Cargando…
Respiratory function monitoring during neonatal resuscitation: A systematic review
AIM: Positive pressure ventilation via a facemask is critical in neonatal resuscitation, but frequently results in mask leak, obstruction, and inadequate respiratory support. This systematic review aimed to determine whether the display of respiratory function monitoring improved resuscitation or cl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9678959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36425449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100327 |
_version_ | 1784834105495519232 |
---|---|
author | Fuerch, Janene H. Thio, Marta Halamek, Louis P. Liley, Helen G. Wyckoff, Myra H. Rabi, Yacov |
author_facet | Fuerch, Janene H. Thio, Marta Halamek, Louis P. Liley, Helen G. Wyckoff, Myra H. Rabi, Yacov |
author_sort | Fuerch, Janene H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: Positive pressure ventilation via a facemask is critical in neonatal resuscitation, but frequently results in mask leak, obstruction, and inadequate respiratory support. This systematic review aimed to determine whether the display of respiratory function monitoring improved resuscitation or clinical outcomes. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes when respiratory function monitoring was displayed versus not displayed for newborns requiring positive pressure ventilation at birth were selected and from databases (last search August 2022), and assessed for risk of bias using Cochrane Risk of Bias Tools for randomized control trials. The study was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations was used to assess the certainty of evidence. Treatment recommendations were approved by the Neonatal Life Support Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Results reported primary and secondary outcomes and included resuscitation and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of 2294 unique articles assessed for eligibility, three randomized controlled trials were included (observational studies excluded) (n = 443 patients). For predefined resuscitation and clinical outcomes, these studies either did not report the primary outcome (time to heart rate ≥ 100 bpm from birth), had differing reporting methods (achieving desired tidal volumes, significant mask leak) or did not find significant differences (intubation rate, air leaks, death before hospital discharge, severe intraventricular hemorrhage, chronic lung disease). Limitations included limited sample size for critical outcomes, inconsistent definitions amongst studies and unreported long-term outcomes. CONCLUSION: Although respiratory function monitoring has been utilized in clinical care, there is currently insufficient evidence to suggest its benefit for newborn infants receiving respiratory support for resuscitation at birth. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021278169 (registered November 27, 2021). FUNDING: The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation provided support that included access to software platforms and teleconferencing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9678959 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96789592022-11-23 Respiratory function monitoring during neonatal resuscitation: A systematic review Fuerch, Janene H. Thio, Marta Halamek, Louis P. Liley, Helen G. Wyckoff, Myra H. Rabi, Yacov Resusc Plus Review AIM: Positive pressure ventilation via a facemask is critical in neonatal resuscitation, but frequently results in mask leak, obstruction, and inadequate respiratory support. This systematic review aimed to determine whether the display of respiratory function monitoring improved resuscitation or clinical outcomes. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes when respiratory function monitoring was displayed versus not displayed for newborns requiring positive pressure ventilation at birth were selected and from databases (last search August 2022), and assessed for risk of bias using Cochrane Risk of Bias Tools for randomized control trials. The study was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations was used to assess the certainty of evidence. Treatment recommendations were approved by the Neonatal Life Support Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Results reported primary and secondary outcomes and included resuscitation and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of 2294 unique articles assessed for eligibility, three randomized controlled trials were included (observational studies excluded) (n = 443 patients). For predefined resuscitation and clinical outcomes, these studies either did not report the primary outcome (time to heart rate ≥ 100 bpm from birth), had differing reporting methods (achieving desired tidal volumes, significant mask leak) or did not find significant differences (intubation rate, air leaks, death before hospital discharge, severe intraventricular hemorrhage, chronic lung disease). Limitations included limited sample size for critical outcomes, inconsistent definitions amongst studies and unreported long-term outcomes. CONCLUSION: Although respiratory function monitoring has been utilized in clinical care, there is currently insufficient evidence to suggest its benefit for newborn infants receiving respiratory support for resuscitation at birth. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021278169 (registered November 27, 2021). FUNDING: The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation provided support that included access to software platforms and teleconferencing. Elsevier 2022-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9678959/ /pubmed/36425449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100327 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Fuerch, Janene H. Thio, Marta Halamek, Louis P. Liley, Helen G. Wyckoff, Myra H. Rabi, Yacov Respiratory function monitoring during neonatal resuscitation: A systematic review |
title | Respiratory function monitoring during neonatal resuscitation: A systematic review |
title_full | Respiratory function monitoring during neonatal resuscitation: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Respiratory function monitoring during neonatal resuscitation: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Respiratory function monitoring during neonatal resuscitation: A systematic review |
title_short | Respiratory function monitoring during neonatal resuscitation: A systematic review |
title_sort | respiratory function monitoring during neonatal resuscitation: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9678959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36425449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100327 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fuerchjaneneh respiratoryfunctionmonitoringduringneonatalresuscitationasystematicreview AT thiomarta respiratoryfunctionmonitoringduringneonatalresuscitationasystematicreview AT halameklouisp respiratoryfunctionmonitoringduringneonatalresuscitationasystematicreview AT lileyheleng respiratoryfunctionmonitoringduringneonatalresuscitationasystematicreview AT wyckoffmyrah respiratoryfunctionmonitoringduringneonatalresuscitationasystematicreview AT rabiyacov respiratoryfunctionmonitoringduringneonatalresuscitationasystematicreview |