Cargando…
Which events are experienced as traumatic by obstetricians and gynaecologists, and why? A qualitative analysis from a cross-sectional survey and in-depth interviews
OBJECTIVES: To explore the events perceived as traumatic by obstetricians and gynaecologists (O&G), and to examine factors contributing to the perception of trauma. DESIGN: Mixed methods: cross-sectional survey and in-depth interviews. SAMPLE AND SETTING: Fellows, members and trainees of the Roy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36410837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061505 |
_version_ | 1784834355822067712 |
---|---|
author | Sheen, Kayleigh Goodfellow, Laura Balling, Katie Rymer, Janice Weeks, Andrew Spiby, Helen Slade, Pauline |
author_facet | Sheen, Kayleigh Goodfellow, Laura Balling, Katie Rymer, Janice Weeks, Andrew Spiby, Helen Slade, Pauline |
author_sort | Sheen, Kayleigh |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To explore the events perceived as traumatic by obstetricians and gynaecologists (O&G), and to examine factors contributing to the perception of trauma. DESIGN: Mixed methods: cross-sectional survey and in-depth interviews. SAMPLE AND SETTING: Fellows, members and trainees of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). METHODS: An online survey was distributed to 6300 fellows (May–June 2017), members and trainees of RCOG; 1095 (17%) completed surveys were returned. Of these, 728 (66%) reported work-related trauma experience, with 525 providing a brief description of an event. Forty-three participants with trauma experience were purposively sampled and completed an in-depth interview (October 2017–March 2018), which were analysed using Template Analysis. Information regarding the scale and impact of trauma experience is presented elsewhere. The present analysis provides new information describing the events and perceptions of why events were traumatic. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The nature of traumatic events in this clinical setting, taken from survey descriptions of perceived traumatic events and information from the in-depth interviews. RESULTS: Events perceived as traumatic by O&G were similar between consultants, trainees and other RCOG members no longer working in O&G. Maternal or neonatal death/stillbirth, haemorrhage and events involving a difficult delivery were most frequently reported. Sudden and unpredictable events, perceived preventability, acute sensory experiences and high emotionality contributed to trauma perception. Respondents’ trauma was compounded by an absence of support, involvement in investigation procedures and pre-existing relationships with a recipient of care. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of events most likely to be perceived as traumatic, and wider circumstances contributing to the perception of trauma, provide a basis on which to focus preventative and supportive strategies for O&G. Training on the nature of traumatic events, self-help for early stress responses, processing support and rapid access to trauma-focused psychological input (where required) are needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9680185 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96801852022-11-23 Which events are experienced as traumatic by obstetricians and gynaecologists, and why? A qualitative analysis from a cross-sectional survey and in-depth interviews Sheen, Kayleigh Goodfellow, Laura Balling, Katie Rymer, Janice Weeks, Andrew Spiby, Helen Slade, Pauline BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVES: To explore the events perceived as traumatic by obstetricians and gynaecologists (O&G), and to examine factors contributing to the perception of trauma. DESIGN: Mixed methods: cross-sectional survey and in-depth interviews. SAMPLE AND SETTING: Fellows, members and trainees of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). METHODS: An online survey was distributed to 6300 fellows (May–June 2017), members and trainees of RCOG; 1095 (17%) completed surveys were returned. Of these, 728 (66%) reported work-related trauma experience, with 525 providing a brief description of an event. Forty-three participants with trauma experience were purposively sampled and completed an in-depth interview (October 2017–March 2018), which were analysed using Template Analysis. Information regarding the scale and impact of trauma experience is presented elsewhere. The present analysis provides new information describing the events and perceptions of why events were traumatic. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The nature of traumatic events in this clinical setting, taken from survey descriptions of perceived traumatic events and information from the in-depth interviews. RESULTS: Events perceived as traumatic by O&G were similar between consultants, trainees and other RCOG members no longer working in O&G. Maternal or neonatal death/stillbirth, haemorrhage and events involving a difficult delivery were most frequently reported. Sudden and unpredictable events, perceived preventability, acute sensory experiences and high emotionality contributed to trauma perception. Respondents’ trauma was compounded by an absence of support, involvement in investigation procedures and pre-existing relationships with a recipient of care. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of events most likely to be perceived as traumatic, and wider circumstances contributing to the perception of trauma, provide a basis on which to focus preventative and supportive strategies for O&G. Training on the nature of traumatic events, self-help for early stress responses, processing support and rapid access to trauma-focused psychological input (where required) are needed. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9680185/ /pubmed/36410837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061505 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Obstetrics and Gynaecology Sheen, Kayleigh Goodfellow, Laura Balling, Katie Rymer, Janice Weeks, Andrew Spiby, Helen Slade, Pauline Which events are experienced as traumatic by obstetricians and gynaecologists, and why? A qualitative analysis from a cross-sectional survey and in-depth interviews |
title | Which events are experienced as traumatic by obstetricians and gynaecologists, and why? A qualitative analysis from a cross-sectional survey and in-depth interviews |
title_full | Which events are experienced as traumatic by obstetricians and gynaecologists, and why? A qualitative analysis from a cross-sectional survey and in-depth interviews |
title_fullStr | Which events are experienced as traumatic by obstetricians and gynaecologists, and why? A qualitative analysis from a cross-sectional survey and in-depth interviews |
title_full_unstemmed | Which events are experienced as traumatic by obstetricians and gynaecologists, and why? A qualitative analysis from a cross-sectional survey and in-depth interviews |
title_short | Which events are experienced as traumatic by obstetricians and gynaecologists, and why? A qualitative analysis from a cross-sectional survey and in-depth interviews |
title_sort | which events are experienced as traumatic by obstetricians and gynaecologists, and why? a qualitative analysis from a cross-sectional survey and in-depth interviews |
topic | Obstetrics and Gynaecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36410837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061505 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sheenkayleigh whicheventsareexperiencedastraumaticbyobstetriciansandgynaecologistsandwhyaqualitativeanalysisfromacrosssectionalsurveyandindepthinterviews AT goodfellowlaura whicheventsareexperiencedastraumaticbyobstetriciansandgynaecologistsandwhyaqualitativeanalysisfromacrosssectionalsurveyandindepthinterviews AT ballingkatie whicheventsareexperiencedastraumaticbyobstetriciansandgynaecologistsandwhyaqualitativeanalysisfromacrosssectionalsurveyandindepthinterviews AT rymerjanice whicheventsareexperiencedastraumaticbyobstetriciansandgynaecologistsandwhyaqualitativeanalysisfromacrosssectionalsurveyandindepthinterviews AT weeksandrew whicheventsareexperiencedastraumaticbyobstetriciansandgynaecologistsandwhyaqualitativeanalysisfromacrosssectionalsurveyandindepthinterviews AT spibyhelen whicheventsareexperiencedastraumaticbyobstetriciansandgynaecologistsandwhyaqualitativeanalysisfromacrosssectionalsurveyandindepthinterviews AT sladepauline whicheventsareexperiencedastraumaticbyobstetriciansandgynaecologistsandwhyaqualitativeanalysisfromacrosssectionalsurveyandindepthinterviews |