Cargando…

Respiratory function monitoring during neonatal resuscitation: A systematic review

AIM: Positive pressure ventilation via a facemask is critical in neonatal resuscitation, but frequently results in mask leak, obstruction, and inadequate respiratory support. This systematic review aimed to determine whether the display of respiratory function monitoring improved resuscitation or cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fuerch, Janene H., Thio, Marta, Halamek, Louis P., Liley, Helen G., Wyckoff, Myra H., Rabi, Yacov
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9678959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36425449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100327
_version_ 1784834105495519232
author Fuerch, Janene H.
Thio, Marta
Halamek, Louis P.
Liley, Helen G.
Wyckoff, Myra H.
Rabi, Yacov
author_facet Fuerch, Janene H.
Thio, Marta
Halamek, Louis P.
Liley, Helen G.
Wyckoff, Myra H.
Rabi, Yacov
author_sort Fuerch, Janene H.
collection PubMed
description AIM: Positive pressure ventilation via a facemask is critical in neonatal resuscitation, but frequently results in mask leak, obstruction, and inadequate respiratory support. This systematic review aimed to determine whether the display of respiratory function monitoring improved resuscitation or clinical outcomes. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes when respiratory function monitoring was displayed versus not displayed for newborns requiring positive pressure ventilation at birth were selected and from databases (last search August 2022), and assessed for risk of bias using Cochrane Risk of Bias Tools for randomized control trials. The study was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations was used to assess the certainty of evidence. Treatment recommendations were approved by the Neonatal Life Support Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Results reported primary and secondary outcomes and included resuscitation and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of 2294 unique articles assessed for eligibility, three randomized controlled trials were included (observational studies excluded) (n = 443 patients). For predefined resuscitation and clinical outcomes, these studies either did not report the primary outcome (time to heart rate ≥ 100 bpm from birth), had differing reporting methods (achieving desired tidal volumes, significant mask leak) or did not find significant differences (intubation rate, air leaks, death before hospital discharge, severe intraventricular hemorrhage, chronic lung disease). Limitations included limited sample size for critical outcomes, inconsistent definitions amongst studies and unreported long-term outcomes. CONCLUSION: Although respiratory function monitoring has been utilized in clinical care, there is currently insufficient evidence to suggest its benefit for newborn infants receiving respiratory support for resuscitation at birth. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021278169 (registered November 27, 2021). FUNDING: The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation provided support that included access to software platforms and teleconferencing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9678959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96789592022-11-23 Respiratory function monitoring during neonatal resuscitation: A systematic review Fuerch, Janene H. Thio, Marta Halamek, Louis P. Liley, Helen G. Wyckoff, Myra H. Rabi, Yacov Resusc Plus Review AIM: Positive pressure ventilation via a facemask is critical in neonatal resuscitation, but frequently results in mask leak, obstruction, and inadequate respiratory support. This systematic review aimed to determine whether the display of respiratory function monitoring improved resuscitation or clinical outcomes. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes when respiratory function monitoring was displayed versus not displayed for newborns requiring positive pressure ventilation at birth were selected and from databases (last search August 2022), and assessed for risk of bias using Cochrane Risk of Bias Tools for randomized control trials. The study was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations was used to assess the certainty of evidence. Treatment recommendations were approved by the Neonatal Life Support Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Results reported primary and secondary outcomes and included resuscitation and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of 2294 unique articles assessed for eligibility, three randomized controlled trials were included (observational studies excluded) (n = 443 patients). For predefined resuscitation and clinical outcomes, these studies either did not report the primary outcome (time to heart rate ≥ 100 bpm from birth), had differing reporting methods (achieving desired tidal volumes, significant mask leak) or did not find significant differences (intubation rate, air leaks, death before hospital discharge, severe intraventricular hemorrhage, chronic lung disease). Limitations included limited sample size for critical outcomes, inconsistent definitions amongst studies and unreported long-term outcomes. CONCLUSION: Although respiratory function monitoring has been utilized in clinical care, there is currently insufficient evidence to suggest its benefit for newborn infants receiving respiratory support for resuscitation at birth. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021278169 (registered November 27, 2021). FUNDING: The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation provided support that included access to software platforms and teleconferencing. Elsevier 2022-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9678959/ /pubmed/36425449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100327 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Fuerch, Janene H.
Thio, Marta
Halamek, Louis P.
Liley, Helen G.
Wyckoff, Myra H.
Rabi, Yacov
Respiratory function monitoring during neonatal resuscitation: A systematic review
title Respiratory function monitoring during neonatal resuscitation: A systematic review
title_full Respiratory function monitoring during neonatal resuscitation: A systematic review
title_fullStr Respiratory function monitoring during neonatal resuscitation: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Respiratory function monitoring during neonatal resuscitation: A systematic review
title_short Respiratory function monitoring during neonatal resuscitation: A systematic review
title_sort respiratory function monitoring during neonatal resuscitation: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9678959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36425449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100327
work_keys_str_mv AT fuerchjaneneh respiratoryfunctionmonitoringduringneonatalresuscitationasystematicreview
AT thiomarta respiratoryfunctionmonitoringduringneonatalresuscitationasystematicreview
AT halameklouisp respiratoryfunctionmonitoringduringneonatalresuscitationasystematicreview
AT lileyheleng respiratoryfunctionmonitoringduringneonatalresuscitationasystematicreview
AT wyckoffmyrah respiratoryfunctionmonitoringduringneonatalresuscitationasystematicreview
AT rabiyacov respiratoryfunctionmonitoringduringneonatalresuscitationasystematicreview