Cargando…
Unsupervised mobile app-based cognitive testing in a population-based study of older adults born 1944
BACKGROUND: Mobile app-based tools have the potential to yield rapid, cost-effective, and sensitive measures for detecting dementia-related cognitive impairment in clinical and research settings. At the same time, there is a substantial need to validate these tools in real-life settings. The primary...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9679642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36426215 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.933265 |
_version_ | 1784834240403210240 |
---|---|
author | Öhman, Fredrik Berron, David Papp, Kathryn V. Kern, Silke Skoog, Johan Hadarsson Bodin, Timothy Zettergren, Anna Skoog, Ingmar Schöll, Michael |
author_facet | Öhman, Fredrik Berron, David Papp, Kathryn V. Kern, Silke Skoog, Johan Hadarsson Bodin, Timothy Zettergren, Anna Skoog, Ingmar Schöll, Michael |
author_sort | Öhman, Fredrik |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mobile app-based tools have the potential to yield rapid, cost-effective, and sensitive measures for detecting dementia-related cognitive impairment in clinical and research settings. At the same time, there is a substantial need to validate these tools in real-life settings. The primary aim of this study was thus to evaluate the feasibility, validity, and reliability of mobile app-based tasks for assessing cognitive function in a population-based sample of older adults. METHOD: A total of 172 non-demented (Clinical Dementia Rating 0 and 0.5) older participants (aged 76–77) completed two mobile app-based memory tasks—the Mnemonic Discrimination Task for Objects and Scenes (MDT-OS) and the long-term (24 h) delayed Object-In-Room Recall Task (ORR-LDR). To determine the validity of the tasks for measuring relevant cognitive functions in this population, we assessed relationships with conventional cognitive tests. In addition, psychometric properties, including test-retest reliability, and the participants’ self-rated experience with mobile app-based cognitive tasks were assessed. RESULT: MDT-OS and ORR-LDR were weakly-to-moderately correlated with the Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite (PACC5) (r = 0.3–0.44, p < .001) and with several other measures of episodic memory, processing speed, and executive function. Test-retest reliability was poor–to-moderate for one single session but improved to moderate–to-good when using the average of two sessions. We observed no significant floor or ceiling effects nor effects of education or gender on task performance. Contextual factors such as distractions and screen size did not significantly affect task performance. Most participants deemed the tasks interesting, but many rated them as highly challenging. While several participants reported distractions during tasks, most could concentrate well. However, there were difficulties in completing delayed recall tasks on time in this unsupervised and remote setting. CONCLUSION: Our study proves the feasibility of mobile app-based cognitive assessments in a community sample of older adults, demonstrating its validity in relation to conventional cognitive measures and its reliability for repeated measurements over time. To further strengthen study adherence, future studies should implement additional measures to improve task completion on time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9679642 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96796422022-11-23 Unsupervised mobile app-based cognitive testing in a population-based study of older adults born 1944 Öhman, Fredrik Berron, David Papp, Kathryn V. Kern, Silke Skoog, Johan Hadarsson Bodin, Timothy Zettergren, Anna Skoog, Ingmar Schöll, Michael Front Digit Health Digital Health BACKGROUND: Mobile app-based tools have the potential to yield rapid, cost-effective, and sensitive measures for detecting dementia-related cognitive impairment in clinical and research settings. At the same time, there is a substantial need to validate these tools in real-life settings. The primary aim of this study was thus to evaluate the feasibility, validity, and reliability of mobile app-based tasks for assessing cognitive function in a population-based sample of older adults. METHOD: A total of 172 non-demented (Clinical Dementia Rating 0 and 0.5) older participants (aged 76–77) completed two mobile app-based memory tasks—the Mnemonic Discrimination Task for Objects and Scenes (MDT-OS) and the long-term (24 h) delayed Object-In-Room Recall Task (ORR-LDR). To determine the validity of the tasks for measuring relevant cognitive functions in this population, we assessed relationships with conventional cognitive tests. In addition, psychometric properties, including test-retest reliability, and the participants’ self-rated experience with mobile app-based cognitive tasks were assessed. RESULT: MDT-OS and ORR-LDR were weakly-to-moderately correlated with the Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite (PACC5) (r = 0.3–0.44, p < .001) and with several other measures of episodic memory, processing speed, and executive function. Test-retest reliability was poor–to-moderate for one single session but improved to moderate–to-good when using the average of two sessions. We observed no significant floor or ceiling effects nor effects of education or gender on task performance. Contextual factors such as distractions and screen size did not significantly affect task performance. Most participants deemed the tasks interesting, but many rated them as highly challenging. While several participants reported distractions during tasks, most could concentrate well. However, there were difficulties in completing delayed recall tasks on time in this unsupervised and remote setting. CONCLUSION: Our study proves the feasibility of mobile app-based cognitive assessments in a community sample of older adults, demonstrating its validity in relation to conventional cognitive measures and its reliability for repeated measurements over time. To further strengthen study adherence, future studies should implement additional measures to improve task completion on time. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9679642/ /pubmed/36426215 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.933265 Text en © 2022 Öhman, Berron, Papp, Kern, Skoog, Hadarsson Bodin, Zettergren, Skoog and Schöll. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Digital Health Öhman, Fredrik Berron, David Papp, Kathryn V. Kern, Silke Skoog, Johan Hadarsson Bodin, Timothy Zettergren, Anna Skoog, Ingmar Schöll, Michael Unsupervised mobile app-based cognitive testing in a population-based study of older adults born 1944 |
title | Unsupervised mobile app-based cognitive testing in a population-based study of older adults born 1944 |
title_full | Unsupervised mobile app-based cognitive testing in a population-based study of older adults born 1944 |
title_fullStr | Unsupervised mobile app-based cognitive testing in a population-based study of older adults born 1944 |
title_full_unstemmed | Unsupervised mobile app-based cognitive testing in a population-based study of older adults born 1944 |
title_short | Unsupervised mobile app-based cognitive testing in a population-based study of older adults born 1944 |
title_sort | unsupervised mobile app-based cognitive testing in a population-based study of older adults born 1944 |
topic | Digital Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9679642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36426215 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.933265 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ohmanfredrik unsupervisedmobileappbasedcognitivetestinginapopulationbasedstudyofolderadultsborn1944 AT berrondavid unsupervisedmobileappbasedcognitivetestinginapopulationbasedstudyofolderadultsborn1944 AT pappkathrynv unsupervisedmobileappbasedcognitivetestinginapopulationbasedstudyofolderadultsborn1944 AT kernsilke unsupervisedmobileappbasedcognitivetestinginapopulationbasedstudyofolderadultsborn1944 AT skoogjohan unsupervisedmobileappbasedcognitivetestinginapopulationbasedstudyofolderadultsborn1944 AT hadarssonbodintimothy unsupervisedmobileappbasedcognitivetestinginapopulationbasedstudyofolderadultsborn1944 AT zettergrenanna unsupervisedmobileappbasedcognitivetestinginapopulationbasedstudyofolderadultsborn1944 AT skoogingmar unsupervisedmobileappbasedcognitivetestinginapopulationbasedstudyofolderadultsborn1944 AT schollmichael unsupervisedmobileappbasedcognitivetestinginapopulationbasedstudyofolderadultsborn1944 |