Cargando…
Comparing sentencing judgments of judges and laypeople: The role of justifications
There is a lack of understanding concerning the differences between laypeople’s and professional judges’ conceptions of justifications for sentencing. We conducted an online quasi-experimental study with 50 active judges and 200 laypeople. Participants were presented with a vignette describing sever...
Autores principales: | Watamura, Eiichiro, Ioku, Tomohiro |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9678294/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36409707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277939 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Justification of Sentencing Decisions: Development of a Ratio-Based Measure Tested on Child Neglect Cases
por: Watamura, Eiichiro, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Directionality in Aesthetic Judgments and Performance Evaluation: Sport Judges and Laypeople Compared
por: Loffing, Florian, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Examining the differential effects of information about the death penalty on retributivists and non-retributivists in Japan: a refutation of Marshall's third hypothesis
por: Watamura, Eiichiro, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Slippery scales: Cost prompts, but not benefit prompts, modulate sentencing recommendations in laypeople
por: Aharoni, Eyal, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Can physicians’ judgments of futility be accepted by patients?: A comparative survey of Japanese physicians and laypeople
por: Kadooka, Yasuhiro, et al.
Publicado: (2012)