Cargando…

Identifying relative efficacy of components of prehabilitation in adult surgical patients: protocol for a systematic review and component network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Prehabilitation is a high-priority intervention for patients, the public, clinicians and health systems. However, existing knowledge syntheses are generally low quality and do not provide insights regarding the relative efficacy of different prehabilitation components (eg, exercise, nu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McIsaac, Daniel I, Hutton, Brian, Veroniki, Areti, Gill, Marlyn, Boland, Laura, Branje, Karina, Grudzinski, Alexa L, Hladkowicz, Emily, Shaw, Julia, Gillis, Chelsia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9677017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36396310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068797
_version_ 1784833720373477376
author McIsaac, Daniel I
Hutton, Brian
Veroniki, Areti
Gill, Marlyn
Boland, Laura
Branje, Karina
Grudzinski, Alexa L
Hladkowicz, Emily
Shaw, Julia
Gillis, Chelsia
author_facet McIsaac, Daniel I
Hutton, Brian
Veroniki, Areti
Gill, Marlyn
Boland, Laura
Branje, Karina
Grudzinski, Alexa L
Hladkowicz, Emily
Shaw, Julia
Gillis, Chelsia
author_sort McIsaac, Daniel I
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Prehabilitation is a high-priority intervention for patients, the public, clinicians and health systems. However, existing knowledge syntheses are generally low quality and do not provide insights regarding the relative efficacy of different prehabilitation components (eg, exercise, nutrition, psychosocial or cognitive interventions). The objective of the planned review is to evaluate the relative efficacy of different prehabilitation components to inform current care, implementation and future research. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will perform a systematic review and component network meta-analysis (CNMA). We will use a peer-reviewed search strategy to identify all randomised trials of prehabilitation in adult surgical patients from Ovid Medline, Embase, the CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, along with grey literature. All stages of the review and data extraction process will be performed in duplicate, following recommended best practices. To compare the relative efficacy of different prehabilitation components (prespecified as exercise, nutrition, psychosocial or cognitive interventions), we will use CNMA, an extension of network meta-analysis that allows estimation of the contributions to efficacy of each component of a multicomponent intervention through direct and indirect comparisons. We will use additive CNMA models for critical outcomes (postoperative complications, patient-reported recovery, physical recovery and length of stay); standard care will be the common reference condition. Pre-specified sensitivity and subgroup analyses will be conducted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review of published data does not require ethical review. Results will be disseminated via scientific conferences, peer-reviewed publications, social and traditional media and via our research network to target partners and organisations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9677017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96770172022-11-22 Identifying relative efficacy of components of prehabilitation in adult surgical patients: protocol for a systematic review and component network meta-analysis McIsaac, Daniel I Hutton, Brian Veroniki, Areti Gill, Marlyn Boland, Laura Branje, Karina Grudzinski, Alexa L Hladkowicz, Emily Shaw, Julia Gillis, Chelsia BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Prehabilitation is a high-priority intervention for patients, the public, clinicians and health systems. However, existing knowledge syntheses are generally low quality and do not provide insights regarding the relative efficacy of different prehabilitation components (eg, exercise, nutrition, psychosocial or cognitive interventions). The objective of the planned review is to evaluate the relative efficacy of different prehabilitation components to inform current care, implementation and future research. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will perform a systematic review and component network meta-analysis (CNMA). We will use a peer-reviewed search strategy to identify all randomised trials of prehabilitation in adult surgical patients from Ovid Medline, Embase, the CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, along with grey literature. All stages of the review and data extraction process will be performed in duplicate, following recommended best practices. To compare the relative efficacy of different prehabilitation components (prespecified as exercise, nutrition, psychosocial or cognitive interventions), we will use CNMA, an extension of network meta-analysis that allows estimation of the contributions to efficacy of each component of a multicomponent intervention through direct and indirect comparisons. We will use additive CNMA models for critical outcomes (postoperative complications, patient-reported recovery, physical recovery and length of stay); standard care will be the common reference condition. Pre-specified sensitivity and subgroup analyses will be conducted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review of published data does not require ethical review. Results will be disseminated via scientific conferences, peer-reviewed publications, social and traditional media and via our research network to target partners and organisations. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9677017/ /pubmed/36396310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068797 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Surgery
McIsaac, Daniel I
Hutton, Brian
Veroniki, Areti
Gill, Marlyn
Boland, Laura
Branje, Karina
Grudzinski, Alexa L
Hladkowicz, Emily
Shaw, Julia
Gillis, Chelsia
Identifying relative efficacy of components of prehabilitation in adult surgical patients: protocol for a systematic review and component network meta-analysis
title Identifying relative efficacy of components of prehabilitation in adult surgical patients: protocol for a systematic review and component network meta-analysis
title_full Identifying relative efficacy of components of prehabilitation in adult surgical patients: protocol for a systematic review and component network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Identifying relative efficacy of components of prehabilitation in adult surgical patients: protocol for a systematic review and component network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Identifying relative efficacy of components of prehabilitation in adult surgical patients: protocol for a systematic review and component network meta-analysis
title_short Identifying relative efficacy of components of prehabilitation in adult surgical patients: protocol for a systematic review and component network meta-analysis
title_sort identifying relative efficacy of components of prehabilitation in adult surgical patients: protocol for a systematic review and component network meta-analysis
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9677017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36396310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068797
work_keys_str_mv AT mcisaacdanieli identifyingrelativeefficacyofcomponentsofprehabilitationinadultsurgicalpatientsprotocolforasystematicreviewandcomponentnetworkmetaanalysis
AT huttonbrian identifyingrelativeefficacyofcomponentsofprehabilitationinadultsurgicalpatientsprotocolforasystematicreviewandcomponentnetworkmetaanalysis
AT veronikiareti identifyingrelativeefficacyofcomponentsofprehabilitationinadultsurgicalpatientsprotocolforasystematicreviewandcomponentnetworkmetaanalysis
AT gillmarlyn identifyingrelativeefficacyofcomponentsofprehabilitationinadultsurgicalpatientsprotocolforasystematicreviewandcomponentnetworkmetaanalysis
AT bolandlaura identifyingrelativeefficacyofcomponentsofprehabilitationinadultsurgicalpatientsprotocolforasystematicreviewandcomponentnetworkmetaanalysis
AT branjekarina identifyingrelativeefficacyofcomponentsofprehabilitationinadultsurgicalpatientsprotocolforasystematicreviewandcomponentnetworkmetaanalysis
AT grudzinskialexal identifyingrelativeefficacyofcomponentsofprehabilitationinadultsurgicalpatientsprotocolforasystematicreviewandcomponentnetworkmetaanalysis
AT hladkowiczemily identifyingrelativeefficacyofcomponentsofprehabilitationinadultsurgicalpatientsprotocolforasystematicreviewandcomponentnetworkmetaanalysis
AT shawjulia identifyingrelativeefficacyofcomponentsofprehabilitationinadultsurgicalpatientsprotocolforasystematicreviewandcomponentnetworkmetaanalysis
AT gillischelsia identifyingrelativeefficacyofcomponentsofprehabilitationinadultsurgicalpatientsprotocolforasystematicreviewandcomponentnetworkmetaanalysis
AT identifyingrelativeefficacyofcomponentsofprehabilitationinadultsurgicalpatientsprotocolforasystematicreviewandcomponentnetworkmetaanalysis