Cargando…
Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies
This Formal Comment uses re-analysis after appropriate corrections to claim that the extreme decline effect reported by Clements et al. is a statistical artefact caused by the way they corrected for zeros in percentage data, exacerbated by errors in data compilation, selective data inclusions and mi...
Autor principal: | Munday, Philip L. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9681065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36413526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001809 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Extreme original data yield extreme decline effects
por: Clements, Jeff C., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Reanalysis of the effects of “13 Reasons Why”: Response to Bridge et al.
por: Romer, Daniel
Publicado: (2020) -
Formal Comment: Romer study fails at following core principles of reanalysis
por: Bridge, Jeffrey A., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Selective Data Analysis in Brown et al.'s Continued Critical Reanalysis
por: Fredrickson, Barbara L.
Publicado: (2016) -
More Questions than Answers: Continued Critical Reanalysis of Fredrickson et al.’s Studies of Genomics and Well-Being
por: Brown, Nicholas J. L., et al.
Publicado: (2016)