Cargando…
Patient-centered care and patient satisfaction: Validating the patient-professional interaction questionnaire in China
OBJECTIVE: To introduce patient-centered approach in China and to relate it with Chinese patient satisfaction via validating the Chinese version of Patient-Professional Interaction Questionnaire (PPIQ-C). DESIGN: This cross-sectional survey was conducted through face-to-face interviews from June to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9676965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36420009 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.990620 |
_version_ | 1784833708333727744 |
---|---|
author | Han, Tao Li, Sisi Li, Xueyuan Yu, Chenhao Li, Jiahui Jing, Tiantian Bai, Mayangzong Fang, Yue Qian, Kun Li, Xiaoyan Liang, Huigang Zhang, Zhiruo |
author_facet | Han, Tao Li, Sisi Li, Xueyuan Yu, Chenhao Li, Jiahui Jing, Tiantian Bai, Mayangzong Fang, Yue Qian, Kun Li, Xiaoyan Liang, Huigang Zhang, Zhiruo |
author_sort | Han, Tao |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To introduce patient-centered approach in China and to relate it with Chinese patient satisfaction via validating the Chinese version of Patient-Professional Interaction Questionnaire (PPIQ-C). DESIGN: This cross-sectional survey was conducted through face-to-face interviews from June to September in 2019. Participants rated their patient-centered care experience via the 16-item translated PPIQ, their experience of the received medical service, and their overall satisfaction. SETTING: Kunshan Huaqiao People's Hospital in Jiangsu, China. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 230 participants (87 males and 143 females; 108 outpatients and 122 inpatients). RESULTS: PPIQ-C exhibited acceptable psychometric properties. Data revealed a single factor model of the 16 PPIQ-C items [[Formula: see text] = 12.394, p = 0.823, CFI = 1.000, TLI = 1.019, RMSEA = 0.000, SRMR = 0.032] had a superior model fit over the original first-order with four correlated factors and the second-order structures. The overall reliability was excellent (McDonald's ω = 0.975). In terms of patient satisfaction, process, treatment quality, and communication significantly predicted patient satisfaction, while environment, staff attitude, and medical ethics did not [R(2) = 0.427, F((6)) = 24.887, p < 0.001]. Most importantly, the total score of PPIQ-C predicted patient satisfaction above and beyond the above-mentioned medical service perspectives (B = 0.595, SE = 0.207, p = 0.004). Finally, the constructive effect of PCC on patient satisfaction was stronger for departments of Pediatrics than Surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese version of the PPIQ scale (PPIQ-C) exhibited acceptable psychometric properties. Yet the distinction among the four factors was not supported, suggesting potential difference(s) across cultures. Patient-centered care (PCC), reflected by the overall PPIQ-C score, predicted overall patient satisfaction above and beyond other medical service perspectives. Adopting PCC approach in appropriate situations will probably advance the development of performance evaluation systems in China, thus improving the overall health care and patient satisfaction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9676965 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96769652022-11-22 Patient-centered care and patient satisfaction: Validating the patient-professional interaction questionnaire in China Han, Tao Li, Sisi Li, Xueyuan Yu, Chenhao Li, Jiahui Jing, Tiantian Bai, Mayangzong Fang, Yue Qian, Kun Li, Xiaoyan Liang, Huigang Zhang, Zhiruo Front Public Health Public Health OBJECTIVE: To introduce patient-centered approach in China and to relate it with Chinese patient satisfaction via validating the Chinese version of Patient-Professional Interaction Questionnaire (PPIQ-C). DESIGN: This cross-sectional survey was conducted through face-to-face interviews from June to September in 2019. Participants rated their patient-centered care experience via the 16-item translated PPIQ, their experience of the received medical service, and their overall satisfaction. SETTING: Kunshan Huaqiao People's Hospital in Jiangsu, China. