Cargando…

High rates of anorectal chlamydia in women: a cross-sectional study in general practice

BACKGROUND: Genital and anorectal Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) frequently present together in sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics. AIM: To investigate the prevalence of co-occurrent genital and anorectal chlamydia infection, and to study whether sexual behaviour is associated with anorectal i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: AB, Elisabeth, Luijt, Dirk, Ott, Alewijn, Dekker, Janny H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35273005
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0223
_version_ 1784834483960152064
author AB, Elisabeth
Luijt, Dirk
Ott, Alewijn
Dekker, Janny H
author_facet AB, Elisabeth
Luijt, Dirk
Ott, Alewijn
Dekker, Janny H
author_sort AB, Elisabeth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Genital and anorectal Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) frequently present together in sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics. AIM: To investigate the prevalence of co-occurrent genital and anorectal chlamydia infection, and to study whether sexual behaviour is associated with anorectal infection. DESIGN & SETTING: A cross-sectional study in general practices in the north of the Netherlands. METHOD: Women attending general practice with an indication for genital chlamydia testing were included and asked to complete a structured questionnaire on sexual behaviour. Anorectal infection prevalence was compared according to testing indications: standard versus experimental (based on questionnaire answers). Variables associated with anorectal chlamydia were analysed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Data could be analysed for 497 of 515 women included. Overall, 17.8% (n = 87/490) were positive for CT; of these, 72.4% (n = 63/87) had co-occurrent genital and anorectal infection, 13.8% (n = 12/87) had genital infection only, and 12.6% (n = 11/87) had anorectal infection only. Rectal infection was missed in 69.3% of cases using the standard indication alone, while adding the sexual history still missed 20.0%. Age was the only variable significantly associated with anorectal infection. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of anorectal disease is high among women who visit their GP with an indication for genital CT testing. Many anorectal infections are missed despite taking comprehensive sexual histories, meaning that standard treatment of genital infection with azithromycin may result in rectal persistence. Performing anorectal testing in all women with an indication for genital CT testing is, therefore, recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9680765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96807652022-11-23 High rates of anorectal chlamydia in women: a cross-sectional study in general practice AB, Elisabeth Luijt, Dirk Ott, Alewijn Dekker, Janny H BJGP Open Research BACKGROUND: Genital and anorectal Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) frequently present together in sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics. AIM: To investigate the prevalence of co-occurrent genital and anorectal chlamydia infection, and to study whether sexual behaviour is associated with anorectal infection. DESIGN & SETTING: A cross-sectional study in general practices in the north of the Netherlands. METHOD: Women attending general practice with an indication for genital chlamydia testing were included and asked to complete a structured questionnaire on sexual behaviour. Anorectal infection prevalence was compared according to testing indications: standard versus experimental (based on questionnaire answers). Variables associated with anorectal chlamydia were analysed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Data could be analysed for 497 of 515 women included. Overall, 17.8% (n = 87/490) were positive for CT; of these, 72.4% (n = 63/87) had co-occurrent genital and anorectal infection, 13.8% (n = 12/87) had genital infection only, and 12.6% (n = 11/87) had anorectal infection only. Rectal infection was missed in 69.3% of cases using the standard indication alone, while adding the sexual history still missed 20.0%. Age was the only variable significantly associated with anorectal infection. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of anorectal disease is high among women who visit their GP with an indication for genital CT testing. Many anorectal infections are missed despite taking comprehensive sexual histories, meaning that standard treatment of genital infection with azithromycin may result in rectal persistence. Performing anorectal testing in all women with an indication for genital CT testing is, therefore, recommended. Royal College of General Practitioners 2022-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9680765/ /pubmed/35273005 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0223 Text en Copyright © 2022, The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Research
AB, Elisabeth
Luijt, Dirk
Ott, Alewijn
Dekker, Janny H
High rates of anorectal chlamydia in women: a cross-sectional study in general practice
title High rates of anorectal chlamydia in women: a cross-sectional study in general practice
title_full High rates of anorectal chlamydia in women: a cross-sectional study in general practice
title_fullStr High rates of anorectal chlamydia in women: a cross-sectional study in general practice
title_full_unstemmed High rates of anorectal chlamydia in women: a cross-sectional study in general practice
title_short High rates of anorectal chlamydia in women: a cross-sectional study in general practice
title_sort high rates of anorectal chlamydia in women: a cross-sectional study in general practice
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35273005
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0223
work_keys_str_mv AT abelisabeth highratesofanorectalchlamydiainwomenacrosssectionalstudyingeneralpractice
AT luijtdirk highratesofanorectalchlamydiainwomenacrosssectionalstudyingeneralpractice
AT ottalewijn highratesofanorectalchlamydiainwomenacrosssectionalstudyingeneralpractice
AT dekkerjannyh highratesofanorectalchlamydiainwomenacrosssectionalstudyingeneralpractice