Cargando…
Pronounced Declines in Meperidine in the US: Is the End Imminent?
Background: Once a widely used analgesic in the United States (US), meperidine offered an alternative opioid to other opioids as a pain reliever and was widely assumed to be safer with acute pancreatitis. However, within the last two decades meperidine, has gone from a frequently used drug to being...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680368/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36412830 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy10060154 |
_version_ | 1784834400644497408 |
---|---|
author | Harrison, Lavinia R. Arnet, Rhudjerry E. Ramos, Anthony S. Chinga, Poul A. Anthony, Trinidy R. Boyle, John M. McCall, Kenneth L. Nichols, Stephanie D. Piper, Brian J. |
author_facet | Harrison, Lavinia R. Arnet, Rhudjerry E. Ramos, Anthony S. Chinga, Poul A. Anthony, Trinidy R. Boyle, John M. McCall, Kenneth L. Nichols, Stephanie D. Piper, Brian J. |
author_sort | Harrison, Lavinia R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Once a widely used analgesic in the United States (US), meperidine offered an alternative opioid to other opioids as a pain reliever and was widely assumed to be safer with acute pancreatitis. However, within the last two decades meperidine, has gone from a frequently used drug to being used only when patients exhibit atypical reactions to opioids (e.g., morphine and hydromorphone), to being taken off the World Health Organization List of Essential Medications and receiving strong recommendations for overall avoidance. The aim of this study was to identify changes in meperidine distribution in the US, and regional disparities as reported to the Drug Enforcement Administration’s Automation of Reports and Consolidated Orders System (DEA ARCOS) and Medicaid. Methods: Data related to meperidine distribution was obtained through ARCOS (2001–2021) and Medicaid public use files (2016–2021). Heat maps were used to visualize regional disparities in distribution by state. States outside a 95% confidence interval were statistically significant. Results: Meperidine distribution between 2001 and 2021 decreased by 97.4% (R = −0.97, p < 0.0001). There was a 34-fold state-level difference in meperidine distribution between Arkansas (16.8 mg/10 persons) and Connecticut (0.5 mg/10 persons) in 2020. Meperidine distribution in 2020 was elevated in Arkansas, Mississippi, and Alabama. In 2021, meperidine distribution was highest in Arkansas (16.7 mg/10 persons) and lowest in Connecticut (0.8 mg/10 persons). Total prescriptions of meperidine as reported by Medicaid decreased by 73.8% (R = −0.67, p = 0.045) between 2016 and 2021. Conclusion: We observed a decrease in the overall distribution of meperidine in the past two decades, with a similar recent decline in prescribing it to Medicaid enrollees. The shortage of some parenteral formulations is an important contributor to these declines, however, the most likely explanation for this global decline in use is related to an increased recognition of safety concerns related to important drug interactions and a neurotoxic metabolite. This data may reflect plans to phase out the use of this opioid, especially in the many situations where safer and more preferred opioids are available. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9680368 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96803682022-11-23 Pronounced Declines in Meperidine in the US: Is the End Imminent? Harrison, Lavinia R. Arnet, Rhudjerry E. Ramos, Anthony S. Chinga, Poul A. Anthony, Trinidy R. Boyle, John M. McCall, Kenneth L. Nichols, Stephanie D. Piper, Brian J. Pharmacy (Basel) Brief Report Background: Once a widely used analgesic in the United States (US), meperidine offered an alternative opioid to other opioids as a pain reliever and was widely assumed to be safer with acute pancreatitis. However, within the last two decades meperidine, has gone from a frequently used drug to being used only when patients exhibit atypical reactions to opioids (e.g., morphine and hydromorphone), to being taken off the World Health Organization List of Essential Medications and receiving strong recommendations for overall avoidance. The aim of this study was to identify changes in meperidine distribution in the US, and regional disparities as reported to the Drug Enforcement Administration’s Automation of Reports and Consolidated Orders System (DEA ARCOS) and Medicaid. Methods: Data related to meperidine distribution was obtained through ARCOS (2001–2021) and Medicaid public use files (2016–2021). Heat maps were used to visualize regional disparities in distribution by state. States outside a 95% confidence interval were statistically significant. Results: Meperidine distribution between 2001 and 2021 decreased by 97.4% (R = −0.97, p < 0.0001). There was a 34-fold state-level difference in meperidine distribution between Arkansas (16.8 mg/10 persons) and Connecticut (0.5 mg/10 persons) in 2020. Meperidine distribution in 2020 was elevated in Arkansas, Mississippi, and Alabama. In 2021, meperidine distribution was highest in Arkansas (16.7 mg/10 persons) and lowest in Connecticut (0.8 mg/10 persons). Total prescriptions of meperidine as reported by Medicaid decreased by 73.8% (R = −0.67, p = 0.045) between 2016 and 2021. Conclusion: We observed a decrease in the overall distribution of meperidine in the past two decades, with a similar recent decline in prescribing it to Medicaid enrollees. The shortage of some parenteral formulations is an important contributor to these declines, however, the most likely explanation for this global decline in use is related to an increased recognition of safety concerns related to important drug interactions and a neurotoxic metabolite. This data may reflect plans to phase out the use of this opioid, especially in the many situations where safer and more preferred opioids are available. MDPI 2022-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9680368/ /pubmed/36412830 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy10060154 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Harrison, Lavinia R. Arnet, Rhudjerry E. Ramos, Anthony S. Chinga, Poul A. Anthony, Trinidy R. Boyle, John M. McCall, Kenneth L. Nichols, Stephanie D. Piper, Brian J. Pronounced Declines in Meperidine in the US: Is the End Imminent? |
title | Pronounced Declines in Meperidine in the US: Is the End Imminent? |
title_full | Pronounced Declines in Meperidine in the US: Is the End Imminent? |
title_fullStr | Pronounced Declines in Meperidine in the US: Is the End Imminent? |
title_full_unstemmed | Pronounced Declines in Meperidine in the US: Is the End Imminent? |
title_short | Pronounced Declines in Meperidine in the US: Is the End Imminent? |
title_sort | pronounced declines in meperidine in the us: is the end imminent? |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680368/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36412830 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy10060154 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harrisonlaviniar pronounceddeclinesinmeperidineintheusistheendimminent AT arnetrhudjerrye pronounceddeclinesinmeperidineintheusistheendimminent AT ramosanthonys pronounceddeclinesinmeperidineintheusistheendimminent AT chingapoula pronounceddeclinesinmeperidineintheusistheendimminent AT anthonytrinidyr pronounceddeclinesinmeperidineintheusistheendimminent AT boylejohnm pronounceddeclinesinmeperidineintheusistheendimminent AT mccallkennethl pronounceddeclinesinmeperidineintheusistheendimminent AT nicholsstephanied pronounceddeclinesinmeperidineintheusistheendimminent AT piperbrianj pronounceddeclinesinmeperidineintheusistheendimminent |