Cargando…

The Veteran Friendly Practice accreditation programme: a mixed-methods evaluation

BACKGROUND: The Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Veteran Friendly Practice Accreditation Programme launched in 2019, aiming to allow practices to better identify, treat, and refer veterans, where appropriate, to dedicated NHS services. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of the accredita...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Finnegan, Alan, Salem, Kate, Ainsworth-Moore, Lottie, Randles, Rebecca, West, Lauren, Simpson, Robin, Grant, Veronica Benedicta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35387764
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0012
_version_ 1784834478739292160
author Finnegan, Alan
Salem, Kate
Ainsworth-Moore, Lottie
Randles, Rebecca
West, Lauren
Simpson, Robin
Grant, Veronica Benedicta
author_facet Finnegan, Alan
Salem, Kate
Ainsworth-Moore, Lottie
Randles, Rebecca
West, Lauren
Simpson, Robin
Grant, Veronica Benedicta
author_sort Finnegan, Alan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Veteran Friendly Practice Accreditation Programme launched in 2019, aiming to allow practices to better identify, treat, and refer veterans, where appropriate, to dedicated NHS services. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of the accreditation programme, focusing on benefits for the veteran, the practice, and the delivery of the programme itself. DESIGN & SETTING: The study evaluated the views of veteran-friendly accredited GP practices across England. METHOD: A mixed-methods study was undertaken, which collected data via an online survey from 232 accredited primary healthcare (PHC) staff and 15 semi-structured interviews with PHC veteran leads. Interviews were analysed using modified grounded theory. RESULTS: The study found 99% (n = 228) of responders would recommend the programme, 78% (n = 180) reported improved awareness, and 84% (n = 193) a better understanding of veterans' needs. Seventy-two per cent (n = 166) identified benefits for veterans who were engaging more with PHC but participants felt more time was needed, largely owing to the COVID-19 pandemic, to fully assess the impact of the programme on help-seeking behaviour. Challenges included identifying veterans already registered, promoting the accreditation process, and ensuring all PHC staff were kept up to date with veteran issues. CONCLUSION: The programme has increased signposting to veteran-specific services and resulted in greater understanding of the NHS priority referral criteria for veterans. Recording of veteran status has improved and there was evidence of a better medical record coding system in PHC practices. These findings add to the limited empirical evidence exploring veteran engagement in PHC, and demonstrate how accreditation results in better treatment and identification of veterans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9680744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96807442022-11-23 The Veteran Friendly Practice accreditation programme: a mixed-methods evaluation Finnegan, Alan Salem, Kate Ainsworth-Moore, Lottie Randles, Rebecca West, Lauren Simpson, Robin Grant, Veronica Benedicta BJGP Open Research BACKGROUND: The Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Veteran Friendly Practice Accreditation Programme launched in 2019, aiming to allow practices to better identify, treat, and refer veterans, where appropriate, to dedicated NHS services. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of the accreditation programme, focusing on benefits for the veteran, the practice, and the delivery of the programme itself. DESIGN & SETTING: The study evaluated the views of veteran-friendly accredited GP practices across England. METHOD: A mixed-methods study was undertaken, which collected data via an online survey from 232 accredited primary healthcare (PHC) staff and 15 semi-structured interviews with PHC veteran leads. Interviews were analysed using modified grounded theory. RESULTS: The study found 99% (n = 228) of responders would recommend the programme, 78% (n = 180) reported improved awareness, and 84% (n = 193) a better understanding of veterans' needs. Seventy-two per cent (n = 166) identified benefits for veterans who were engaging more with PHC but participants felt more time was needed, largely owing to the COVID-19 pandemic, to fully assess the impact of the programme on help-seeking behaviour. Challenges included identifying veterans already registered, promoting the accreditation process, and ensuring all PHC staff were kept up to date with veteran issues. CONCLUSION: The programme has increased signposting to veteran-specific services and resulted in greater understanding of the NHS priority referral criteria for veterans. Recording of veteran status has improved and there was evidence of a better medical record coding system in PHC practices. These findings add to the limited empirical evidence exploring veteran engagement in PHC, and demonstrate how accreditation results in better treatment and identification of veterans. Royal College of General Practitioners 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9680744/ /pubmed/35387764 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0012 Text en Copyright © 2022, The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Research
Finnegan, Alan
Salem, Kate
Ainsworth-Moore, Lottie
Randles, Rebecca
West, Lauren
Simpson, Robin
Grant, Veronica Benedicta
The Veteran Friendly Practice accreditation programme: a mixed-methods evaluation
title The Veteran Friendly Practice accreditation programme: a mixed-methods evaluation
title_full The Veteran Friendly Practice accreditation programme: a mixed-methods evaluation
title_fullStr The Veteran Friendly Practice accreditation programme: a mixed-methods evaluation
title_full_unstemmed The Veteran Friendly Practice accreditation programme: a mixed-methods evaluation
title_short The Veteran Friendly Practice accreditation programme: a mixed-methods evaluation
title_sort veteran friendly practice accreditation programme: a mixed-methods evaluation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35387764
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0012
work_keys_str_mv AT finneganalan theveteranfriendlypracticeaccreditationprogrammeamixedmethodsevaluation
AT salemkate theveteranfriendlypracticeaccreditationprogrammeamixedmethodsevaluation
AT ainsworthmoorelottie theveteranfriendlypracticeaccreditationprogrammeamixedmethodsevaluation
AT randlesrebecca theveteranfriendlypracticeaccreditationprogrammeamixedmethodsevaluation
AT westlauren theveteranfriendlypracticeaccreditationprogrammeamixedmethodsevaluation
AT simpsonrobin theveteranfriendlypracticeaccreditationprogrammeamixedmethodsevaluation
AT grantveronicabenedicta theveteranfriendlypracticeaccreditationprogrammeamixedmethodsevaluation
AT finneganalan veteranfriendlypracticeaccreditationprogrammeamixedmethodsevaluation
AT salemkate veteranfriendlypracticeaccreditationprogrammeamixedmethodsevaluation
AT ainsworthmoorelottie veteranfriendlypracticeaccreditationprogrammeamixedmethodsevaluation
AT randlesrebecca veteranfriendlypracticeaccreditationprogrammeamixedmethodsevaluation
AT westlauren veteranfriendlypracticeaccreditationprogrammeamixedmethodsevaluation
AT simpsonrobin veteranfriendlypracticeaccreditationprogrammeamixedmethodsevaluation
AT grantveronicabenedicta veteranfriendlypracticeaccreditationprogrammeamixedmethodsevaluation