Cargando…

Efficacy of Prophylactic Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy with Delayed Primary Closure for Contaminated Abdominal Wounds

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to prevent surgical site infection (SSI) may be effective for severely contaminated wounds. We investigated the safety and efficacy of NPWT with delayed primary closure (DPC) for preventing SSI. METHODS: For patients with contaminated a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sato, Yo, Sunami, Eiji, Hirano, Kenichiro, Takahashi, Motoko, Kosugi, Shin-ichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9678480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36419858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6767570
_version_ 1784833994776379392
author Sato, Yo
Sunami, Eiji
Hirano, Kenichiro
Takahashi, Motoko
Kosugi, Shin-ichi
author_facet Sato, Yo
Sunami, Eiji
Hirano, Kenichiro
Takahashi, Motoko
Kosugi, Shin-ichi
author_sort Sato, Yo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to prevent surgical site infection (SSI) may be effective for severely contaminated wounds. We investigated the safety and efficacy of NPWT with delayed primary closure (DPC) for preventing SSI. METHODS: For patients with contaminated and dirty/infected surgical wounds after an emergency laparotomy, the abdominal fascia was closed with antibacterial absorbent threads and the skin was left open. Negative pressure (−80 mmHg) was applied through the polyurethane foam, which was replaced on postoperative days 3 and 7. DPC was performed when sufficient granulation was observed. The duration and adverse events of NPWT, the development of SSI, and the postoperative hospital stay were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: We analyzed the cases of patients with contaminated (n = 15) and dirty/infected wounds (n = 7). The median duration of NPWT was 7 days (range 5–11 days). NPWT was discontinued in one (4.5%) patient due to wound traction pain. SSI developed in seven patients (31.8%), with incisional SSI in one (4.5%) and organ/space SSI in six (27.3%). The median postoperative hospital stay was 17 days (range 7–91 days). There was no significant relationship between postoperative hospital stay and wound classification (P=0.17) or type of SSI (P=0.07). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic NPWT with DPC was feasible and may be particularly suitable for severely contaminated wounds, with a low incidence of incisional SSI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9678480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96784802022-11-22 Efficacy of Prophylactic Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy with Delayed Primary Closure for Contaminated Abdominal Wounds Sato, Yo Sunami, Eiji Hirano, Kenichiro Takahashi, Motoko Kosugi, Shin-ichi Surg Res Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to prevent surgical site infection (SSI) may be effective for severely contaminated wounds. We investigated the safety and efficacy of NPWT with delayed primary closure (DPC) for preventing SSI. METHODS: For patients with contaminated and dirty/infected surgical wounds after an emergency laparotomy, the abdominal fascia was closed with antibacterial absorbent threads and the skin was left open. Negative pressure (−80 mmHg) was applied through the polyurethane foam, which was replaced on postoperative days 3 and 7. DPC was performed when sufficient granulation was observed. The duration and adverse events of NPWT, the development of SSI, and the postoperative hospital stay were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: We analyzed the cases of patients with contaminated (n = 15) and dirty/infected wounds (n = 7). The median duration of NPWT was 7 days (range 5–11 days). NPWT was discontinued in one (4.5%) patient due to wound traction pain. SSI developed in seven patients (31.8%), with incisional SSI in one (4.5%) and organ/space SSI in six (27.3%). The median postoperative hospital stay was 17 days (range 7–91 days). There was no significant relationship between postoperative hospital stay and wound classification (P=0.17) or type of SSI (P=0.07). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic NPWT with DPC was feasible and may be particularly suitable for severely contaminated wounds, with a low incidence of incisional SSI. Hindawi 2022-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9678480/ /pubmed/36419858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6767570 Text en Copyright © 2022 Yo Sato et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sato, Yo
Sunami, Eiji
Hirano, Kenichiro
Takahashi, Motoko
Kosugi, Shin-ichi
Efficacy of Prophylactic Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy with Delayed Primary Closure for Contaminated Abdominal Wounds
title Efficacy of Prophylactic Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy with Delayed Primary Closure for Contaminated Abdominal Wounds
title_full Efficacy of Prophylactic Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy with Delayed Primary Closure for Contaminated Abdominal Wounds
title_fullStr Efficacy of Prophylactic Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy with Delayed Primary Closure for Contaminated Abdominal Wounds
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Prophylactic Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy with Delayed Primary Closure for Contaminated Abdominal Wounds
title_short Efficacy of Prophylactic Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy with Delayed Primary Closure for Contaminated Abdominal Wounds
title_sort efficacy of prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy with delayed primary closure for contaminated abdominal wounds
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9678480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36419858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6767570
work_keys_str_mv AT satoyo efficacyofprophylacticnegativepressurewoundtherapywithdelayedprimaryclosureforcontaminatedabdominalwounds
AT sunamieiji efficacyofprophylacticnegativepressurewoundtherapywithdelayedprimaryclosureforcontaminatedabdominalwounds
AT hiranokenichiro efficacyofprophylacticnegativepressurewoundtherapywithdelayedprimaryclosureforcontaminatedabdominalwounds
AT takahashimotoko efficacyofprophylacticnegativepressurewoundtherapywithdelayedprimaryclosureforcontaminatedabdominalwounds
AT kosugishinichi efficacyofprophylacticnegativepressurewoundtherapywithdelayedprimaryclosureforcontaminatedabdominalwounds