Cargando…
Scoping review protocol of the use of codesign methods in stroke intervention development
INTRODUCTION: Codesign is an emerging research method to enhance intervention development by actively engaging non-researchers (eg, people who have had a stroke, caregivers and clinicians) in research. The involvement of non-researchers in research is becoming increasingly popular within health stud...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36410803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065150 |
_version_ | 1784834356843380736 |
---|---|
author | Singh, Hardeep Nelson, Michelle LA Martyniuk, Julia Colquhoun, Heather Munce, Sarah Cameron, Jill I Kokorelias, Kristina Marie Pakkal, Oya Kuluski, Kerry |
author_facet | Singh, Hardeep Nelson, Michelle LA Martyniuk, Julia Colquhoun, Heather Munce, Sarah Cameron, Jill I Kokorelias, Kristina Marie Pakkal, Oya Kuluski, Kerry |
author_sort | Singh, Hardeep |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Codesign is an emerging research method to enhance intervention development by actively engaging non-researchers (eg, people who have had a stroke, caregivers and clinicians) in research. The involvement of non-researchers in research is becoming increasingly popular within health studies as it may produce more relevant and effective findings. The stroke population commonly exhibits challenges such as aphasia and cognitive changes that may limit their participation in codesign. However, the use of codesign within the stroke literature has not been comprehensively reviewed. This scoping review will determine: (1) what is the extent, range and nature of stroke research that has used codesign methods? (2) What codesign methods have been used to develop stroke interventions? (3) What considerations for codesigning interventions with people who have stroke are not captured in the findings? METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a protocol for a scoping review to identify the literature relating to stroke, and codesign will be conducted on OVID Medline, OVID Embase, OVID PsychINFO, EBSCO CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, PEDro-Physiotherapy Evidence Database and Global Index Medicus. Studies of any design and publication date will be included. Title and abstract and full-text review will be conducted independently by two reviewers. Data will be extracted, collated and then summarised descriptively using quantitative (eg, numerical descriptions) and qualitative (eg, textual descriptions) methods. Numerical summaries will map the extent (eg, number of studies), range (eg, types of studies) and nature (eg, types of interventions developed) of the literature on this topic. A thematic analysis will provide insights into the codesign methods (eg, activities, non-researchers), including heterogeneity across and within studies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review protocol does not require ethics approval as data has not been collected/analysed. The findings will highlight opportunities and recommendations to inform future codesign research in stroke and other populations who exhibit similar challenges/disabilities, and they will be disseminated via publications, presentations and stakeholder meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERREGISTRATION: Open Science Framework: 10.17605/OSF.IO/NSD2W. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9680189 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96801892022-11-23 Scoping review protocol of the use of codesign methods in stroke intervention development Singh, Hardeep Nelson, Michelle LA Martyniuk, Julia Colquhoun, Heather Munce, Sarah Cameron, Jill I Kokorelias, Kristina Marie Pakkal, Oya Kuluski, Kerry BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: Codesign is an emerging research method to enhance intervention development by actively engaging non-researchers (eg, people who have had a stroke, caregivers and clinicians) in research. The involvement of non-researchers in research is becoming increasingly popular within health studies as it may produce more relevant and effective findings. The stroke population commonly exhibits challenges such as aphasia and cognitive changes that may limit their participation in codesign. However, the use of codesign within the stroke literature has not been comprehensively reviewed. This scoping review will determine: (1) what is the extent, range and nature of stroke research that has used codesign methods? (2) What codesign methods have been used to develop stroke interventions? (3) What considerations for codesigning interventions with people who have stroke are not captured in the findings? METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a protocol for a scoping review to identify the literature relating to stroke, and codesign will be conducted on OVID Medline, OVID Embase, OVID PsychINFO, EBSCO CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, PEDro-Physiotherapy Evidence Database and Global Index Medicus. Studies of any design and publication date will be included. Title and abstract and full-text review will be conducted independently by two reviewers. Data will be extracted, collated and then summarised descriptively using quantitative (eg, numerical descriptions) and qualitative (eg, textual descriptions) methods. Numerical summaries will map the extent (eg, number of studies), range (eg, types of studies) and nature (eg, types of interventions developed) of the literature on this topic. A thematic analysis will provide insights into the codesign methods (eg, activities, non-researchers), including heterogeneity across and within studies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review protocol does not require ethics approval as data has not been collected/analysed. The findings will highlight opportunities and recommendations to inform future codesign research in stroke and other populations who exhibit similar challenges/disabilities, and they will be disseminated via publications, presentations and stakeholder meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERREGISTRATION: Open Science Framework: 10.17605/OSF.IO/NSD2W. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9680189/ /pubmed/36410803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065150 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Singh, Hardeep Nelson, Michelle LA Martyniuk, Julia Colquhoun, Heather Munce, Sarah Cameron, Jill I Kokorelias, Kristina Marie Pakkal, Oya Kuluski, Kerry Scoping review protocol of the use of codesign methods in stroke intervention development |
title | Scoping review protocol of the use of codesign methods in stroke intervention development |
title_full | Scoping review protocol of the use of codesign methods in stroke intervention development |
title_fullStr | Scoping review protocol of the use of codesign methods in stroke intervention development |
title_full_unstemmed | Scoping review protocol of the use of codesign methods in stroke intervention development |
title_short | Scoping review protocol of the use of codesign methods in stroke intervention development |
title_sort | scoping review protocol of the use of codesign methods in stroke intervention development |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36410803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065150 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singhhardeep scopingreviewprotocoloftheuseofcodesignmethodsinstrokeinterventiondevelopment AT nelsonmichellela scopingreviewprotocoloftheuseofcodesignmethodsinstrokeinterventiondevelopment AT martyniukjulia scopingreviewprotocoloftheuseofcodesignmethodsinstrokeinterventiondevelopment AT colquhounheather scopingreviewprotocoloftheuseofcodesignmethodsinstrokeinterventiondevelopment AT muncesarah scopingreviewprotocoloftheuseofcodesignmethodsinstrokeinterventiondevelopment AT cameronjilli scopingreviewprotocoloftheuseofcodesignmethodsinstrokeinterventiondevelopment AT kokoreliaskristinamarie scopingreviewprotocoloftheuseofcodesignmethodsinstrokeinterventiondevelopment AT pakkaloya scopingreviewprotocoloftheuseofcodesignmethodsinstrokeinterventiondevelopment AT kuluskikerry scopingreviewprotocoloftheuseofcodesignmethodsinstrokeinterventiondevelopment |