Cargando…
Optimized Lambda Exonuclease Digestion or Purification Using Streptavidin-Coated Beads: Which One Is Best for Successful DNA Aptamer Selection?
The high failure rate of the in vitro aptamer selection process by SELEX (Systematic Evolution of Ligands by EXponential enrichment) limits the production of these innovative oligonucleotides and, consequently, limits their potential applications. The generation of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) is a c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36412811 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps5060089 |
_version_ | 1784834380187828224 |
---|---|
author | Le Dortz, Lisa Lucie Rouxel, Clotilde Leroy, Quentin Brosseau, Noah Boulouis, Henri-Jean Haddad, Nadia Lagrée, Anne-Claire Deshuillers, Pierre Lucien |
author_facet | Le Dortz, Lisa Lucie Rouxel, Clotilde Leroy, Quentin Brosseau, Noah Boulouis, Henri-Jean Haddad, Nadia Lagrée, Anne-Claire Deshuillers, Pierre Lucien |
author_sort | Le Dortz, Lisa Lucie |
collection | PubMed |
description | The high failure rate of the in vitro aptamer selection process by SELEX (Systematic Evolution of Ligands by EXponential enrichment) limits the production of these innovative oligonucleotides and, consequently, limits their potential applications. The generation of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) is a critical step of SELEX, directly affecting the enrichment and the selection of potential binding sequences. The main goal of this study was to confirm the best method for generating ssDNA by comparing the purification of ssDNA, using streptavidin-coated beads, and lambda exonuclease digestion, and by improving ssDNA recovery through protocol improvements. In addition, three techniques for quantifying the ssDNA generated (Qubit vs. Nanodrop(TM) vs. gel quantification) were compared, and these demonstrated the accuracy of the gel-based quantification method. Lambda exonuclease digestion was found to be more efficient for ssDNA recovery than purification using streptavidin-coated beads, both quantitatively and qualitatively. In conclusion, this work provides a detailed and rigorous protocol for generating ssDNA, improving the chances of a successful aptamer selection process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9680285 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96802852022-11-23 Optimized Lambda Exonuclease Digestion or Purification Using Streptavidin-Coated Beads: Which One Is Best for Successful DNA Aptamer Selection? Le Dortz, Lisa Lucie Rouxel, Clotilde Leroy, Quentin Brosseau, Noah Boulouis, Henri-Jean Haddad, Nadia Lagrée, Anne-Claire Deshuillers, Pierre Lucien Methods Protoc Article The high failure rate of the in vitro aptamer selection process by SELEX (Systematic Evolution of Ligands by EXponential enrichment) limits the production of these innovative oligonucleotides and, consequently, limits their potential applications. The generation of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) is a critical step of SELEX, directly affecting the enrichment and the selection of potential binding sequences. The main goal of this study was to confirm the best method for generating ssDNA by comparing the purification of ssDNA, using streptavidin-coated beads, and lambda exonuclease digestion, and by improving ssDNA recovery through protocol improvements. In addition, three techniques for quantifying the ssDNA generated (Qubit vs. Nanodrop(TM) vs. gel quantification) were compared, and these demonstrated the accuracy of the gel-based quantification method. Lambda exonuclease digestion was found to be more efficient for ssDNA recovery than purification using streptavidin-coated beads, both quantitatively and qualitatively. In conclusion, this work provides a detailed and rigorous protocol for generating ssDNA, improving the chances of a successful aptamer selection process. MDPI 2022-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9680285/ /pubmed/36412811 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps5060089 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Le Dortz, Lisa Lucie Rouxel, Clotilde Leroy, Quentin Brosseau, Noah Boulouis, Henri-Jean Haddad, Nadia Lagrée, Anne-Claire Deshuillers, Pierre Lucien Optimized Lambda Exonuclease Digestion or Purification Using Streptavidin-Coated Beads: Which One Is Best for Successful DNA Aptamer Selection? |
title | Optimized Lambda Exonuclease Digestion or Purification Using Streptavidin-Coated Beads: Which One Is Best for Successful DNA Aptamer Selection? |
title_full | Optimized Lambda Exonuclease Digestion or Purification Using Streptavidin-Coated Beads: Which One Is Best for Successful DNA Aptamer Selection? |
title_fullStr | Optimized Lambda Exonuclease Digestion or Purification Using Streptavidin-Coated Beads: Which One Is Best for Successful DNA Aptamer Selection? |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimized Lambda Exonuclease Digestion or Purification Using Streptavidin-Coated Beads: Which One Is Best for Successful DNA Aptamer Selection? |
title_short | Optimized Lambda Exonuclease Digestion or Purification Using Streptavidin-Coated Beads: Which One Is Best for Successful DNA Aptamer Selection? |
title_sort | optimized lambda exonuclease digestion or purification using streptavidin-coated beads: which one is best for successful dna aptamer selection? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36412811 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps5060089 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ledortzlisalucie optimizedlambdaexonucleasedigestionorpurificationusingstreptavidincoatedbeadswhichoneisbestforsuccessfuldnaaptamerselection AT rouxelclotilde optimizedlambdaexonucleasedigestionorpurificationusingstreptavidincoatedbeadswhichoneisbestforsuccessfuldnaaptamerselection AT leroyquentin optimizedlambdaexonucleasedigestionorpurificationusingstreptavidincoatedbeadswhichoneisbestforsuccessfuldnaaptamerselection AT brosseaunoah optimizedlambdaexonucleasedigestionorpurificationusingstreptavidincoatedbeadswhichoneisbestforsuccessfuldnaaptamerselection AT boulouishenrijean optimizedlambdaexonucleasedigestionorpurificationusingstreptavidincoatedbeadswhichoneisbestforsuccessfuldnaaptamerselection AT haddadnadia optimizedlambdaexonucleasedigestionorpurificationusingstreptavidincoatedbeadswhichoneisbestforsuccessfuldnaaptamerselection AT lagreeanneclaire optimizedlambdaexonucleasedigestionorpurificationusingstreptavidincoatedbeadswhichoneisbestforsuccessfuldnaaptamerselection AT deshuillerspierrelucien optimizedlambdaexonucleasedigestionorpurificationusingstreptavidincoatedbeadswhichoneisbestforsuccessfuldnaaptamerselection |