Cargando…
[(18)F]fluciclovine vs. [(18)F]fluorocholine Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: A Head-to-Head Comparison for Early Detection of Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients
Nowadays, there is still no consensus on the most accurate PET radiopharmaceutical to early detect prostate cancer (PCa) relapse. A tailored radiotracer choice based on a specific patient’s profile could ensure prompt disease detection and an improvement in patients management. We aimed to compare t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36412685 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8060226 |
_version_ | 1784834376710750208 |
---|---|
author | Ferrari, Cristina Mammucci, Paolo Lavelli, Valentina Pisani, Antonio Rosario Nappi, Anna Giulia Rubini, Dino Sardaro, Angela Rubini, Giuseppe |
author_facet | Ferrari, Cristina Mammucci, Paolo Lavelli, Valentina Pisani, Antonio Rosario Nappi, Anna Giulia Rubini, Dino Sardaro, Angela Rubini, Giuseppe |
author_sort | Ferrari, Cristina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Nowadays, there is still no consensus on the most accurate PET radiopharmaceutical to early detect prostate cancer (PCa) relapse. A tailored radiotracer choice based on a specific patient’s profile could ensure prompt disease detection and an improvement in patients management. We aimed to compare the [(18)F]fluciclovine and [(18)F]fluorocholine PET/CT detection rate (DR) in PCa patients restaged for early biochemical recurrence (BCR), according to clinical and biochemical features. A cohort of 138 PCa patients with early BCR (mean age: 71 y, range: 50–87 y) were homogeneously randomized 1:1 to a [(18)F]fluciclovine or a [(18)F]fluorocholine PET/CT group. The respective PET/CT DR, according to per-patient and per-region analysis, and the impact of the biochemical, clinical, and histological parameters, were compared. The PSA cut-off values predictive of a positive scan were also calculated. Overall, the [(18)F]fluciclovine PET/CT DR was 64%, significantly higher than the [(18)F]fluorocholine PET/CT DR of 35% (p = 0.001). Similarly, in the per-region analysis, the [(18)F]fluciclovine PET/CT DR was 51% in the prostate region, significantly higher compared to 15% of [(18)F]fluorocholine (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, a statistically significant higher DR in per-patient and per-region (prostate/prostate bed) analysis was observed in the [(18)F]fluciclovine group for 0.5–1 ng/mL (p = 0.018, p = 0.049) and >1 ng/mL (p = 0.040, p < 0.0001) PSA values. A PSA of 0.45 ng/mL for [(18)F]fluciclovine and of 0.94 ng/mL for [(18)F]fluorocholine was identified as the optimal cut-off value in predicting a positive PET/CT scan. Our results demonstrated a better [(18)F]fluciclovine PET/CT DR compared to [(18)F]fluorocholine for restaging PCa patients in early BCR, particularly in the detection of locoregional recurrence. The significantly higher [(18)F]fluciclovine DR for low PSA values (PSA < 1 ng/mL) supports its use in this setting of patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9680271 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96802712022-11-23 [(18)F]fluciclovine vs. [(18)F]fluorocholine Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: A Head-to-Head Comparison for Early Detection of Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients Ferrari, Cristina Mammucci, Paolo Lavelli, Valentina Pisani, Antonio Rosario Nappi, Anna Giulia Rubini, Dino Sardaro, Angela Rubini, Giuseppe Tomography Article Nowadays, there is still no consensus on the most accurate PET radiopharmaceutical to early detect prostate cancer (PCa) relapse. A tailored radiotracer choice based on a specific patient’s profile could ensure prompt disease detection and an improvement in patients management. We aimed to compare the [(18)F]fluciclovine and [(18)F]fluorocholine PET/CT detection rate (DR) in PCa patients restaged for early biochemical recurrence (BCR), according to clinical and biochemical features. A cohort of 138 PCa patients with early BCR (mean age: 71 y, range: 50–87 y) were homogeneously randomized 1:1 to a [(18)F]fluciclovine or a [(18)F]fluorocholine PET/CT group. The respective PET/CT DR, according to per-patient and per-region analysis, and the impact of the biochemical, clinical, and histological parameters, were compared. The PSA cut-off values predictive of a positive scan were also calculated. Overall, the [(18)F]fluciclovine PET/CT DR was 