Cargando…
The Veteran Friendly Practice accreditation programme: a mixed-methods evaluation
BACKGROUND: The Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Veteran Friendly Practice Accreditation Programme launched in 2019, aiming to allow practices to better identify, treat, and refer veterans, where appropriate, to dedicated NHS services. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of the accredita...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal College of General Practitioners
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35387764 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0012 |
_version_ | 1784834478739292160 |
---|---|
author | Finnegan, Alan Salem, Kate Ainsworth-Moore, Lottie Randles, Rebecca West, Lauren Simpson, Robin Grant, Veronica Benedicta |
author_facet | Finnegan, Alan Salem, Kate Ainsworth-Moore, Lottie Randles, Rebecca West, Lauren Simpson, Robin Grant, Veronica Benedicta |
author_sort | Finnegan, Alan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Veteran Friendly Practice Accreditation Programme launched in 2019, aiming to allow practices to better identify, treat, and refer veterans, where appropriate, to dedicated NHS services. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of the accreditation programme, focusing on benefits for the veteran, the practice, and the delivery of the programme itself. DESIGN & SETTING: The study evaluated the views of veteran-friendly accredited GP practices across England. METHOD: A mixed-methods study was undertaken, which collected data via an online survey from 232 accredited primary healthcare (PHC) staff and 15 semi-structured interviews with PHC veteran leads. Interviews were analysed using modified grounded theory. RESULTS: The study found 99% (n = 228) of responders would recommend the programme, 78% (n = 180) reported improved awareness, and 84% (n = 193) a better understanding of veterans' needs. Seventy-two per cent (n = 166) identified benefits for veterans who were engaging more with PHC but participants felt more time was needed, largely owing to the COVID-19 pandemic, to fully assess the impact of the programme on help-seeking behaviour. Challenges included identifying veterans already registered, promoting the accreditation process, and ensuring all PHC staff were kept up to date with veteran issues. CONCLUSION: The programme has increased signposting to veteran-specific services and resulted in greater understanding of the NHS priority referral criteria for veterans. Recording of veteran status has improved and there was evidence of a better medical record coding system in PHC practices. These findings add to the limited empirical evidence exploring veteran engagement in PHC, and demonstrate how accreditation results in better treatment and identification of veterans. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9680744 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Royal College of General Practitioners |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96807442022-11-23 The Veteran Friendly Practice accreditation programme: a mixed-methods evaluation Finnegan, Alan Salem, Kate Ainsworth-Moore, Lottie Randles, Rebecca West, Lauren Simpson, Robin Grant, Veronica Benedicta BJGP Open Research BACKGROUND: The Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Veteran Friendly Practice Accreditation Programme launched in 2019, aiming to allow practices to better identify, treat, and refer veterans, where appropriate, to dedicated NHS services. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of the accreditation programme, focusing on benefits for the veteran, the practice, and the delivery of the programme itself. DESIGN & SETTING: The study evaluated the views of veteran-friendly accredited GP practices across England. METHOD: A mixed-methods study was undertaken, which collected data via an online survey from 232 accredited primary healthcare (PHC) staff and 15 semi-structured interviews with PHC veteran leads. Interviews were analysed using modified grounded theory. RESULTS: The study found 99% (n = 228) of responders would recommend the programme, 78% (n = 180) reported improved awareness, and 84% (n = 193) a better understanding of veterans' needs. Seventy-two per cent (n = 166) identified benefits for veterans who were engaging more with PHC but participants felt more time was needed, largely owing to the COVID-19 pandemic, to fully assess the impact of the programme on help-seeking behaviour. Challenges included identifying veterans already registered, promoting the accreditation process, and ensuring all PHC staff were kept up to date with veteran issues. CONCLUSION: The programme has increased signposting to veteran-specific services and resulted in greater understanding of the NHS priority referral criteria for veterans. Recording of veteran status has improved and there was evidence of a better medical record coding system in PHC practices. These findings add to the limited empirical evidence exploring veteran engagement in PHC, and demonstrate how accreditation results in better treatment and identification of veterans. Royal College of General Practitioners 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9680744/ /pubmed/35387764 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0012 Text en Copyright © 2022, The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Research Finnegan, Alan Salem, Kate Ainsworth-Moore, Lottie Randles, Rebecca West, Lauren Simpson, Robin Grant, Veronica Benedicta The Veteran Friendly Practice accreditation programme: a mixed-methods evaluation |
title | The Veteran Friendly Practice accreditation programme: a mixed-methods evaluation |
title_full | The Veteran Friendly Practice accreditation programme: a mixed-methods evaluation |
title_fullStr | The Veteran Friendly Practice accreditation programme: a mixed-methods evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | The Veteran Friendly Practice accreditation programme: a mixed-methods evaluation |
title_short | The Veteran Friendly Practice accreditation programme: a mixed-methods evaluation |
title_sort | veteran friendly practice accreditation programme: a mixed-methods evaluation |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35387764 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0012 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT finneganalan theveteranfriendlypracticeaccreditationprogrammeamixedmethodsevaluation AT salemkate theveteranfriendlypracticeaccreditationprogrammeamixedmethodsevaluation AT ainsworthmoorelottie theveteranfriendlypracticeaccreditationprogrammeamixedmethodsevaluation AT randlesrebecca theveteranfriendlypracticeaccreditationprogrammeamixedmethodsevaluation AT westlauren theveteranfriendlypracticeaccreditationprogrammeamixedmethodsevaluation AT simpsonrobin theveteranfriendlypracticeaccreditationprogrammeamixedmethodsevaluation AT grantveronicabenedicta theveteranfriendlypracticeaccreditationprogrammeamixedmethodsevaluation AT finneganalan veteranfriendlypracticeaccreditationprogrammeamixedmethodsevaluation AT salemkate veteranfriendlypracticeaccreditationprogrammeamixedmethodsevaluation AT ainsworthmoorelottie veteranfriendlypracticeaccreditationprogrammeamixedmethodsevaluation AT randlesrebecca veteranfriendlypracticeaccreditationprogrammeamixedmethodsevaluation AT westlauren veteranfriendlypracticeaccreditationprogrammeamixedmethodsevaluation AT simpsonrobin veteranfriendlypracticeaccreditationprogrammeamixedmethodsevaluation AT grantveronicabenedicta veteranfriendlypracticeaccreditationprogrammeamixedmethodsevaluation |