Cargando…

Application of the gamma‐interferon assay to determine the prevalence of bovine tuberculosis in slaughter livestock at abattoirs in Gauteng, South Africa

BACKGROUND: Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is a zoonotic disease with great economic impact estimated at billions of dollars annually worldwide. Meat inspection represents a long‐standing form of disease surveillance that serves both food safety and animal health. The objective of this study was to deter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mareledwane, Vuyokazi E., Adesiyun, Abiodun A., Thompson, Peter N., Hlokwe, Tiny M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9677385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34132064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.492
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is a zoonotic disease with great economic impact estimated at billions of dollars annually worldwide. Meat inspection represents a long‐standing form of disease surveillance that serves both food safety and animal health. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of bTB in livestock at abattoirs using a cell‐mediated immune (CMI) assay, the gamma interferon (IFN‐γ) assay. This cross‐sectional study was conducted at selected abattoirs (low‐throughput, high‐throughput and rural/informal) in Gauteng province, where animals were also subjected to routine meat inspection. RESULTS: A total of 410 fresh blood samples were collected from slaughter livestock (369 cattle and 41 sheep) from 15 abattoirs, and analysed using Bovigam(®) test kit with bovine, avian and Fortuitum purified protein derivatives (PPD) as blood stimulating antigens. The estimated prevalence of bTB in cattle was 4.4% (95% CI: 2.4%–7.3%). The prevalence of bTB in cattle varied between abattoirs (p = .005), ranging from 0% to 23%; however, there were no significant differences among genders, breeds, municipality, districts, origins of animals (feedlot, auction or farm) or throughput of abattoirs. The prevalence of avian reactors was 6.0% (95% CI: 3.6%–9.2%) in cattle, varying between abattoirs (p = .004) and ranging from 0% to 20.7%. None of the sheep with valid test results was positive for bTB and none was avian reactors (95% CI: 0%–15%). CONCLUSION: The detection of bTB reactor cattle in our study clearly shows the limitation of disease surveillance using a meat inspection approach, as all the 410 slaughter animals sampled had passed visual abattoir inspection and been classified as bTB‐free. Our findings therefore emphasize the risk of zoonotic transmission of bTB to abattoir workers and potential food safety hazard to consumers. Furthermore, our study highlights the potential for the use of the IFN‐γ assay to reduce this risk.