Cargando…

The effectiveness of artificial intelligence-based automated grading and training system in education of manual detection of diabetic retinopathy

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-based automated diabetic retinopathy (DR) grading and training system from a real-world diabetic dataset of China, and in particular, to investigate its effectiveness as a learning tool of DR manual grading for medic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qian, Xu, Jingying, Han, Xian, Song, Yuqing, Zhao, Lili, Wu, Baorui, Chu, Wei, Guo, Yefeng, Zheng, Qiang, Zhang, Chunyan, Chu, Cheng, Bian, Kai, Ma, Yi, Qu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9678340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36419999
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1025271
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-based automated diabetic retinopathy (DR) grading and training system from a real-world diabetic dataset of China, and in particular, to investigate its effectiveness as a learning tool of DR manual grading for medical students. METHODS: We developed an automated DR grading and training system equipped with an AI-driven diagnosis algorithm to highlight highly prognostic related regions in the input image. Less experienced prospective physicians received pre- and post-training tests by the AI diagnosis platform. Then, changes in the diagnostic accuracy of the participants were evaluated. RESULTS: We randomly selected 8,063 cases diagnosed with DR and 7,925 with non-DR fundus images from type 2 diabetes patients. The automated DR grading system we developed achieved accuracy, sensitivity/specificity, and AUC values of 0.965, 0.965/0.966, and 0.980 for moderate or worse DR (95 percent CI: 0.976–0.984). When the graders received assistance from the output of the AI system, the metrics were enhanced in varying degrees. The automated DR grading system helped to improve the accuracy of human graders, i.e., junior residents and medical students, from 0.947 and 0.915 to 0.978 and 0.954, respectively. CONCLUSION: The AI-based systemdemonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of DR on fundus images from real-world diabetics, and could be utilized as a training aid system for trainees lacking formal instruction on DR management.