Cargando…
FDG-PET/MRI for Nonoperative Management of Rectal Cancer: A Prospective Pilot Study
Nonoperative management (NOM) is increasingly utilized for rectal cancer patients with a clinical complete response (cCR) following total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). The objective of this pilot study was to determine whether FDG-PET/MRI alters clinical response assessments among stage I-III rectal ca...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36412686 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8060227 |
_version_ | 1784834395326119936 |
---|---|
author | Ince, Semra Itani, Malak Henke, Lauren E. Smith, Radhika K. Wise, Paul E. Mutch, Matthew G. Glasgow, Sean C. Silviera, Matthew L. Pedersen, Katrina S. Hunt, Steven R. Kim, Hyun Fraum, Tyler J. |
author_facet | Ince, Semra Itani, Malak Henke, Lauren E. Smith, Radhika K. Wise, Paul E. Mutch, Matthew G. Glasgow, Sean C. Silviera, Matthew L. Pedersen, Katrina S. Hunt, Steven R. Kim, Hyun Fraum, Tyler J. |
author_sort | Ince, Semra |
collection | PubMed |
description | Nonoperative management (NOM) is increasingly utilized for rectal cancer patients with a clinical complete response (cCR) following total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). The objective of this pilot study was to determine whether FDG-PET/MRI alters clinical response assessments among stage I-III rectal cancer patients undergoing TNT followed by NOM, relative to MRI alone. This prospective study included 14 subjects with new rectal cancer diagnoses. Imaging consisted of FDG-PET/MRI for initial staging, post-TNT restaging, and surveillance during NOM. Two independent readers assessed treatment response on MRI followed by FDG-PET/MRI. Inter-reader differences were resolved by consensus review. The reference standard for post-TNT restaging consisted of surgical pathology or clinical follow-up. 7/14 subjects completed post-TNT restaging FDG-PET/MRIs. 5/7 subjects had evidence of residual disease and underwent total mesorectal excision; 2/7 subjects had initial cCR with no evidence of disease after 12 months of NOM. FDG-PET/MRI assessments of cCR status at post-TNT restaging had an accuracy of 100%, compared with 71% for MRI alone, as FDG-PET detected residual tumor in 2 more subjects. Inter-reader agreement for cCR status on FDG-PET/MRI was moderate (kappa, 0.56). FDG-PET provided added value in 82% (9/11) of restaging/surveillance scans. Our preliminary data indicate that FDG-PET/MRI can detect more residual disease after TNT than MRI alone, with the FDG-PET component providing added value in most restaging/surveillance scans. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9680346 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96803462022-11-23 FDG-PET/MRI for Nonoperative Management of Rectal Cancer: A Prospective Pilot Study Ince, Semra Itani, Malak Henke, Lauren E. Smith, Radhika K. Wise, Paul E. Mutch, Matthew G. Glasgow, Sean C. Silviera, Matthew L. Pedersen, Katrina S. Hunt, Steven R. Kim, Hyun Fraum, Tyler J. Tomography Article Nonoperative management (NOM) is increasingly utilized for rectal cancer patients with a clinical complete response (cCR) following total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). The objective of this pilot study was to determine whether FDG-PET/MRI alters clinical response assessments among stage I-III rectal cancer patients undergoing TNT followed by NOM, relative to MRI alone. This prospective study included 14 subjects with new rectal cancer diagnoses. Imaging consisted of FDG-PET/MRI for initial staging, post-TNT restaging, and surveillance during NOM. Two independent readers assessed treatment response on MRI followed by FDG-PET/MRI. Inter-reader differences were resolved by consensus review. The reference standard for post-TNT restaging consisted of surgical pathology or clinical follow-up. 7/14 subjects completed post-TNT restaging FDG-PET/MRIs. 5/7 subjects had evidence of residual disease and underwent total mesorectal excision; 2/7 subjects had initial cCR with no evidence of disease after 12 months of NOM. FDG-PET/MRI assessments of cCR status at post-TNT restaging had an accuracy of 100%, compared with 71% for MRI alone, as FDG-PET detected residual tumor in 2 more subjects. Inter-reader agreement for cCR status on FDG-PET/MRI was moderate (kappa, 0.56). FDG-PET provided added value in 82% (9/11) of restaging/surveillance scans. Our preliminary data indicate that FDG-PET/MRI can detect more residual disease after TNT than MRI alone, with the FDG-PET component providing added value in most restaging/surveillance scans. MDPI 2022-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9680346/ /pubmed/36412686 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8060227 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ince, Semra Itani, Malak Henke, Lauren E. Smith, Radhika K. Wise, Paul E. Mutch, Matthew G. Glasgow, Sean C. Silviera, Matthew L. Pedersen, Katrina S. Hunt, Steven R. Kim, Hyun Fraum, Tyler J. FDG-PET/MRI for Nonoperative Management of Rectal Cancer: A Prospective Pilot Study |
title | FDG-PET/MRI for Nonoperative Management of Rectal Cancer: A Prospective Pilot Study |
title_full | FDG-PET/MRI for Nonoperative Management of Rectal Cancer: A Prospective Pilot Study |
title_fullStr | FDG-PET/MRI for Nonoperative Management of Rectal Cancer: A Prospective Pilot Study |
title_full_unstemmed | FDG-PET/MRI for Nonoperative Management of Rectal Cancer: A Prospective Pilot Study |
title_short | FDG-PET/MRI for Nonoperative Management of Rectal Cancer: A Prospective Pilot Study |
title_sort | fdg-pet/mri for nonoperative management of rectal cancer: a prospective pilot study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36412686 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8060227 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT incesemra fdgpetmrifornonoperativemanagementofrectalcanceraprospectivepilotstudy AT itanimalak fdgpetmrifornonoperativemanagementofrectalcanceraprospectivepilotstudy AT henkelaurene fdgpetmrifornonoperativemanagementofrectalcanceraprospectivepilotstudy AT smithradhikak fdgpetmrifornonoperativemanagementofrectalcanceraprospectivepilotstudy AT wisepaule fdgpetmrifornonoperativemanagementofrectalcanceraprospectivepilotstudy AT mutchmatthewg fdgpetmrifornonoperativemanagementofrectalcanceraprospectivepilotstudy AT glasgowseanc fdgpetmrifornonoperativemanagementofrectalcanceraprospectivepilotstudy AT silvieramatthewl fdgpetmrifornonoperativemanagementofrectalcanceraprospectivepilotstudy AT pedersenkatrinas fdgpetmrifornonoperativemanagementofrectalcanceraprospectivepilotstudy AT huntstevenr fdgpetmrifornonoperativemanagementofrectalcanceraprospectivepilotstudy AT kimhyun fdgpetmrifornonoperativemanagementofrectalcanceraprospectivepilotstudy AT fraumtylerj fdgpetmrifornonoperativemanagementofrectalcanceraprospectivepilotstudy |