Cargando…
Efficacy of Prophylactic Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy with Delayed Primary Closure for Contaminated Abdominal Wounds
BACKGROUND: Prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to prevent surgical site infection (SSI) may be effective for severely contaminated wounds. We investigated the safety and efficacy of NPWT with delayed primary closure (DPC) for preventing SSI. METHODS: For patients with contaminated a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9678480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36419858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6767570 |
_version_ | 1784833994776379392 |
---|---|
author | Sato, Yo Sunami, Eiji Hirano, Kenichiro Takahashi, Motoko Kosugi, Shin-ichi |
author_facet | Sato, Yo Sunami, Eiji Hirano, Kenichiro Takahashi, Motoko Kosugi, Shin-ichi |
author_sort | Sato, Yo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to prevent surgical site infection (SSI) may be effective for severely contaminated wounds. We investigated the safety and efficacy of NPWT with delayed primary closure (DPC) for preventing SSI. METHODS: For patients with contaminated and dirty/infected surgical wounds after an emergency laparotomy, the abdominal fascia was closed with antibacterial absorbent threads and the skin was left open. Negative pressure (−80 mmHg) was applied through the polyurethane foam, which was replaced on postoperative days 3 and 7. DPC was performed when sufficient granulation was observed. The duration and adverse events of NPWT, the development of SSI, and the postoperative hospital stay were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: We analyzed the cases of patients with contaminated (n = 15) and dirty/infected wounds (n = 7). The median duration of NPWT was 7 days (range 5–11 days). NPWT was discontinued in one (4.5%) patient due to wound traction pain. SSI developed in seven patients (31.8%), with incisional SSI in one (4.5%) and organ/space SSI in six (27.3%). The median postoperative hospital stay was 17 days (range 7–91 days). There was no significant relationship between postoperative hospital stay and wound classification (P=0.17) or type of SSI (P=0.07). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic NPWT with DPC was feasible and may be particularly suitable for severely contaminated wounds, with a low incidence of incisional SSI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9678480 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96784802022-11-22 Efficacy of Prophylactic Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy with Delayed Primary Closure for Contaminated Abdominal Wounds Sato, Yo Sunami, Eiji Hirano, Kenichiro Takahashi, Motoko Kosugi, Shin-ichi Surg Res Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to prevent surgical site infection (SSI) may be effective for severely contaminated wounds. We investigated the safety and efficacy of NPWT with delayed primary closure (DPC) for preventing SSI. METHODS: For patients with contaminated and dirty/infected surgical wounds after an emergency laparotomy, the abdominal fascia was closed with antibacterial absorbent threads and the skin was left open. Negative pressure (−80 mmHg) was applied through the polyurethane foam, which was replaced on postoperative days 3 and 7. DPC was performed when sufficient granulation was observed. The duration and adverse events of NPWT, the development of SSI, and the postoperative hospital stay were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: We analyzed the cases of patients with contaminated (n = 15) and dirty/infected wounds (n = 7). The median duration of NPWT was 7 days (range 5–11 days). NPWT was discontinued in one (4.5%) patient due to wound traction pain. SSI developed in seven patients (31.8%), with incisional SSI in one (4.5%) and organ/space SSI in six (27.3%). The median postoperative hospital stay was 17 days (range 7–91 days). There was no significant relationship between postoperative hospital stay and wound classification (P=0.17) or type of SSI (P=0.07). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic NPWT with DPC was feasible and may be particularly suitable for severely contaminated wounds, with a low incidence of incisional SSI. Hindawi 2022-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9678480/ /pubmed/36419858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6767570 Text en Copyright © 2022 Yo Sato et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sato, Yo Sunami, Eiji Hirano, Kenichiro Takahashi, Motoko Kosugi, Shin-ichi Efficacy of Prophylactic Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy with Delayed Primary Closure for Contaminated Abdominal Wounds |
title | Efficacy of Prophylactic Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy with Delayed Primary Closure for Contaminated Abdominal Wounds |
title_full | Efficacy of Prophylactic Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy with Delayed Primary Closure for Contaminated Abdominal Wounds |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of Prophylactic Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy with Delayed Primary Closure for Contaminated Abdominal Wounds |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of Prophylactic Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy with Delayed Primary Closure for Contaminated Abdominal Wounds |
title_short | Efficacy of Prophylactic Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy with Delayed Primary Closure for Contaminated Abdominal Wounds |
title_sort | efficacy of prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy with delayed primary closure for contaminated abdominal wounds |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9678480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36419858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6767570 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT satoyo efficacyofprophylacticnegativepressurewoundtherapywithdelayedprimaryclosureforcontaminatedabdominalwounds AT sunamieiji efficacyofprophylacticnegativepressurewoundtherapywithdelayedprimaryclosureforcontaminatedabdominalwounds AT hiranokenichiro efficacyofprophylacticnegativepressurewoundtherapywithdelayedprimaryclosureforcontaminatedabdominalwounds AT takahashimotoko efficacyofprophylacticnegativepressurewoundtherapywithdelayedprimaryclosureforcontaminatedabdominalwounds AT kosugishinichi efficacyofprophylacticnegativepressurewoundtherapywithdelayedprimaryclosureforcontaminatedabdominalwounds |