Cargando…

Evaluation of angle-to-angle and spur-to-spur using swept source optical coherence tomography in different refractive error

PURPOSE: To measure angle-to-angle (ATA) and spur-to-spur (STS) distances along six meridians using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and compare with horizontal white-to-white (WTW) distance in different refractive error. METHODS: Overall, 126 eyes were assessed with the Anterion S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yun, Jeong Seop, Min, Ji Sang, Kim, Kook Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9678276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36409673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277703
_version_ 1784833956252745728
author Yun, Jeong Seop
Min, Ji Sang
Kim, Kook Young
author_facet Yun, Jeong Seop
Min, Ji Sang
Kim, Kook Young
author_sort Yun, Jeong Seop
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To measure angle-to-angle (ATA) and spur-to-spur (STS) distances along six meridians using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and compare with horizontal white-to-white (WTW) distance in different refractive error. METHODS: Overall, 126 eyes were assessed with the Anterion SS-OCT (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). ATA and STS distances were obtained using SS-OCT at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 degrees. WTW was measured at 0 degree with built-in infrared camera. One way ANOVA test, pearson correlation coefficient, and stepwise multivariate regression analysis were used to compare ATA and STS distances with age, anterior chamber depth (ACD), axial length (AL), and simulated keratometric values (Sim K) in different refractive error groups. RESULTS: The mean MRSE refraction was +0.05 ± 0.23 D in the emmetropic group (41 eyes), -3.42 ± 3.04 D in the myopic group (44 eyes), and +1.33 ± 0.64 D in the hyperopic group (31 eyes). There was no statistical difference in the WTW of the emmetropic (11.62 ± 0.44 mm), myopic (11.79 ± 0.46 mm), and hyperopic groups (11.80 ± 0.49 mm) using one-way ANOVA (p = 0.007). ATA and STS were vertically oval in all groups. The correlation between ATA, STS and age, ACD, AL, and K values showed different significance for each meridian according to the refractive error. ATA increased as the horizontal WTW, ACD, and AL increased and Sim K decreased. STS shows relatively smaller explanatory power than ATA in the stepwise multivariate regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to analyze the relationship between ATA and STS compared to WTW by different refractive error. The difference between the horizontally oval WTW and vertically oval anterior chamber can be large, especially in myopia. ATA showed a greater positive correlation than STS with AL and ACD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9678276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96782762022-11-22 Evaluation of angle-to-angle and spur-to-spur using swept source optical coherence tomography in different refractive error Yun, Jeong Seop Min, Ji Sang Kim, Kook Young PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To measure angle-to-angle (ATA) and spur-to-spur (STS) distances along six meridians using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and compare with horizontal white-to-white (WTW) distance in different refractive error. METHODS: Overall, 126 eyes were assessed with the Anterion SS-OCT (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). ATA and STS distances were obtained using SS-OCT at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 degrees. WTW was measured at 0 degree with built-in infrared camera. One way ANOVA test, pearson correlation coefficient, and stepwise multivariate regression analysis were used to compare ATA and STS distances with age, anterior chamber depth (ACD), axial length (AL), and simulated keratometric values (Sim K) in different refractive error groups. RESULTS: The mean MRSE refraction was +0.05 ± 0.23 D in the emmetropic group (41 eyes), -3.42 ± 3.04 D in the myopic group (44 eyes), and +1.33 ± 0.64 D in the hyperopic group (31 eyes). There was no statistical difference in the WTW of the emmetropic (11.62 ± 0.44 mm), myopic (11.79 ± 0.46 mm), and hyperopic groups (11.80 ± 0.49 mm) using one-way ANOVA (p = 0.007). ATA and STS were vertically oval in all groups. The correlation between ATA, STS and age, ACD, AL, and K values showed different significance for each meridian according to the refractive error. ATA increased as the horizontal WTW, ACD, and AL increased and Sim K decreased. STS shows relatively smaller explanatory power than ATA in the stepwise multivariate regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to analyze the relationship between ATA and STS compared to WTW by different refractive error. The difference between the horizontally oval WTW and vertically oval anterior chamber can be large, especially in myopia. ATA showed a greater positive correlation than STS with AL and ACD. Public Library of Science 2022-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9678276/ /pubmed/36409673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277703 Text en © 2022 Yun et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yun, Jeong Seop
Min, Ji Sang
Kim, Kook Young
Evaluation of angle-to-angle and spur-to-spur using swept source optical coherence tomography in different refractive error
title Evaluation of angle-to-angle and spur-to-spur using swept source optical coherence tomography in different refractive error
title_full Evaluation of angle-to-angle and spur-to-spur using swept source optical coherence tomography in different refractive error
title_fullStr Evaluation of angle-to-angle and spur-to-spur using swept source optical coherence tomography in different refractive error
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of angle-to-angle and spur-to-spur using swept source optical coherence tomography in different refractive error
title_short Evaluation of angle-to-angle and spur-to-spur using swept source optical coherence tomography in different refractive error
title_sort evaluation of angle-to-angle and spur-to-spur using swept source optical coherence tomography in different refractive error
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9678276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36409673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277703
work_keys_str_mv AT yunjeongseop evaluationofangletoangleandspurtospurusingsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyindifferentrefractiveerror
AT minjisang evaluationofangletoangleandspurtospurusingsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyindifferentrefractiveerror
AT kimkookyoung evaluationofangletoangleandspurtospurusingsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyindifferentrefractiveerror