Cargando…
Exploratory data on the clinical efficacy of monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant of concern
BACKGROUND: Recent in-vitro data have shown that the activity of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) varies according to the variant of concern (VOC). No studies have compared the clinical efficacy of different mAbs against Omicron VOC....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9681201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36413383 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79639 |
_version_ | 1784834567068188672 |
---|---|
author | Mazzaferri, Fulvia Mirandola, Massimo Savoldi, Alessia De Nardo, Pasquale Morra, Matteo Tebon, Maela Armellini, Maddalena De Luca, Giulia Calandrino, Lucrezia Sasset, Lolita D'Elia, Denise Sozio, Emanuela Danese, Elisa Gibellini, Davide Monne, Isabella Scroccaro, Giovanna Magrini, Nicola Cattelan, Annamaria Tascini, Carlo Tacconelli, Evelina |
author_facet | Mazzaferri, Fulvia Mirandola, Massimo Savoldi, Alessia De Nardo, Pasquale Morra, Matteo Tebon, Maela Armellini, Maddalena De Luca, Giulia Calandrino, Lucrezia Sasset, Lolita D'Elia, Denise Sozio, Emanuela Danese, Elisa Gibellini, Davide Monne, Isabella Scroccaro, Giovanna Magrini, Nicola Cattelan, Annamaria Tascini, Carlo Tacconelli, Evelina |
author_sort | Mazzaferri, Fulvia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recent in-vitro data have shown that the activity of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) varies according to the variant of concern (VOC). No studies have compared the clinical efficacy of different mAbs against Omicron VOC. METHODS: The MANTICO trial is a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical efficacy of early treatments with bamlanivimab/etesevimab, casirivimab/imdevimab, and sotrovimab in outpatients aged 50 or older with mild-to-moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection. As the patient enrolment was interrupted for possible futility after the onset of the Omicron wave, the analysis was performed according to the SARS-CoV-2 VOC. The primary outcome was coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) progression (hospitalisation, need of supplemental oxygen therapy, or death through day 14). Secondary outcomes included the time to symptom resolution, assessed using the product-limit method. Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox proportional hazard model were used to assess the association with predictors. Log rank test was used to compare survival functions. RESULTS: Overall, 319 patients were included. Among 141 patients infected with Delta, no COVID-19 progression was recorded, and the time to symptom resolution did not differ significantly between treatment groups (Log-rank Chi-square 0.22, p 0.90). Among 170 patients infected with Omicron (80.6% BA.1 and 19.4% BA.1.1), two COVID-19 progressions were recorded, both in the bamlanivimab/etesevimab group, and the median time to symptom resolution was 5 days shorter in the sotrovimab group compared with the bamlanivimab/etesevimab and casirivimab/imdevimab groups (HR 0.53 and HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.36–0.77 and 95% CI 0.30–0.67, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that, among adult outpatients with mild-to-moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection due to Omicron BA.1 and BA.1.1, early treatment with sotrovimab reduces the time to recovery compared with casirivimab/imdevimab and bamlanivimab/etesevimab. In the same population, early treatment with casirivimab/imdevimab may maintain a role in preventing COVID-19 progression. The generalisability of trial results is substantially limited by the early discontinuation of the trial and firm conclusions cannot be drawn. FUNDING: This trial was funded by the Italian Medicines Agency (Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco, AIFA). The VOC identification was funded by the ORCHESTRA (Connecting European Cohorts to Increase Common and Effective Response to SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic) project, which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 101016167. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT05205759. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9681201 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96812012022-11-23 Exploratory data on the clinical efficacy of monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant of concern Mazzaferri, Fulvia Mirandola, Massimo Savoldi, Alessia De Nardo, Pasquale Morra, Matteo Tebon, Maela Armellini, Maddalena De Luca, Giulia Calandrino, Lucrezia Sasset, Lolita D'Elia, Denise Sozio, Emanuela Danese, Elisa Gibellini, Davide Monne, Isabella Scroccaro, Giovanna Magrini, Nicola Cattelan, Annamaria Tascini, Carlo Tacconelli, Evelina eLife Medicine BACKGROUND: Recent in-vitro data have shown that the activity of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) varies according to the variant of concern (VOC). No studies have compared the clinical efficacy of different mAbs against Omicron VOC. METHODS: The MANTICO trial is a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical efficacy of early treatments with bamlanivimab/etesevimab, casirivimab/imdevimab, and sotrovimab in outpatients aged 50 or older with mild-to-moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection. As the patient enrolment was interrupted for possible futility after the onset of the Omicron wave, the analysis was performed according to the SARS-CoV-2 VOC. The primary outcome was coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) progression (hospitalisation, need of supplemental oxygen therapy, or death through day 14). Secondary outcomes included the time to symptom resolution, assessed using the product-limit method. Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox proportional hazard model were used to assess the association with predictors. Log rank test was used to compare survival functions. RESULTS: Overall, 319 patients were included. Among 141 patients infected with Delta, no COVID-19 progression was recorded, and the time to symptom resolution did not differ significantly between treatment groups (Log-rank Chi-square 0.22, p 0.90). Among 170 patients infected with Omicron (80.6% BA.1 and 19.4% BA.1.1), two COVID-19 progressions were recorded, both in the bamlanivimab/etesevimab group, and the median time to symptom resolution was 5 days shorter in the sotrovimab group compared with the bamlanivimab/etesevimab and casirivimab/imdevimab groups (HR 0.53 and HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.36–0.77 and 95% CI 0.30–0.67, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that, among adult outpatients with mild-to-moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection due to Omicron BA.1 and BA.1.1, early treatment with sotrovimab reduces the time to recovery compared with casirivimab/imdevimab and bamlanivimab/etesevimab. In the same population, early treatment with casirivimab/imdevimab may maintain a role in preventing COVID-19 progression. The generalisability of trial results is substantially limited by the early discontinuation of the trial and firm conclusions cannot be drawn. FUNDING: This trial was funded by the Italian Medicines Agency (Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco, AIFA). The VOC identification was funded by the ORCHESTRA (Connecting European Cohorts to Increase Common and Effective Response to SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic) project, which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 101016167. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT05205759. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2022-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9681201/ /pubmed/36413383 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79639 Text en © 2022, Mazzaferri et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Mazzaferri, Fulvia Mirandola, Massimo Savoldi, Alessia De Nardo, Pasquale Morra, Matteo Tebon, Maela Armellini, Maddalena De Luca, Giulia Calandrino, Lucrezia Sasset, Lolita D'Elia, Denise Sozio, Emanuela Danese, Elisa Gibellini, Davide Monne, Isabella Scroccaro, Giovanna Magrini, Nicola Cattelan, Annamaria Tascini, Carlo Tacconelli, Evelina Exploratory data on the clinical efficacy of monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant of concern |
title | Exploratory data on the clinical efficacy of monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant of concern |
title_full | Exploratory data on the clinical efficacy of monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant of concern |
title_fullStr | Exploratory data on the clinical efficacy of monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant of concern |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploratory data on the clinical efficacy of monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant of concern |
title_short | Exploratory data on the clinical efficacy of monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant of concern |
title_sort | exploratory data on the clinical efficacy of monoclonal antibodies against sars-cov-2 omicron variant of concern |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9681201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36413383 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79639 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mazzaferrifulvia exploratorydataontheclinicalefficacyofmonoclonalantibodiesagainstsarscov2omicronvariantofconcern AT mirandolamassimo exploratorydataontheclinicalefficacyofmonoclonalantibodiesagainstsarscov2omicronvariantofconcern AT savoldialessia exploratorydataontheclinicalefficacyofmonoclonalantibodiesagainstsarscov2omicronvariantofconcern AT denardopasquale exploratorydataontheclinicalefficacyofmonoclonalantibodiesagainstsarscov2omicronvariantofconcern AT morramatteo exploratorydataontheclinicalefficacyofmonoclonalantibodiesagainstsarscov2omicronvariantofconcern AT tebonmaela exploratorydataontheclinicalefficacyofmonoclonalantibodiesagainstsarscov2omicronvariantofconcern AT armellinimaddalena exploratorydataontheclinicalefficacyofmonoclonalantibodiesagainstsarscov2omicronvariantofconcern AT delucagiulia exploratorydataontheclinicalefficacyofmonoclonalantibodiesagainstsarscov2omicronvariantofconcern AT calandrinolucrezia exploratorydataontheclinicalefficacyofmonoclonalantibodiesagainstsarscov2omicronvariantofconcern AT sassetlolita exploratorydataontheclinicalefficacyofmonoclonalantibodiesagainstsarscov2omicronvariantofconcern AT deliadenise exploratorydataontheclinicalefficacyofmonoclonalantibodiesagainstsarscov2omicronvariantofconcern AT sozioemanuela exploratorydataontheclinicalefficacyofmonoclonalantibodiesagainstsarscov2omicronvariantofconcern AT daneseelisa exploratorydataontheclinicalefficacyofmonoclonalantibodiesagainstsarscov2omicronvariantofconcern AT gibellinidavide exploratorydataontheclinicalefficacyofmonoclonalantibodiesagainstsarscov2omicronvariantofconcern AT monneisabella exploratorydataontheclinicalefficacyofmonoclonalantibodiesagainstsarscov2omicronvariantofconcern AT scroccarogiovanna exploratorydataontheclinicalefficacyofmonoclonalantibodiesagainstsarscov2omicronvariantofconcern AT magrininicola exploratorydataontheclinicalefficacyofmonoclonalantibodiesagainstsarscov2omicronvariantofconcern AT cattelanannamaria exploratorydataontheclinicalefficacyofmonoclonalantibodiesagainstsarscov2omicronvariantofconcern AT tascinicarlo exploratorydataontheclinicalefficacyofmonoclonalantibodiesagainstsarscov2omicronvariantofconcern AT exploratorydataontheclinicalefficacyofmonoclonalantibodiesagainstsarscov2omicronvariantofconcern AT tacconellievelina exploratorydataontheclinicalefficacyofmonoclonalantibodiesagainstsarscov2omicronvariantofconcern |