Cargando…

The Effect of Cochlear Dose on Hearing Preservation After Low-Dose Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE: Despite excellent tumor control after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for vestibular schwannoma (VS), the hearing preservation rate remains unsatisfactorily low. Although many factors have been associated with hearing loss, the dose to cochlea has gained more interest in recent years. Howev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Govindaraj, Ramkumar, Khong, Jeremy, Byrne, Adam, Zacest, Andrew, Roos, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9677188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36420205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101059
_version_ 1784833756949905408
author Govindaraj, Ramkumar
Khong, Jeremy
Byrne, Adam
Zacest, Andrew
Roos, Daniel
author_facet Govindaraj, Ramkumar
Khong, Jeremy
Byrne, Adam
Zacest, Andrew
Roos, Daniel
author_sort Govindaraj, Ramkumar
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Despite excellent tumor control after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for vestibular schwannoma (VS), the hearing preservation rate remains unsatisfactorily low. Although many factors have been associated with hearing loss, the dose to cochlea has gained more interest in recent years. However, studies investigating the relation between cochlear dose and hearing outcomes have produced inconsistent results. The purpose of this work is to systematically review the literature and critically analyze the studies that investigated the correlation between cochlear dose and hearing loss. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A literature search of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus was performed. Studies were included if the SRS dose used was 11 to 14 Gy and included adult patients with sporadic VS, initially serviceable hearing, and at least 24 months of mean or median follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty-one cohort studies and 1 case-control study were eligible for inclusion, and none were considered to be truly prospective. There was substantial heterogeneity between studies in terms of baseline hearing status, cochlear dosimetry, definition and reporting of hearing outcome, and duration of follow-up, limiting comparison between studies and precluding formal meta-analysis. Eleven studies showed a statistically significant correlation between cochlear dose and hearing outcome, but there was considerable variation in the reported cochlear dose parameter that predicted hearing outcome and whether it was an independent predictor. The definition of hearing outcome and whether the outcome variable is continuous or dichotomous have a bearing on the reported correlation between cochlear dose and hearing outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Whether cochlear dose is a predictor of hearing preservation after SRS for VS could not be unequivocally determined. Future studies should use consistent cochlear dosimetry and hearing outcomes for reliable assessment. In the meantime, based on currently available data, a practical approach will be to aim for a mean cochlear dose <4 to 6 Gy without compromising tumor dose.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9677188
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96771882022-11-22 The Effect of Cochlear Dose on Hearing Preservation After Low-Dose Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas: A Systematic Review Govindaraj, Ramkumar Khong, Jeremy Byrne, Adam Zacest, Andrew Roos, Daniel Adv Radiat Oncol Critical Review PURPOSE: Despite excellent tumor control after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for vestibular schwannoma (VS), the hearing preservation rate remains unsatisfactorily low. Although many factors have been associated with hearing loss, the dose to cochlea has gained more interest in recent years. However, studies investigating the relation between cochlear dose and hearing outcomes have produced inconsistent results. The purpose of this work is to systematically review the literature and critically analyze the studies that investigated the correlation between cochlear dose and hearing loss. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A literature search of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus was performed. Studies were included if the SRS dose used was 11 to 14 Gy and included adult patients with sporadic VS, initially serviceable hearing, and at least 24 months of mean or median follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty-one cohort studies and 1 case-control study were eligible for inclusion, and none were considered to be truly prospective. There was substantial heterogeneity between studies in terms of baseline hearing status, cochlear dosimetry, definition and reporting of hearing outcome, and duration of follow-up, limiting comparison between studies and precluding formal meta-analysis. Eleven studies showed a statistically significant correlation between cochlear dose and hearing outcome, but there was considerable variation in the reported cochlear dose parameter that predicted hearing outcome and whether it was an independent predictor. The definition of hearing outcome and whether the outcome variable is continuous or dichotomous have a bearing on the reported correlation between cochlear dose and hearing outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Whether cochlear dose is a predictor of hearing preservation after SRS for VS could not be unequivocally determined. Future studies should use consistent cochlear dosimetry and hearing outcomes for reliable assessment. In the meantime, based on currently available data, a practical approach will be to aim for a mean cochlear dose <4 to 6 Gy without compromising tumor dose. Elsevier 2022-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9677188/ /pubmed/36420205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101059 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Critical Review
Govindaraj, Ramkumar
Khong, Jeremy
Byrne, Adam
Zacest, Andrew
Roos, Daniel
The Effect of Cochlear Dose on Hearing Preservation After Low-Dose Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas: A Systematic Review
title The Effect of Cochlear Dose on Hearing Preservation After Low-Dose Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas: A Systematic Review
title_full The Effect of Cochlear Dose on Hearing Preservation After Low-Dose Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr The Effect of Cochlear Dose on Hearing Preservation After Low-Dose Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Cochlear Dose on Hearing Preservation After Low-Dose Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas: A Systematic Review
title_short The Effect of Cochlear Dose on Hearing Preservation After Low-Dose Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas: A Systematic Review
title_sort effect of cochlear dose on hearing preservation after low-dose stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review
topic Critical Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9677188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36420205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101059
work_keys_str_mv AT govindarajramkumar theeffectofcochleardoseonhearingpreservationafterlowdosestereotacticradiosurgeryforvestibularschwannomasasystematicreview
AT khongjeremy theeffectofcochleardoseonhearingpreservationafterlowdosestereotacticradiosurgeryforvestibularschwannomasasystematicreview
AT byrneadam theeffectofcochleardoseonhearingpreservationafterlowdosestereotacticradiosurgeryforvestibularschwannomasasystematicreview
AT zacestandrew theeffectofcochleardoseonhearingpreservationafterlowdosestereotacticradiosurgeryforvestibularschwannomasasystematicreview
AT roosdaniel theeffectofcochleardoseonhearingpreservationafterlowdosestereotacticradiosurgeryforvestibularschwannomasasystematicreview
AT govindarajramkumar effectofcochleardoseonhearingpreservationafterlowdosestereotacticradiosurgeryforvestibularschwannomasasystematicreview
AT khongjeremy effectofcochleardoseonhearingpreservationafterlowdosestereotacticradiosurgeryforvestibularschwannomasasystematicreview
AT byrneadam effectofcochleardoseonhearingpreservationafterlowdosestereotacticradiosurgeryforvestibularschwannomasasystematicreview
AT zacestandrew effectofcochleardoseonhearingpreservationafterlowdosestereotacticradiosurgeryforvestibularschwannomasasystematicreview
AT roosdaniel effectofcochleardoseonhearingpreservationafterlowdosestereotacticradiosurgeryforvestibularschwannomasasystematicreview