Cargando…

Comparison of Endogenous Endophthalmitis in Patients with and Without COVID-19 Infection

INTRODUCTION: Endogenous endophthalmitis (EE) is an ophthalmic emergency that can have severe sight-threatening complications. Prompt diagnosis and aggressive treatment are central to the successful management of EE. In recent years, a significant increase has occurred in the number of cases of EE....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Namvar, Ehsan, Moallem, Mehdi, Afarid, Mehrdad, Bolkheir, Alireza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9681549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36425881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6284569
_version_ 1784834643635208192
author Namvar, Ehsan
Moallem, Mehdi
Afarid, Mehrdad
Bolkheir, Alireza
author_facet Namvar, Ehsan
Moallem, Mehdi
Afarid, Mehrdad
Bolkheir, Alireza
author_sort Namvar, Ehsan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Endogenous endophthalmitis (EE) is an ophthalmic emergency that can have severe sight-threatening complications. Prompt diagnosis and aggressive treatment are central to the successful management of EE. In recent years, a significant increase has occurred in the number of cases of EE. Some of these individuals had a COVID-19 infection. The current study compared EE in patients with and without COVID-19 infection. METHODS: All cases of EE admitted to Khalili Hospital between April 2020 and September 2021 were included in this prospective case-control study. Patients were divided into 2 groups: (i) the case group (EE patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection; n = 7) and (ii) the control group (EE patients without a history or evidence of COVID-19 infection; n = 7). Age, sex, presenting and final visual acuity, systemic diseases and risk factors for EE, anterior segment and fundus findings, hospitalization due to COVID-19, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, systemic steroid therapy, results of the sepsis workup, causative microorganism, types of treatment (pars plana vitrectomy vs. intravitreal or antifungal antibiotics), and follow-up period were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-four eyes of the 14 patients were included in this study, of which 9 were female. The mean age was 49.57 years. Follow-ups ranged from 1 month to 20 months (mean, 8 months). There were no statistically significant differences in age (P = 0.653), mean follow-up (P = 0.943), gender (P = 0.313), and clinical presentation (P = 0.409) between the case and control groups. Seven patients (50%) had positive intraocular culture results. Two out of 7 patients had a history of COVID-19 infection. The most common causative microorganism was Candida (4 patients [28.57%]; 6 eyes [25%]). No statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in the need for vitrectomy (P = 1.000). The visual outcome between the 2 groups was similar (P = 0.179). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 infection does not seem to affect the severity, visual outcomes, improvement rate, or vitrectomy rate of EE. Early diagnosis and management, especially pars plana vitrectomy, can prevent serious complications and save many eyes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9681549
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96815492022-11-23 Comparison of Endogenous Endophthalmitis in Patients with and Without COVID-19 Infection Namvar, Ehsan Moallem, Mehdi Afarid, Mehrdad Bolkheir, Alireza J Ophthalmol Research Article INTRODUCTION: Endogenous endophthalmitis (EE) is an ophthalmic emergency that can have severe sight-threatening complications. Prompt diagnosis and aggressive treatment are central to the successful management of EE. In recent years, a significant increase has occurred in the number of cases of EE. Some of these individuals had a COVID-19 infection. The current study compared EE in patients with and without COVID-19 infection. METHODS: All cases of EE admitted to Khalili Hospital between April 2020 and September 2021 were included in this prospective case-control study. Patients were divided into 2 groups: (i) the case group (EE patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection; n = 7) and (ii) the control group (EE patients without a history or evidence of COVID-19 infection; n = 7). Age, sex, presenting and final visual acuity, systemic diseases and risk factors for EE, anterior segment and fundus findings, hospitalization due to COVID-19, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, systemic steroid therapy, results of the sepsis workup, causative microorganism, types of treatment (pars plana vitrectomy vs. intravitreal or antifungal antibiotics), and follow-up period were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-four eyes of the 14 patients were included in this study, of which 9 were female. The mean age was 49.57 years. Follow-ups ranged from 1 month to 20 months (mean, 8 months). There were no statistically significant differences in age (P = 0.653), mean follow-up (P = 0.943), gender (P = 0.313), and clinical presentation (P = 0.409) between the case and control groups. Seven patients (50%) had positive intraocular culture results. Two out of 7 patients had a history of COVID-19 infection. The most common causative microorganism was Candida (4 patients [28.57%]; 6 eyes [25%]). No statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in the need for vitrectomy (P = 1.000). The visual outcome between the 2 groups was similar (P = 0.179). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 infection does not seem to affect the severity, visual outcomes, improvement rate, or vitrectomy rate of EE. Early diagnosis and management, especially pars plana vitrectomy, can prevent serious complications and save many eyes. Hindawi 2022-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9681549/ /pubmed/36425881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6284569 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ehsan Namvar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Namvar, Ehsan
Moallem, Mehdi
Afarid, Mehrdad
Bolkheir, Alireza
Comparison of Endogenous Endophthalmitis in Patients with and Without COVID-19 Infection
title Comparison of Endogenous Endophthalmitis in Patients with and Without COVID-19 Infection
title_full Comparison of Endogenous Endophthalmitis in Patients with and Without COVID-19 Infection
title_fullStr Comparison of Endogenous Endophthalmitis in Patients with and Without COVID-19 Infection
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Endogenous Endophthalmitis in Patients with and Without COVID-19 Infection
title_short Comparison of Endogenous Endophthalmitis in Patients with and Without COVID-19 Infection
title_sort comparison of endogenous endophthalmitis in patients with and without covid-19 infection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9681549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36425881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6284569
work_keys_str_mv AT namvarehsan comparisonofendogenousendophthalmitisinpatientswithandwithoutcovid19infection
AT moallemmehdi comparisonofendogenousendophthalmitisinpatientswithandwithoutcovid19infection
AT afaridmehrdad comparisonofendogenousendophthalmitisinpatientswithandwithoutcovid19infection
AT bolkheiralireza comparisonofendogenousendophthalmitisinpatientswithandwithoutcovid19infection