Cargando…

Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies

This Formal Comment uses re-analysis after appropriate corrections to claim that the extreme decline effect reported by Clements et al. is a statistical artefact caused by the way they corrected for zeros in percentage data, exacerbated by errors in data compilation, selective data inclusions and mi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Munday, Philip L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9681065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36413526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001809
_version_ 1784834535558479872
author Munday, Philip L.
author_facet Munday, Philip L.
author_sort Munday, Philip L.
collection PubMed
description This Formal Comment uses re-analysis after appropriate corrections to claim that the extreme decline effect reported by Clements et al. is a statistical artefact caused by the way they corrected for zeros in percentage data, exacerbated by errors in data compilation, selective data inclusions and missing studies with strong effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9681065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96810652022-11-23 Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies Munday, Philip L. PLoS Biol Formal Comment This Formal Comment uses re-analysis after appropriate corrections to claim that the extreme decline effect reported by Clements et al. is a statistical artefact caused by the way they corrected for zeros in percentage data, exacerbated by errors in data compilation, selective data inclusions and missing studies with strong effects. Public Library of Science 2022-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9681065/ /pubmed/36413526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001809 Text en © 2022 Philip L. Munday https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Formal Comment
Munday, Philip L.
Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies
title Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies
title_full Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies
title_fullStr Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies
title_full_unstemmed Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies
title_short Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies
title_sort reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies
topic Formal Comment
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9681065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36413526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001809
work_keys_str_mv AT mundayphilipl reanalysisshowsthereisnotanextremedeclineeffectinfishoceanacidificationstudies