Cargando…

Differences in the spatial fidelity of evoked and spontaneous signals in the degenerating retina

Vision restoration strategies aim to reestablish vision by replacing the function of lost photoreceptors with optoelectronic hardware or through gene therapy. One complication to these approaches is that retinal circuitry undergoes remodeling after photoreceptor loss. Circuit remodeling following pe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carleton, Maya, Oesch, Nicholas W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9676928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36419935
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2022.1040090
_version_ 1784833699366305792
author Carleton, Maya
Oesch, Nicholas W.
author_facet Carleton, Maya
Oesch, Nicholas W.
author_sort Carleton, Maya
collection PubMed
description Vision restoration strategies aim to reestablish vision by replacing the function of lost photoreceptors with optoelectronic hardware or through gene therapy. One complication to these approaches is that retinal circuitry undergoes remodeling after photoreceptor loss. Circuit remodeling following perturbation is ubiquitous in the nervous system and understanding these changes is crucial for treating neurodegeneration. Spontaneous oscillations that arise during retinal degeneration have been well-studied, however, other changes in the spatiotemporal processing of evoked and spontaneous activity have received less attention. Here we use subretinal electrical stimulation to measure the spatial and temporal spread of both spontaneous and evoked activity during retinal degeneration. We found that electrical stimulation synchronizes spontaneous oscillatory activity, over space and through time, thus leading to increased correlations in ganglion cell activity. Intriguingly, we found that spatial selectivity was maintained in rd10 retina for evoked responses, with spatial receptive fields comparable to wt retina. These findings indicate that different biophysical mechanisms are involved in mediating feed forward excitation, and the lateral spread of spontaneous activity in the rd10 retina, lending support toward the possibility of high-resolution vision restoration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9676928
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96769282022-11-22 Differences in the spatial fidelity of evoked and spontaneous signals in the degenerating retina Carleton, Maya Oesch, Nicholas W. Front Cell Neurosci Neuroscience Vision restoration strategies aim to reestablish vision by replacing the function of lost photoreceptors with optoelectronic hardware or through gene therapy. One complication to these approaches is that retinal circuitry undergoes remodeling after photoreceptor loss. Circuit remodeling following perturbation is ubiquitous in the nervous system and understanding these changes is crucial for treating neurodegeneration. Spontaneous oscillations that arise during retinal degeneration have been well-studied, however, other changes in the spatiotemporal processing of evoked and spontaneous activity have received less attention. Here we use subretinal electrical stimulation to measure the spatial and temporal spread of both spontaneous and evoked activity during retinal degeneration. We found that electrical stimulation synchronizes spontaneous oscillatory activity, over space and through time, thus leading to increased correlations in ganglion cell activity. Intriguingly, we found that spatial selectivity was maintained in rd10 retina for evoked responses, with spatial receptive fields comparable to wt retina. These findings indicate that different biophysical mechanisms are involved in mediating feed forward excitation, and the lateral spread of spontaneous activity in the rd10 retina, lending support toward the possibility of high-resolution vision restoration. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9676928/ /pubmed/36419935 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2022.1040090 Text en Copyright © 2022 Carleton and Oesch. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Carleton, Maya
Oesch, Nicholas W.
Differences in the spatial fidelity of evoked and spontaneous signals in the degenerating retina
title Differences in the spatial fidelity of evoked and spontaneous signals in the degenerating retina
title_full Differences in the spatial fidelity of evoked and spontaneous signals in the degenerating retina
title_fullStr Differences in the spatial fidelity of evoked and spontaneous signals in the degenerating retina
title_full_unstemmed Differences in the spatial fidelity of evoked and spontaneous signals in the degenerating retina
title_short Differences in the spatial fidelity of evoked and spontaneous signals in the degenerating retina
title_sort differences in the spatial fidelity of evoked and spontaneous signals in the degenerating retina
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9676928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36419935
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2022.1040090
work_keys_str_mv AT carletonmaya differencesinthespatialfidelityofevokedandspontaneoussignalsinthedegeneratingretina
AT oeschnicholasw differencesinthespatialfidelityofevokedandspontaneoussignalsinthedegeneratingretina