Cargando…

Race and resource allocation: an online survey of US and UK adults’ attitudes toward COVID-19 ventilator and vaccine distribution

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess US/UK adults’ attitudes towards COVID-19 ventilator and vaccine allocation. DESIGN: Online survey including US and UK adults, sampled to be representative for sex, age, race, household income and employment. A total of 2580 participated (women=1289, age range=18...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kappes, Andreas, Zohny, Hazem, Savulescu, Julian, Singh, Ilina, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, Wilkinson, Dominic
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9679868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36410823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062561
_version_ 1784834298229030912
author Kappes, Andreas
Zohny, Hazem
Savulescu, Julian
Singh, Ilina
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter
Wilkinson, Dominic
author_facet Kappes, Andreas
Zohny, Hazem
Savulescu, Julian
Singh, Ilina
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter
Wilkinson, Dominic
author_sort Kappes, Andreas
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess US/UK adults’ attitudes towards COVID-19 ventilator and vaccine allocation. DESIGN: Online survey including US and UK adults, sampled to be representative for sex, age, race, household income and employment. A total of 2580 participated (women=1289, age range=18 to 85 years, Black American=114, BAME=138). INTERVENTIONS: Participants were asked to allocate ventilators or vaccines in scenarios involving individuals or groups with different medical risk and additional risk factors. RESULTS: Participant race did not impact vaccine or ventilator allocation decisions in the USA, but did impact ventilator allocation attitudes in the UK (F(4,602)=6.95, p<0.001). When a racial minority or white patient had identical chances of survival, 14.8% allocated a ventilator to the minority patient (UK BAME participants: 24.4%) and 68.9% chose to toss a coin. When the racial minority patient had a 10% lower chance of survival, 12.4% participants allocated them the ventilator (UK BAME participants: 22.1%). For patients with identical risk of severe COVID-19, 43.6% allocated a vaccine to a minority patient, 7.2% chose a white patient and 49.2% chose a coin toss. When the racial minority patient had a 10% lower risk of severe COVID-19, 23.7% participants allocated the vaccine to the minority patient. Similar results were seen for obesity or male sex as additional risk factors. In both countries, responses on the Modern Racism Scale were strongly associated with attitudes toward race-based ventilator and vaccine allocations (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Although living in countries with high racial inequality during a pandemic, most US and UK adults in our survey allocated ventilators and vaccines preferentially to those with the highest chance of survival or highest chance of severe illness. Race of recipient led to vaccine prioritisation in cases where risk of illness was similar.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9679868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96798682022-11-23 Race and resource allocation: an online survey of US and UK adults’ attitudes toward COVID-19 ventilator and vaccine distribution Kappes, Andreas Zohny, Hazem Savulescu, Julian Singh, Ilina Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter Wilkinson, Dominic BMJ Open Ethics OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess US/UK adults’ attitudes towards COVID-19 ventilator and vaccine allocation. DESIGN: Online survey including US and UK adults, sampled to be representative for sex, age, race, household income and employment. A total of 2580 participated (women=1289, age range=18 to 85 years, Black American=114, BAME=138). INTERVENTIONS: Participants were asked to allocate ventilators or vaccines in scenarios involving individuals or groups with different medical risk and additional risk factors. RESULTS: Participant race did not impact vaccine or ventilator allocation decisions in the USA, but did impact ventilator allocation attitudes in the UK (F(4,602)=6.95, p<0.001). When a racial minority or white patient had identical chances of survival, 14.8% allocated a ventilator to the minority patient (UK BAME participants: 24.4%) and 68.9% chose to toss a coin. When the racial minority patient had a 10% lower chance of survival, 12.4% participants allocated them the ventilator (UK BAME participants: 22.1%). For patients with identical risk of severe COVID-19, 43.6% allocated a vaccine to a minority patient, 7.2% chose a white patient and 49.2% chose a coin toss. When the racial minority patient had a 10% lower risk of severe COVID-19, 23.7% participants allocated the vaccine to the minority patient. Similar results were seen for obesity or male sex as additional risk factors. In both countries, responses on the Modern Racism Scale were strongly associated with attitudes toward race-based ventilator and vaccine allocations (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Although living in countries with high racial inequality during a pandemic, most US and UK adults in our survey allocated ventilators and vaccines preferentially to those with the highest chance of survival or highest chance of severe illness. Race of recipient led to vaccine prioritisation in cases where risk of illness was similar. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9679868/ /pubmed/36410823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062561 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Ethics
Kappes, Andreas
Zohny, Hazem
Savulescu, Julian
Singh, Ilina
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter
Wilkinson, Dominic
Race and resource allocation: an online survey of US and UK adults’ attitudes toward COVID-19 ventilator and vaccine distribution
title Race and resource allocation: an online survey of US and UK adults’ attitudes toward COVID-19 ventilator and vaccine distribution
title_full Race and resource allocation: an online survey of US and UK adults’ attitudes toward COVID-19 ventilator and vaccine distribution
title_fullStr Race and resource allocation: an online survey of US and UK adults’ attitudes toward COVID-19 ventilator and vaccine distribution
title_full_unstemmed Race and resource allocation: an online survey of US and UK adults’ attitudes toward COVID-19 ventilator and vaccine distribution
title_short Race and resource allocation: an online survey of US and UK adults’ attitudes toward COVID-19 ventilator and vaccine distribution
title_sort race and resource allocation: an online survey of us and uk adults’ attitudes toward covid-19 ventilator and vaccine distribution
topic Ethics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9679868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36410823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062561
work_keys_str_mv AT kappesandreas raceandresourceallocationanonlinesurveyofusandukadultsattitudestowardcovid19ventilatorandvaccinedistribution
AT zohnyhazem raceandresourceallocationanonlinesurveyofusandukadultsattitudestowardcovid19ventilatorandvaccinedistribution
AT savulescujulian raceandresourceallocationanonlinesurveyofusandukadultsattitudestowardcovid19ventilatorandvaccinedistribution
AT singhilina raceandresourceallocationanonlinesurveyofusandukadultsattitudestowardcovid19ventilatorandvaccinedistribution
AT sinnottarmstrongwalter raceandresourceallocationanonlinesurveyofusandukadultsattitudestowardcovid19ventilatorandvaccinedistribution
AT wilkinsondominic raceandresourceallocationanonlinesurveyofusandukadultsattitudestowardcovid19ventilatorandvaccinedistribution