Cargando…

Postural Evaluation in Young Healthy Adults through a Digital and Reproducible Method

Different tools for the assessment of posture exist, from the simplest and cheap plumb line to complex, expensive, 3D-marker-based systems. The aim of this study is to present digital postural normative data of young adults collected through a mobile app to expand the possibilities of digital postur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trovato, Bruno, Roggio, Federico, Sortino, Martina, Zanghì, Marta, Petrigna, Luca, Giuffrida, Rosario, Musumeci, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36412760
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfmk7040098
_version_ 1784834424342315008
author Trovato, Bruno
Roggio, Federico
Sortino, Martina
Zanghì, Marta
Petrigna, Luca
Giuffrida, Rosario
Musumeci, Giuseppe
author_facet Trovato, Bruno
Roggio, Federico
Sortino, Martina
Zanghì, Marta
Petrigna, Luca
Giuffrida, Rosario
Musumeci, Giuseppe
author_sort Trovato, Bruno
collection PubMed
description Different tools for the assessment of posture exist, from the simplest and cheap plumb line to complex, expensive, 3D-marker-based systems. The aim of this study is to present digital postural normative data of young adults collected through a mobile app to expand the possibilities of digital postural evaluation. A sample of 100 healthy volunteers, 50 males and 50 females, was analyzed with the mobile app Apecs-AI Posture Evaluation and Correction System(®) (Apecs). The Student’s t-test evaluated differences between gender to highlight if the digital posture evaluation may differ between groups. A significant difference was present in the anterior coronal plane for axillary alignment (p = 0.04), trunk inclination (p = 0.03), and knee alignment (p = 0.01). Head inclination (p = 0.04), tibia shift (p = 0.01), and foot angle (p < 0.001) presented significant differences in the sagittal plane, while there were no significant differences in the posterior coronal plane. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was considered to evaluate reproducibility. Thirteen parameters out of twenty-two provided an ICC > 0.90, three provided an ICC > 0.60, and six variables did not meet the cut-off criteria. The results highlight that digital posture analysis of healthy individuals may present slight differences related to gender. Additionally, the mobile app showed good reproducibility according to ICC. Digital postural assessment with Apecs could represent a quick method for preventing screening in the general population. Therefore, clinicians should consider this app’s worth as an auxiliary posture evaluation tool.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9680464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96804642022-11-23 Postural Evaluation in Young Healthy Adults through a Digital and Reproducible Method Trovato, Bruno Roggio, Federico Sortino, Martina Zanghì, Marta Petrigna, Luca Giuffrida, Rosario Musumeci, Giuseppe J Funct Morphol Kinesiol Article Different tools for the assessment of posture exist, from the simplest and cheap plumb line to complex, expensive, 3D-marker-based systems. The aim of this study is to present digital postural normative data of young adults collected through a mobile app to expand the possibilities of digital postural evaluation. A sample of 100 healthy volunteers, 50 males and 50 females, was analyzed with the mobile app Apecs-AI Posture Evaluation and Correction System(®) (Apecs). The Student’s t-test evaluated differences between gender to highlight if the digital posture evaluation may differ between groups. A significant difference was present in the anterior coronal plane for axillary alignment (p = 0.04), trunk inclination (p = 0.03), and knee alignment (p = 0.01). Head inclination (p = 0.04), tibia shift (p = 0.01), and foot angle (p < 0.001) presented significant differences in the sagittal plane, while there were no significant differences in the posterior coronal plane. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was considered to evaluate reproducibility. Thirteen parameters out of twenty-two provided an ICC > 0.90, three provided an ICC > 0.60, and six variables did not meet the cut-off criteria. The results highlight that digital posture analysis of healthy individuals may present slight differences related to gender. Additionally, the mobile app showed good reproducibility according to ICC. Digital postural assessment with Apecs could represent a quick method for preventing screening in the general population. Therefore, clinicians should consider this app’s worth as an auxiliary posture evaluation tool. MDPI 2022-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9680464/ /pubmed/36412760 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfmk7040098 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Trovato, Bruno
Roggio, Federico
Sortino, Martina
Zanghì, Marta
Petrigna, Luca
Giuffrida, Rosario
Musumeci, Giuseppe
Postural Evaluation in Young Healthy Adults through a Digital and Reproducible Method
title Postural Evaluation in Young Healthy Adults through a Digital and Reproducible Method
title_full Postural Evaluation in Young Healthy Adults through a Digital and Reproducible Method
title_fullStr Postural Evaluation in Young Healthy Adults through a Digital and Reproducible Method
title_full_unstemmed Postural Evaluation in Young Healthy Adults through a Digital and Reproducible Method
title_short Postural Evaluation in Young Healthy Adults through a Digital and Reproducible Method
title_sort postural evaluation in young healthy adults through a digital and reproducible method
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36412760
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfmk7040098
work_keys_str_mv AT trovatobruno posturalevaluationinyounghealthyadultsthroughadigitalandreproduciblemethod
AT roggiofederico posturalevaluationinyounghealthyadultsthroughadigitalandreproduciblemethod
AT sortinomartina posturalevaluationinyounghealthyadultsthroughadigitalandreproduciblemethod
AT zanghimarta posturalevaluationinyounghealthyadultsthroughadigitalandreproduciblemethod
AT petrignaluca posturalevaluationinyounghealthyadultsthroughadigitalandreproduciblemethod
AT giuffridarosario posturalevaluationinyounghealthyadultsthroughadigitalandreproduciblemethod
AT musumecigiuseppe posturalevaluationinyounghealthyadultsthroughadigitalandreproduciblemethod