Cargando…

Results from the AAPM Task Group 324 respiratory motion management in radiation oncology survey

PURPOSE: To quantify the clinical practice of respiratory motion management in radiation oncology. METHODS: A respiratory motion management survey was designed and conducted based on clinician survey guidelines. The survey was administered to American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) mem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ball, Helen J., Santanam, Lakshmi, Senan, Suresh, Tanyi, James A., van Herk, Marcel, Keall, Paul J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36316761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13810
_version_ 1784834451407110144
author Ball, Helen J.
Santanam, Lakshmi
Senan, Suresh
Tanyi, James A.
van Herk, Marcel
Keall, Paul J.
author_facet Ball, Helen J.
Santanam, Lakshmi
Senan, Suresh
Tanyi, James A.
van Herk, Marcel
Keall, Paul J.
author_sort Ball, Helen J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To quantify the clinical practice of respiratory motion management in radiation oncology. METHODS: A respiratory motion management survey was designed and conducted based on clinician survey guidelines. The survey was administered to American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) members on 17 August 2020 and closed on 13 September 2020. RESULTS: A total of 527 respondents completed the entire survey and 651 respondents completed part of the survey, with the partially completed surveys included in the analysis. Overall, 84% of survey respondents used deep inspiration breath hold for left‐sided breast cancer. Overall, 83% of respondents perceived respiratory motion management for thoracic and abdominal cancer radiotherapy patients to be either very important or required. Overall, 95% of respondents used respiratory motion management for thoracic and abdominal sites, with 36% of respondents using respiratory motion management for at least 90% of thoracic and abdominal patients. The majority (60%) of respondents used the internal target volume method to treat thoracic and abdominal cancer patients, with 25% using breath hold or abdominal compression and 13% using gating or tracking. CONCLUSIONS: A respiratory motion management survey has been completed by AAPM members. Respiratory motion management is generally considered very important or required and is widely used for breast, thoracic, and abdominal cancer treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9680579
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96805792022-11-23 Results from the AAPM Task Group 324 respiratory motion management in radiation oncology survey Ball, Helen J. Santanam, Lakshmi Senan, Suresh Tanyi, James A. van Herk, Marcel Keall, Paul J. J Appl Clin Med Phys AAPM Reports & Documents PURPOSE: To quantify the clinical practice of respiratory motion management in radiation oncology. METHODS: A respiratory motion management survey was designed and conducted based on clinician survey guidelines. The survey was administered to American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) members on 17 August 2020 and closed on 13 September 2020. RESULTS: A total of 527 respondents completed the entire survey and 651 respondents completed part of the survey, with the partially completed surveys included in the analysis. Overall, 84% of survey respondents used deep inspiration breath hold for left‐sided breast cancer. Overall, 83% of respondents perceived respiratory motion management for thoracic and abdominal cancer radiotherapy patients to be either very important or required. Overall, 95% of respondents used respiratory motion management for thoracic and abdominal sites, with 36% of respondents using respiratory motion management for at least 90% of thoracic and abdominal patients. The majority (60%) of respondents used the internal target volume method to treat thoracic and abdominal cancer patients, with 25% using breath hold or abdominal compression and 13% using gating or tracking. CONCLUSIONS: A respiratory motion management survey has been completed by AAPM members. Respiratory motion management is generally considered very important or required and is widely used for breast, thoracic, and abdominal cancer treatments. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9680579/ /pubmed/36316761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13810 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle AAPM Reports & Documents
Ball, Helen J.
Santanam, Lakshmi
Senan, Suresh
Tanyi, James A.
van Herk, Marcel
Keall, Paul J.
Results from the AAPM Task Group 324 respiratory motion management in radiation oncology survey
title Results from the AAPM Task Group 324 respiratory motion management in radiation oncology survey
title_full Results from the AAPM Task Group 324 respiratory motion management in radiation oncology survey
title_fullStr Results from the AAPM Task Group 324 respiratory motion management in radiation oncology survey
title_full_unstemmed Results from the AAPM Task Group 324 respiratory motion management in radiation oncology survey
title_short Results from the AAPM Task Group 324 respiratory motion management in radiation oncology survey
title_sort results from the aapm task group 324 respiratory motion management in radiation oncology survey
topic AAPM Reports & Documents
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36316761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13810
work_keys_str_mv AT ballhelenj resultsfromtheaapmtaskgroup324respiratorymotionmanagementinradiationoncologysurvey
AT santanamlakshmi resultsfromtheaapmtaskgroup324respiratorymotionmanagementinradiationoncologysurvey
AT senansuresh resultsfromtheaapmtaskgroup324respiratorymotionmanagementinradiationoncologysurvey
AT tanyijamesa resultsfromtheaapmtaskgroup324respiratorymotionmanagementinradiationoncologysurvey
AT vanherkmarcel resultsfromtheaapmtaskgroup324respiratorymotionmanagementinradiationoncologysurvey
AT keallpaulj resultsfromtheaapmtaskgroup324respiratorymotionmanagementinradiationoncologysurvey