64%, significantly higher than the [(18)F]fluorocholine PET/CT DR of 35% (p = 0.001). Similarly, in the per-region analysis, the [(18)F]fluciclovine PET/CT DR was 51% in the prostate region, significantly higher compared to 15% of [(18)F]fluorocholine (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, a statistically significant higher DR in per-patient and per-region (prostate/prostate bed) analysis was observed in the [(18)F]fluciclovine group for 0.5–1 ng/mL (p = 0.018, p = 0.049) and >1 ng/mL (p = 0.040, p < 0.0001) PSA values. A PSA of 0.45 ng/mL for [(18)F]fluciclovine and of 0.94 ng/mL for [(18)F]fluorocholine was identified as the optimal cut-off value in predicting a positive PET/CT scan. Our results demonstrated a better [(18)F]fluciclovine PET/CT DR compared to [(18)F]fluorocholine for restaging PCa patients in early BCR, particularly in the detection of locoregional recurrence. The significantly higher [(18)F]fluciclovine DR for low PSA values (PSA < 1 ng/mL) supports its use in this setting of patients. MDPI 2022-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9680271/ /pubmed/36412685 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8060226 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ferrari, Cristina Mammucci, Paolo Lavelli, Valentina Pisani, Antonio Rosario Nappi, Anna Giulia Rubini, Dino Sardaro, Angela Rubini, Giuseppe [(18)F]fluciclovine vs. [(18)F]fluorocholine Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: A Head-to-Head Comparison for Early Detection of Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients |
title | [(18)F]fluciclovine vs. [(18)F]fluorocholine Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: A Head-to-Head Comparison for Early Detection of Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients |
title_full | [(18)F]fluciclovine vs. [(18)F]fluorocholine Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: A Head-to-Head Comparison for Early Detection of Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients |
title_fullStr | [(18)F]fluciclovine vs. [(18)F]fluorocholine Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: A Head-to-Head Comparison for Early Detection of Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | [(18)F]fluciclovine vs. [(18)F]fluorocholine Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: A Head-to-Head Comparison for Early Detection of Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients |
title_short | [(18)F]fluciclovine vs. [(18)F]fluorocholine Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: A Head-to-Head Comparison for Early Detection of Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients |
title_sort | [(18)f]fluciclovine vs. [(18)f]fluorocholine positron emission tomography/computed tomography: a head-to-head comparison for early detection of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36412685 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8060226 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ferraricristina 18ffluciclovinevs18ffluorocholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyaheadtoheadcomparisonforearlydetectionofbiochemicalrecurrenceinprostatecancerpatients AT mammuccipaolo 18ffluciclovinevs18ffluorocholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyaheadtoheadcomparisonforearlydetectionofbiochemicalrecurrenceinprostatecancerpatients AT lavellivalentina 18ffluciclovinevs18ffluorocholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyaheadtoheadcomparisonforearlydetectionofbiochemicalrecurrenceinprostatecancerpatients AT pisaniantoniorosario 18ffluciclovinevs18ffluorocholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyaheadtoheadcomparisonforearlydetectionofbiochemicalrecurrenceinprostatecancerpatients AT nappiannagiulia 18ffluciclovinevs18ffluorocholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyaheadtoheadcomparisonforearlydetectionofbiochemicalrecurrenceinprostatecancerpatients AT rubinidino 18ffluciclovinevs18ffluorocholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyaheadtoheadcomparisonforearlydetectionofbiochemicalrecurrenceinprostatecancerpatients AT sardaroangela 18ffluciclovinevs18ffluorocholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyaheadtoheadcomparisonforearlydetectionofbiochemicalrecurrenceinprostatecancerpatients AT rubinigiuseppe 18ffluciclovinevs18ffluorocholinepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyaheadtoheadcomparisonforearlydetectionofbiochemicalrecurrenceinprostatecancerpatients |