Cargando…
High rates of anorectal chlamydia in women: a cross-sectional study in general practice
BACKGROUND: Genital and anorectal Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) frequently present together in sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics. AIM: To investigate the prevalence of co-occurrent genital and anorectal chlamydia infection, and to study whether sexual behaviour is associated with anorectal i...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal College of General Practitioners
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35273005 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0223 |
_version_ | 1784834483960152064 |
---|---|
author | AB, Elisabeth Luijt, Dirk Ott, Alewijn Dekker, Janny H |
author_facet | AB, Elisabeth Luijt, Dirk Ott, Alewijn Dekker, Janny H |
author_sort | AB, Elisabeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Genital and anorectal Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) frequently present together in sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics. AIM: To investigate the prevalence of co-occurrent genital and anorectal chlamydia infection, and to study whether sexual behaviour is associated with anorectal infection. DESIGN & SETTING: A cross-sectional study in general practices in the north of the Netherlands. METHOD: Women attending general practice with an indication for genital chlamydia testing were included and asked to complete a structured questionnaire on sexual behaviour. Anorectal infection prevalence was compared according to testing indications: standard versus experimental (based on questionnaire answers). Variables associated with anorectal chlamydia were analysed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Data could be analysed for 497 of 515 women included. Overall, 17.8% (n = 87/490) were positive for CT; of these, 72.4% (n = 63/87) had co-occurrent genital and anorectal infection, 13.8% (n = 12/87) had genital infection only, and 12.6% (n = 11/87) had anorectal infection only. Rectal infection was missed in 69.3% of cases using the standard indication alone, while adding the sexual history still missed 20.0%. Age was the only variable significantly associated with anorectal infection. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of anorectal disease is high among women who visit their GP with an indication for genital CT testing. Many anorectal infections are missed despite taking comprehensive sexual histories, meaning that standard treatment of genital infection with azithromycin may result in rectal persistence. Performing anorectal testing in all women with an indication for genital CT testing is, therefore, recommended. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9680765 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Royal College of General Practitioners |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96807652022-11-23 High rates of anorectal chlamydia in women: a cross-sectional study in general practice AB, Elisabeth Luijt, Dirk Ott, Alewijn Dekker, Janny H BJGP Open Research BACKGROUND: Genital and anorectal Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) frequently present together in sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics. AIM: To investigate the prevalence of co-occurrent genital and anorectal chlamydia infection, and to study whether sexual behaviour is associated with anorectal infection. DESIGN & SETTING: A cross-sectional study in general practices in the north of the Netherlands. METHOD: Women attending general practice with an indication for genital chlamydia testing were included and asked to complete a structured questionnaire on sexual behaviour. Anorectal infection prevalence was compared according to testing indications: standard versus experimental (based on questionnaire answers). Variables associated with anorectal chlamydia were analysed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Data could be analysed for 497 of 515 women included. Overall, 17.8% (n = 87/490) were positive for CT; of these, 72.4% (n = 63/87) had co-occurrent genital and anorectal infection, 13.8% (n = 12/87) had genital infection only, and 12.6% (n = 11/87) had anorectal infection only. Rectal infection was missed in 69.3% of cases using the standard indication alone, while adding the sexual history still missed 20.0%. Age was the only variable significantly associated with anorectal infection. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of anorectal disease is high among women who visit their GP with an indication for genital CT testing. Many anorectal infections are missed despite taking comprehensive sexual histories, meaning that standard treatment of genital infection with azithromycin may result in rectal persistence. Performing anorectal testing in all women with an indication for genital CT testing is, therefore, recommended. Royal College of General Practitioners 2022-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9680765/ /pubmed/35273005 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0223 Text en Copyright © 2022, The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Research AB, Elisabeth Luijt, Dirk Ott, Alewijn Dekker, Janny H High rates of anorectal chlamydia in women: a cross-sectional study in general practice |
title | High rates of anorectal chlamydia in women: a cross-sectional study in general practice |
title_full | High rates of anorectal chlamydia in women: a cross-sectional study in general practice |
title_fullStr | High rates of anorectal chlamydia in women: a cross-sectional study in general practice |
title_full_unstemmed | High rates of anorectal chlamydia in women: a cross-sectional study in general practice |
title_short | High rates of anorectal chlamydia in women: a cross-sectional study in general practice |
title_sort | high rates of anorectal chlamydia in women: a cross-sectional study in general practice |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9680765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35273005 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0223 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abelisabeth highratesofanorectalchlamydiainwomenacrosssectionalstudyingeneralpractice AT luijtdirk highratesofanorectalchlamydiainwomenacrosssectionalstudyingeneralpractice AT ottalewijn highratesofanorectalchlamydiainwomenacrosssectionalstudyingeneralpractice AT dekkerjannyh highratesofanorectalchlamydiainwomenacrosssectionalstudyingeneralpractice |