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 230 participants (87 males and 143 females; 108 outpatients and 122 inpatients). RESULTS: PPIQ-C exhibited acceptable psychometric properties. Data revealed a single factor model of the 16 PPIQ-C items [[Formula: see text] = 12.394, p = 0.823, CFI = 1.000, TLI = 1.019, RMSEA = 0.000, SRMR = 0.032] had a superior model fit over the original first-order with four correlated factors and the second-order structures. The overall reliability was excellent (McDonald's ω = 0.975). In terms of patient satisfaction, process, treatment quality, and communication significantly predicted patient satisfaction, while environment, staff attitude, and medical ethics did not [R(2) = 0.427, F((6)) = 24.887, p < 0.001]. Most importantly, the total score of PPIQ-C predicted patient satisfaction above and beyond the above-mentioned medical service perspectives (B = 0.595, SE = 0.207, p = 0.004). Finally, the constructive effect of PCC on patient satisfaction was stronger for departments of Pediatrics than Surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese version of the PPIQ scale (PPIQ-C) exhibited acceptable psychometric properties. Yet the distinction among the four factors was not supported, suggesting potential difference(s) across cultures. Patient-centered care (PCC), reflected by the overall PPIQ-C score, predicted overall patient satisfaction above and beyond other medical service perspectives. Adopting PCC approach in appropriate situations will probably advance the development of performance evaluation systems in China, thus improving the overall health care and patient satisfaction. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9676965/ /pubmed/36420009 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.990620 Text en Copyright © 2022 Han, Li, Li, Yu, Li, Jing, Bai, Fang, Qian, Li, Liang and Zhang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Han, Tao Li, Sisi Li, Xueyuan Yu, Chenhao Li, Jiahui Jing, Tiantian Bai, Mayangzong Fang, Yue Qian, Kun Li, Xiaoyan Liang, Huigang Zhang, Zhiruo Patient-centered care and patient satisfaction: Validating the patient-professional interaction questionnaire in China |
title | Patient-centered care and patient satisfaction: Validating the patient-professional interaction questionnaire in China |
title_full | Patient-centered care and patient satisfaction: Validating the patient-professional interaction questionnaire in China |
title_fullStr | Patient-centered care and patient satisfaction: Validating the patient-professional interaction questionnaire in China |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient-centered care and patient satisfaction: Validating the patient-professional interaction questionnaire in China |
title_short | Patient-centered care and patient satisfaction: Validating the patient-professional interaction questionnaire in China |
title_sort | patient-centered care and patient satisfaction: validating the patient-professional interaction questionnaire in china |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9676965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36420009 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.990620 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hantao patientcenteredcareandpatientsatisfactionvalidatingthepatientprofessionalinteractionquestionnaireinchina AT lisisi patientcenteredcareandpatientsatisfactionvalidatingthepatientprofessionalinteractionquestionnaireinchina AT lixueyuan patientcenteredcareandpatientsatisfactionvalidatingthepatientprofessionalinteractionquestionnaireinchina AT yuchenhao patientcenteredcareandpatientsatisfactionvalidatingthepatientprofessionalinteractionquestionnaireinchina AT lijiahui patientcenteredcareandpatientsatisfactionvalidatingthepatientprofessionalinteractionquestionnaireinchina AT jingtiantian patientcenteredcareandpatientsatisfactionvalidatingthepatientprofessionalinteractionquestionnaireinchina AT baimayangzong patientcenteredcareandpatientsatisfactionvalidatingthepatientprofessionalinteractionquestionnaireinchina AT fangyue patientcenteredcareandpatientsatisfactionvalidatingthepatientprofessionalinteractionquestionnaireinchina AT qiankun patientcenteredcareandpatientsatisfactionvalidatingthepatientprofessionalinteractionquestionnaireinchina AT lixiaoyan patientcenteredcareandpatientsatisfactionvalidatingthepatientprofessionalinteractionquestionnaireinchina AT lianghuigang patientcenteredcareandpatientsatisfactionvalidatingthepatientprofessionalinteractionquestionnaireinchina AT zhangzhiruo patientcenteredcareandpatientsatisfactionvalidatingthepatientprofessionalinteractionquestionnaireinchina |