manzin, Jesse
Meraw, Maya
Munro, Deborah S.
Understanding the Development of a Design Thinking Mindset During a Biomedical Engineering Third-Year Course
title Understanding the Development of a Design Thinking Mindset During a Biomedical Engineering Third-Year Course
title_full Understanding the Development of a Design Thinking Mindset During a Biomedical Engineering Third-Year Course
title_fullStr Understanding the Development of a Design Thinking Mindset During a Biomedical Engineering Third-Year Course
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the Development of a Design Thinking Mindset During a Biomedical Engineering Third-Year Course
title_short Understanding the Development of a Design Thinking Mindset During a Biomedical Engineering Third-Year Course
title_sort understanding the development of a design thinking mindset during a biomedical engineering third-year course
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9676826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36438449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43683-022-00093-0
work_keys_str_mv AT daviestclaire understandingthedevelopmentofadesignthinkingmindsetduringabiomedicalengineeringthirdyearcourse
AT manzinjesse understandingthedevelopmentofadesignthinkingmindsetduringabiomedicalengineeringthirdyearcourse
AT merawmaya understandingthedevelopmentofadesignthinkingmindsetduringabiomedicalengineeringthirdyearcourse
AT munrodeborahs understandingthedevelopmentofadesignthinkingmindsetduringabiomedicalengineeringthirdyearcourse