Cargando…
Usefulness of Midline Catheters versus Peripheral Venous Catheters in an Inpatient Unit: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial
Canalization of vascular accesses is one of the most used techniques in hospitalization units. When talking about peripherally inserted catheters, we can differentiate between peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVC), midline catheters, and long peripheral catheters (LPC). Midline catheters are rarel...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36412798 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nursrep12040079 |
_version_ | 1784834384205971456 |
---|---|
author | Villalba-Nicolau, Marcela Chover-Sierra, Elena Saus-Ortega, Carlos Ballestar-Tarín, Maria Luisa Chover-Sierra, Pilar Martínez-Sabater, Antonio |
author_facet | Villalba-Nicolau, Marcela Chover-Sierra, Elena Saus-Ortega, Carlos Ballestar-Tarín, Maria Luisa Chover-Sierra, Pilar Martínez-Sabater, Antonio |
author_sort | Villalba-Nicolau, Marcela |
collection | PubMed |
description | Canalization of vascular accesses is one of the most used techniques in hospitalization units. When talking about peripherally inserted catheters, we can differentiate between peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVC), midline catheters, and long peripheral catheters (LPC). Midline catheters are rarely used despite being recommended for intravenous therapies lasting more than six days. This research is a pilot study of a longitudinal clinical trial. It aims to compare the complications associated with intravenous therapy between the control group (CG) with a PIVC and the experimental group (EG) with a midline in an Internal Medicine Unit of a Spanish hospital for three months. In this study, 44 subjects participated, 25 in the CG and 19 in the EG. The duration of cannulation was longer in the experimental group (8.13 days vs. 3.22, p < 0.001), and the appearance of phlebitis was more significant in the control group (19 patients in CG and 25 patients in EG). Midlines have presented a longer duration of cannulation and fewer complications than the PIVC. This protocol was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05512117). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9680301 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96803012022-11-23 Usefulness of Midline Catheters versus Peripheral Venous Catheters in an Inpatient Unit: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial Villalba-Nicolau, Marcela Chover-Sierra, Elena Saus-Ortega, Carlos Ballestar-Tarín, Maria Luisa Chover-Sierra, Pilar Martínez-Sabater, Antonio Nurs Rep Article Canalization of vascular accesses is one of the most used techniques in hospitalization units. When talking about peripherally inserted catheters, we can differentiate between peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVC), midline catheters, and long peripheral catheters (LPC). Midline catheters are rarely used despite being recommended for intravenous therapies lasting more than six days. This research is a pilot study of a longitudinal clinical trial. It aims to compare the complications associated with intravenous therapy between the control group (CG) with a PIVC and the experimental group (EG) with a midline in an Internal Medicine Unit of a Spanish hospital for three months. In this study, 44 subjects participated, 25 in the CG and 19 in the EG. The duration of cannulation was longer in the experimental group (8.13 days vs. 3.22, p < 0.001), and the appearance of phlebitis was more significant in the control group (19 patients in CG and 25 patients in EG). Midlines have presented a longer duration of cannulation and fewer complications than the PIVC. This protocol was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05512117). MDPI 2022-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9680301/ /pubmed/36412798 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nursrep12040079 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Villalba-Nicolau, Marcela Chover-Sierra, Elena Saus-Ortega, Carlos Ballestar-Tarín, Maria Luisa Chover-Sierra, Pilar Martínez-Sabater, Antonio Usefulness of Midline Catheters versus Peripheral Venous Catheters in an Inpatient Unit: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial |
title | Usefulness of Midline Catheters versus Peripheral Venous Catheters in an Inpatient Unit: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full | Usefulness of Midline Catheters versus Peripheral Venous Catheters in an Inpatient Unit: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | Usefulness of Midline Catheters versus Peripheral Venous Catheters in an Inpatient Unit: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Usefulness of Midline Catheters versus Peripheral Venous Catheters in an Inpatient Unit: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_short | Usefulness of Midline Catheters versus Peripheral Venous Catheters in an Inpatient Unit: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_sort | usefulness of midline catheters versus peripheral venous catheters in an inpatient unit: a pilot randomized clinical trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36412798 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nursrep12040079 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT villalbanicolaumarcela usefulnessofmidlinecathetersversusperipheralvenouscathetersinaninpatientunitapilotrandomizedclinicaltrial AT choversierraelena usefulnessofmidlinecathetersversusperipheralvenouscathetersinaninpatientunitapilotrandomizedclinicaltrial AT sausortegacarlos usefulnessofmidlinecathetersversusperipheralvenouscathetersinaninpatientunitapilotrandomizedclinicaltrial AT ballestartarinmarialuisa usefulnessofmidlinecathetersversusperipheralvenouscathetersinaninpatientunitapilotrandomizedclinicaltrial AT choversierrapilar usefulnessofmidlinecathetersversusperipheralvenouscathetersinaninpatientunitapilotrandomizedclinicaltrial AT martinezsabaterantonio usefulnessofmidlinecathetersversusperipheralvenouscathetersinaninpatientunitapilotrandomizedclinicaltrial |