Cargando…

[(18)F]fluciclovine vs. [(18)F]fluorocholine Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: A Head-to-Head Comparison for Early Detection of Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients

Nowadays, there is still no consensus on the most accurate PET radiopharmaceutical to early detect prostate cancer (PCa) relapse. A tailored radiotracer choice based on a specific patient’s profile could ensure prompt disease detection and an improvement in patients management. We aimed to compare t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferrari, Cristina, Mammucci, Paolo, Lavelli, Valentina, Pisani, Antonio Rosario, Nappi, Anna Giulia, Rubini, Dino, Sardaro, Angela, Rubini, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36412685
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8060226
_version_ 1784834376710750208
author Ferrari, Cristina
Mammucci, Paolo
Lavelli, Valentina
Pisani, Antonio Rosario
Nappi, Anna Giulia
Rubini, Dino
Sardaro, Angela
Rubini, Giuseppe
author_facet Ferrari, Cristina
Mammucci, Paolo
Lavelli, Valentina
Pisani, Antonio Rosario
Nappi, Anna Giulia
Rubini, Dino
Sardaro, Angela
Rubini, Giuseppe
author_sort Ferrari, Cristina
collection PubMed
description Nowadays, there is still no consensus on the most accurate PET radiopharmaceutical to early detect prostate cancer (PCa) relapse. A tailored radiotracer choice based on a specific patient’s profile could ensure prompt disease detection and an improvement in patients management. We aimed to compare the [(18)F]fluciclovine and [(18)F]fluorocholine PET/CT detection rate (DR) in PCa patients restaged for early biochemical recurrence (BCR), according to clinical and biochemical features. A cohort of 138 PCa patients with early BCR (mean age: 71 y, range: 50–87 y) were homogeneously randomized 1:1 to a [(18)F]fluciclovine or a [(18)F]fluorocholine PET/CT group. The respective PET/CT DR, according to per-patient and per-region analysis, and the impact of the biochemical, clinical, and histological parameters, were compared. The PSA cut-off values predictive of a positive scan were also calculated. Overall, the [(18)F]fluciclovine PET/CT DR was 64%, significantly higher than the [(18)F]fluorocholine PET/CT DR of 35% (p = 0.001). Similarly, in the per-region analysis, the [(18)F]fluciclovine PET/CT DR was 51% in the prostate region, significantly higher compared to 15% of [(18)F]fluorocholine (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, a statistically significant higher DR in per-patient and per-region (prostate/prostate bed) analysis was observed in the [(18)F]fluciclovine group for 0.5–1 ng/mL (p = 0.018, p = 0.049) and >1 ng/mL (p = 0.040, p < 0.0001) PSA values. A PSA of 0.45 ng/mL for [(18)F]fluciclovine and of 0.94 ng/mL for [(18)F]fluorocholine was identified as the optimal cut-off value in predicting a positive PET/CT scan. Our results demonstrated a better [(18)F]fluciclovine PET/CT DR compared to [(18)F]fluorocholine for restaging PCa patients in early BCR, particularly in the detection of locoregional recurrence. The significantly higher [(18)F]fluciclovine DR for low PSA values (PSA < 1 ng/mL) supports its use in this setting of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9680271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96802712022-11-23 [(18)F]fluciclovine vs. [(18)F]fluorocholine Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: A Head-to-Head Comparison for Early Detection of Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients Ferrari, Cristina Mammucci, Paolo Lavelli, Valentina Pisani, Antonio Rosario Nappi, Anna Giulia Rubini, Dino Sardaro, Angela Rubini, Giuseppe Tomography Article Nowadays, there is still no consensus on the most accurate PET radiopharmaceutical to early detect prostate cancer (PCa) relapse. A tailored radiotracer choice based on a specific patient’s profile could ensure prompt disease detection and an improvement in patients management. We aimed to compare the [(18)F]fluciclovine and [(18)F]fluorocholine PET/CT detection rate (DR) in PCa patients restaged for early biochemical recurrence (BCR), according to clinical and biochemical features. A cohort of 138 PCa patients with early BCR (mean age: 71 y, range: 50–87 y) were homogeneously randomized 1:1 to a [(18)F]fluciclovine or a [(18)F]fluorocholine PET/CT group. The respective PET/CT DR, according to per-patient and per-region analysis, and the impact of the biochemical, clinical, and histological parameters, were compared. The PSA cut-off values predictive of