Cargando…

Anti-Tumor Efficacy of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Antibodies in Combination With Other Anticancer Drugs in Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: The clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) has been proven; however, it is also known that their efficacy as monotherapy is limited, with a response rate of 20% or less in solid tumors. The combination of CPIs and anticancer agents has been actively attempted in solid t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Inoue, Takashi, Narukawa, Mamoru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9679352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36748438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10732748221140694
_version_ 1784834171618721792
author Inoue, Takashi
Narukawa, Mamoru
author_facet Inoue, Takashi
Narukawa, Mamoru
author_sort Inoue, Takashi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) has been proven; however, it is also known that their efficacy as monotherapy is limited, with a response rate of 20% or less in solid tumors. The combination of CPIs and anticancer agents has been actively attempted in solid tumors area. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to find favorable combination therapies of programmed death 1 (PD-1) or programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in terms of anti-tumor efficacy in clinical settings. METHODS: An electronic database search was performed using ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, and ASCO/ESMO annual meeting libraries. We included randomized or non-randomized trials designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapies of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and other anticancer drug-containing therapies. All clinical studies selected were solid tumors with objective response rate (ORR) data. The quality of the evidence was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool or the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis used random effects models to pool results. RESULTS: Sixteen studies involving 3793 patients were included in the primary analysis. These studies have a monotherapy group with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as the control group or the in-study arm/cohort (1863 patients in the combination group with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and 1930 patients in PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy). The pooled results showed that the combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and other anticancer drugs significantly improved the ORR (relative risk [RR] = 1.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.46, 2.20). In the subgroup analysis, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus DNA-synthesis or microtubule inhibitor led to a statistically significant improvement in the ORR compared to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor alone. CONCLUSIONS: It was suggested that combinations of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and potential immunogenic cell death (ICD) inducers improve the clinical anti-tumor efficacy, although updated meta-analyses based on the results of ongoing clinical trials are further needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9679352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96793522022-11-23 Anti-Tumor Efficacy of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Antibodies in Combination With Other Anticancer Drugs in Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Inoue, Takashi Narukawa, Mamoru Cancer Control Review BACKGROUND: The clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) has been proven; however, it is also known that their efficacy as monotherapy is limited, with a response rate of 20% or less in solid tumors. The combination of CPIs and anticancer agents has been actively attempted in solid tumors area. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to find favorable combination therapies of programmed death 1 (PD-1) or programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in terms of anti-tumor efficacy in clinical settings. METHODS: An electronic database search was performed using ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, and ASCO/ESMO annual meeting libraries. We included randomized or non-randomized trials designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapies of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and other anticancer drug-containing therapies. All clinical studies selected were solid tumors with objective response rate (ORR) data. The quality of the evidence was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool or the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis used random effects models to pool results. RESULTS: Sixteen studies involving 3793 patients were included in the primary analysis. These studies have a monotherapy group with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as the control group or the in-study arm/cohort (1863 patients in the combination group with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and 1930 patients in PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy). The pooled results showed that the combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and other anticancer drugs significantly improved the ORR (relative risk [RR] = 1.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.46, 2.20). In the subgroup analysis, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus DNA-synthesis or microtubule inhibitor led to a statistically significant improvement in the ORR compared to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor alone. CONCLUSIONS: It was suggested that combinations of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and potential immunogenic cell death (ICD) inducers improve the clinical anti-tumor efficacy, although updated meta-analyses based on the results of ongoing clinical trials are further needed. SAGE Publications 2022-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9679352/ /pubmed/36748438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10732748221140694 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review
Inoue, Takashi
Narukawa, Mamoru
Anti-Tumor Efficacy of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Antibodies in Combination With Other Anticancer Drugs in Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Anti-Tumor Efficacy of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Antibodies in Combination With Other Anticancer Drugs in Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Anti-Tumor Efficacy of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Antibodies in Combination With Other Anticancer Drugs in Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Anti-Tumor Efficacy of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Antibodies in Combination With Other Anticancer Drugs in Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Anti-Tumor Efficacy of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Antibodies in Combination With Other Anticancer Drugs in Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Anti-Tumor Efficacy of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Antibodies in Combination With Other Anticancer Drugs in Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort anti-tumor efficacy of anti-pd-1/pd-l1 antibodies in combination with other anticancer drugs in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9679352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36748438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10732748221140694
work_keys_str_mv AT inouetakashi antitumorefficacyofantipd1pdl1antibodiesincombinationwithotheranticancerdrugsinsolidtumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT narukawamamoru antitumorefficacyofantipd1pdl1antibodiesincombinationwithotheranticancerdrugsinsolidtumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis