Cargando…
Changes in prenatal testing during the COVID-19 pandemic
OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted healthcare delivery, including prenatal care. The study objective was to assess if timing of routine prenatal testing changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Retrospective observational cohort study using claims data from a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9682111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36440341 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.1064039 |
_version_ | 1784834776108105728 |
---|---|
author | Handley, Sara C. Ledyard, Rachel Lundsberg, Lisbet S. Passarella, Molly Yang, Nancy Son, Moeun McKenney, Kathryn Greenspan, Jay Dysart, Kevin Culhane, Jennifer F. Burris, Heather H. |
author_facet | Handley, Sara C. Ledyard, Rachel Lundsberg, Lisbet S. Passarella, Molly Yang, Nancy Son, Moeun McKenney, Kathryn Greenspan, Jay Dysart, Kevin Culhane, Jennifer F. Burris, Heather H. |
author_sort | Handley, Sara C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted healthcare delivery, including prenatal care. The study objective was to assess if timing of routine prenatal testing changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Retrospective observational cohort study using claims data from a regional insurer (Highmark) and electronic health record data from two academic health systems (Penn Medicine and Yale New Haven) to compare prenatal testing timing in the pre-pandemic (03/10/2018–12/31/2018 and 03/10/2019–12/31/2019) and early COVID-19 pandemic (03/10/2020–12/31/2020) periods. Primary outcomes were second trimester fetal anatomy ultrasounds and gestational diabetes (GDM) testing. A secondary analysis examined first trimester ultrasounds. RESULTS: The three datasets included 31,474 pregnant patients. Mean gestational age for second trimester anatomy ultrasounds increased from the pre-pandemic to COVID-19 period (Highmark 19.4 vs. 19.6 weeks; Penn: 20.1 vs. 20.4 weeks; Yale: 18.8 vs. 19.2 weeks, all p < 0.001). There was a detectable decrease in the proportion of patients who completed the anatomy survey <20 weeks' gestation across datasets, which did not persist at <23 weeks' gestation. There were no consistent changes in timing of GDM screening. There were significant reductions in the proportion of patients with first trimester ultrasounds in the academic institutions (Penn: 57.7% vs. 40.6% and Yale: 78.7% vs. 65.5%, both p < 0.001) but not Highmark. Findings were similar with multivariable adjustment. CONCLUSION: While some prenatal testing happened later in pregnancy during the pandemic, pregnant patients continued to receive appropriately timed testing. Despite disruptions in care delivery, prenatal screening remained a priority for patients and providers during the COVID-19 pandemic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9682111 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96821112022-11-24 Changes in prenatal testing during the COVID-19 pandemic Handley, Sara C. Ledyard, Rachel Lundsberg, Lisbet S. Passarella, Molly Yang, Nancy Son, Moeun McKenney, Kathryn Greenspan, Jay Dysart, Kevin Culhane, Jennifer F. Burris, Heather H. Front Pediatr Pediatrics OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted healthcare delivery, including prenatal care. The study objective was to assess if timing of routine prenatal testing changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Retrospective observational cohort study using claims data from a regional insurer (Highmark) and electronic health record data from two academic health systems (Penn Medicine and Yale New Haven) to compare prenatal testing timing in the pre-pandemic (03/10/2018–12/31/2018 and 03/10/2019–12/31/2019) and early COVID-19 pandemic (03/10/2020–12/31/2020) periods. Primary outcomes were second trimester fetal anatomy ultrasounds and gestational diabetes (GDM) testing. A secondary analysis examined first trimester ultrasounds. RESULTS: The three datasets included 31,474 pregnant patients. Mean gestational age for second trimester anatomy ultrasounds increased from the pre-pandemic to COVID-19 period (Highmark 19.4 vs. 19.6 weeks; Penn: 20.1 vs. 20.4 weeks; Yale: 18.8 vs. 19.2 weeks, all p < 0.001). There was a detectable decrease in the proportion of patients who completed the anatomy survey <20 weeks' gestation across datasets, which did not persist at <23 weeks' gestation. There were no consistent changes in timing of GDM screening. There were significant reductions in the proportion of patients with first trimester ultrasounds in the academic institutions (Penn: 57.7% vs. 40.6% and Yale: 78.7% vs. 65.5%, both p < 0.001) but not Highmark. Findings were similar with multivariable adjustment. CONCLUSION: While some prenatal testing happened later in pregnancy during the pandemic, pregnant patients continued to receive appropriately timed testing. Despite disruptions in care delivery, prenatal screening remained a priority for patients and providers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9682111/ /pubmed/36440341 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.1064039 Text en © 2022 Handley, Ledyard, Lundsberg, Passarella, Yang, Son, Mckenney, Greenspan, Dysart, Culhane and Burris. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pediatrics Handley, Sara C. Ledyard, Rachel Lundsberg, Lisbet S. Passarella, Molly Yang, Nancy Son, Moeun McKenney, Kathryn Greenspan, Jay Dysart, Kevin Culhane, Jennifer F. Burris, Heather H. Changes in prenatal testing during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title | Changes in prenatal testing during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full | Changes in prenatal testing during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_fullStr | Changes in prenatal testing during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | Changes in prenatal testing during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_short | Changes in prenatal testing during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_sort | changes in prenatal testing during the covid-19 pandemic |
topic | Pediatrics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9682111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36440341 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.1064039 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT handleysarac changesinprenataltestingduringthecovid19pandemic AT ledyardrachel changesinprenataltestingduringthecovid19pandemic AT lundsberglisbets changesinprenataltestingduringthecovid19pandemic AT passarellamolly changesinprenataltestingduringthecovid19pandemic AT yangnancy changesinprenataltestingduringthecovid19pandemic AT sonmoeun changesinprenataltestingduringthecovid19pandemic AT mckenneykathryn changesinprenataltestingduringthecovid19pandemic AT greenspanjay changesinprenataltestingduringthecovid19pandemic AT dysartkevin changesinprenataltestingduringthecovid19pandemic AT culhanejenniferf changesinprenataltestingduringthecovid19pandemic AT burrisheatherh changesinprenataltestingduringthecovid19pandemic |