a positive scan were also calculated. Overall, the [(18)F]fluciclovine PET/CT DR was 64%, significantly higher than the [(18)F]fluorocholine PET/CT DR of 35% (p = 0.001). Similarly, in the per-region analysis, the [(18)F]fluciclovine PET/CT DR was 51% in the prostate region, significantly higher compared to 15% of [(18)F]fluorocholine (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, a statistically significant higher DR in per-patient and per-region (prostate/prostate bed) analysis was observed in the [(18)F]fluciclovine group for 0.5–1 ng/mL (p = 0.018, p = 0.049) and >1 ng/mL (p = 0.040, p < 0.0001) PSA values. A PSA of 0.45 ng/mL for [(18)F]fluciclovine and of 0.94 ng/mL for [(18)F]fluorocholine was identified as the optimal cut-off value in predicting a positive PET/CT scan. Our results demonstrated a better [(18)F]fluciclovine PET/CT DR compared to [(18)F]fluorocholine for restaging PCa patients in early BCR, particularly in the detection of locoregional recurrence. The significantly higher [(18)F]fluciclovine DR for low PSA values (PSA < 1 ng/mL) supports its use in this setting of patients. MDPI 2022-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9680271/ /pubmed/36412685 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8060226 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ferrari, Cristina
Mammucci, Paolo
Lavelli, Valentina
Pisani, Antonio Rosario
Nappi, Anna Giulia
Rubini, Dino
Sardaro, Angela
Rubini, Giuseppe
[(18)F]fluciclovine vs. [(18)F]fluorocholine Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: A Head-to-Head Comparison for Early Detection of Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients
title [(18)F]fluciclovine vs. [(18)F]fluorocholine Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: A Head-to-Head Comparison for Early Detection of Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients
title_full [(18)F]fluciclovine vs. [(18)F]fluorocholine Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: A Head-to-Head Comparison for Early Detection of Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients
title_fullStr [(18)F]fluciclovine vs. [(18)F]fluorocholine Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: A Head-to-Head Comparison for Early Detection of Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients
title_full_unstemmed [(18)F]fluciclovine vs. [(18)F]fluorocholine Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: A Head-to-Head Comparison for Early Detection of Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients
title_short [(18)F]fluciclovine vs. [(18)F]fluorocholine Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: A Head-to-Head Comparison for Early Detection of Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients
title_sort [(18)f]fluciclovine vs. [(18)f]fluorocholine positron emission tomography/computed tomography: a head-to-head comparison for early detection of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36412685
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8060226
work_keys_str_mv AT ferraricristina 18ffluciclovinevs18ffluorocholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyaheadtoheadcomparisonforearlydetectionofbiochemicalrecurrenceinprostatecancerpatients
AT mammuccipaolo 18ffluciclovinevs18ffluorocholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyaheadtoheadcomparisonforearlydetectionofbiochemicalrecurrenceinprostatecancerpatients
AT lavellivalentina 18ffluciclovinevs18ffluorocholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyaheadtoheadcomparisonforearlydetectionofbiochemicalrecurrenceinprostatecancerpatients
AT pisaniantoniorosario 18ffluciclovinevs18ffluorocholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyaheadtoheadcomparisonforearlydetectionofbiochemicalrecurrenceinprostatecancerpatients
AT nappiannagiulia 18ffluciclovinevs18ffluorocholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyaheadtoheadcomparisonforearlydetectionofbiochemicalrecurrenceinprostatecancerpatients
AT rubinidino 18ffluciclovinevs18ffluorocholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyaheadtoheadcomparisonforearlydetectionofbiochemicalrecurrenceinprostatecancerpatients
AT sardaroangela 18ffluciclovinevs18ffluorocholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyaheadtoheadcomparisonforearlydetectionofbiochemicalrecurrenceinprostatecancerpatients
AT rubinigiuseppe 18ffluciclovinevs18ffluorocholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyaheadtoheadcomparisonforearlydetectionofbiochemicalrecurrenceinprostatecancerpatients