Cargando…

Conversion therapy with the intent to perform radical local treatment may not be suitable for patients with 10 or more liver metastases from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: The number of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLMs) is usually considered a contradictory indicator to surgical resection. However, some patients with initially unresectable CRLMs can receive radical local treatment after conversion therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the effect o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Junzhong, Sun, Hui, Zhang, Weili, Hong, Zhigang, Lu, Zhenhai, Pan, Zhizhong, Hou, Zhenlin, Peng, Jianhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9678090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35466587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4775
_version_ 1784833918492475392
author Lin, Junzhong
Sun, Hui
Zhang, Weili
Hong, Zhigang
Lu, Zhenhai
Pan, Zhizhong
Hou, Zhenlin
Peng, Jianhong
author_facet Lin, Junzhong
Sun, Hui
Zhang, Weili
Hong, Zhigang
Lu, Zhenhai
Pan, Zhizhong
Hou, Zhenlin
Peng, Jianhong
author_sort Lin, Junzhong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The number of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLMs) is usually considered a contradictory indicator to surgical resection. However, some patients with initially unresectable CRLMs can receive radical local treatment after conversion therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of radical local treatment after conversion therapy and the prognosis of patients with more than 10 initially unresectable CRLMs. METHODS: Data for a total of 229 patients with initially unresectable CRLMs were retrospectively reviewed between December 2012 and January 2020. Among these patients, 107 had ≥10 CRLMs, and 122 had <10 CRLMs. Overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) were used to reflect the prognosis of different groups of patients. Conversion therapy was defined as an initially unresectable liver metastasis converted into an R0 resectable lesion after systemic chemotherapy. Radical local treatment included hepatectomy and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). RESULTS: Patients with ≥10 CRLMs had a lower conversion rate (42.7% vs. 56.6%, p = 0.001). Baseline clinical N stage 1–2, ≥8 first‐line chemotherapy courses, and stable disease (SD) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) were independent factors predictive of conversion failure. Primary tumour location in the right colon, RECIST response of SD, and the absence of targeted therapy were independent factors predictive of unfavourable OS. The survival curves revealed that the OS of patients with or without conversion could be distinguished only among patients with <10 CRLMs (89.9% [95% CI, 82.5%–98.0%] vs. 58.9% [95% CI, 45.2%–76.7%], p < 0.001); this cut‐off point could also distinguish patients with a successful conversion outcome according to OS (89.9% [95% CI, 82.5–98.0%] vs. 58.2% [95% CI, 42.2–80.4%], p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: For CRLMs ≥ 10, patients with a successful conversion outcome cannot be distinguished from those without successful conversion outcome according to OS. Thus, conversion therapy with the intent to perform radical local treatment may not be suitable for patients with 10 or more liver metastases from colorectal cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9678090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96780902022-11-22 Conversion therapy with the intent to perform radical local treatment may not be suitable for patients with 10 or more liver metastases from colorectal cancer Lin, Junzhong Sun, Hui Zhang, Weili Hong, Zhigang Lu, Zhenhai Pan, Zhizhong Hou, Zhenlin Peng, Jianhong Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: The number of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLMs) is usually considered a contradictory indicator to surgical resection. However, some patients with initially unresectable CRLMs can receive radical local treatment after conversion therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of radical local treatment after conversion therapy and the prognosis of patients with more than 10 initially unresectable CRLMs. METHODS: Data for a total of 229 patients with initially unresectable CRLMs were retrospectively reviewed between December 2012 and January 2020. Among these patients, 107 had ≥10 CRLMs, and 122 had <10 CRLMs. Overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) were used to reflect the prognosis of different groups of patients. Conversion therapy was defined as an initially unresectable liver metastasis converted into an R0 resectable lesion after systemic chemotherapy. Radical local treatment included hepatectomy and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). RESULTS: Patients with ≥10 CRLMs had a lower conversion rate (42.7% vs. 56.6%, p = 0.001). Baseline clinical N stage 1–2, ≥8 first‐line chemotherapy courses, and stable disease (SD) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) were independent factors predictive of conversion failure. Primary tumour location in the right colon, RECIST response of SD, and the absence of targeted therapy were independent factors predictive of unfavourable OS. The survival curves revealed that the OS of patients with or without conversion could be distinguished only among patients with <10 CRLMs (89.9% [95% CI, 82.5%–98.0%] vs. 58.9% [95% CI, 45.2%–76.7%], p < 0.001); this cut‐off point could also distinguish patients with a successful conversion outcome according to OS (89.9% [95% CI, 82.5–98.0%] vs. 58.2% [95% CI, 42.2–80.4%], p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: For CRLMs ≥ 10, patients with a successful conversion outcome cannot be distinguished from those without successful conversion outcome according to OS. Thus, conversion therapy with the intent to perform radical local treatment may not be suitable for patients with 10 or more liver metastases from colorectal cancer. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9678090/ /pubmed/35466587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4775 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RESEARCH ARTICLES
Lin, Junzhong
Sun, Hui
Zhang, Weili
Hong, Zhigang
Lu, Zhenhai
Pan, Zhizhong
Hou, Zhenlin
Peng, Jianhong
Conversion therapy with the intent to perform radical local treatment may not be suitable for patients with 10 or more liver metastases from colorectal cancer
title Conversion therapy with the intent to perform radical local treatment may not be suitable for patients with 10 or more liver metastases from colorectal cancer
title_full Conversion therapy with the intent to perform radical local treatment may not be suitable for patients with 10 or more liver metastases from colorectal cancer
title_fullStr Conversion therapy with the intent to perform radical local treatment may not be suitable for patients with 10 or more liver metastases from colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Conversion therapy with the intent to perform radical local treatment may not be suitable for patients with 10 or more liver metastases from colorectal cancer
title_short Conversion therapy with the intent to perform radical local treatment may not be suitable for patients with 10 or more liver metastases from colorectal cancer
title_sort conversion therapy with the intent to perform radical local treatment may not be suitable for patients with 10 or more liver metastases from colorectal cancer
topic RESEARCH ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9678090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35466587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4775
work_keys_str_mv AT linjunzhong conversiontherapywiththeintenttoperformradicallocaltreatmentmaynotbesuitableforpatientswith10ormorelivermetastasesfromcolorectalcancer
AT sunhui conversiontherapywiththeintenttoperformradicallocaltreatmentmaynotbesuitableforpatientswith10ormorelivermetastasesfromcolorectalcancer
AT zhangweili conversiontherapywiththeintenttoperformradicallocaltreatmentmaynotbesuitableforpatientswith10ormorelivermetastasesfromcolorectalcancer
AT hongzhigang conversiontherapywiththeintenttoperformradicallocaltreatmentmaynotbesuitableforpatientswith10ormorelivermetastasesfromcolorectalcancer
AT luzhenhai conversiontherapywiththeintenttoperformradicallocaltreatmentmaynotbesuitableforpatientswith10ormorelivermetastasesfromcolorectalcancer
AT panzhizhong conversiontherapywiththeintenttoperformradicallocaltreatmentmaynotbesuitableforpatientswith10ormorelivermetastasesfromcolorectalcancer
AT houzhenlin conversiontherapywiththeintenttoperformradicallocaltreatmentmaynotbesuitableforpatientswith10ormorelivermetastasesfromcolorectalcancer
AT pengjianhong conversiontherapywiththeintenttoperformradicallocaltreatmentmaynotbesuitableforpatientswith10ormorelivermetastasesfromcolorectalcancer