Cargando…

Changes in prenatal testing during the COVID-19 pandemic

OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted healthcare delivery, including prenatal care. The study objective was to assess if timing of routine prenatal testing changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Retrospective observational cohort study using claims data from a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Handley, Sara C., Ledyard, Rachel, Lundsberg, Lisbet S., Passarella, Molly, Yang, Nancy, Son, Moeun, McKenney, Kathryn, Greenspan, Jay, Dysart, Kevin, Culhane, Jennifer F., Burris, Heather H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9682111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36440341
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.1064039
_version_ 1784834776108105728
author Handley, Sara C.
Ledyard, Rachel
Lundsberg, Lisbet S.
Passarella, Molly
Yang, Nancy
Son, Moeun
McKenney, Kathryn
Greenspan, Jay
Dysart, Kevin
Culhane, Jennifer F.
Burris, Heather H.
author_facet Handley, Sara C.
Ledyard, Rachel
Lundsberg, Lisbet S.
Passarella, Molly
Yang, Nancy
Son, Moeun
McKenney, Kathryn
Greenspan, Jay
Dysart, Kevin
Culhane, Jennifer F.
Burris, Heather H.
author_sort Handley, Sara C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted healthcare delivery, including prenatal care. The study objective was to assess if timing of routine prenatal testing changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Retrospective observational cohort study using claims data from a regional insurer (Highmark) and electronic health record data from two academic health systems (Penn Medicine and Yale New Haven) to compare prenatal testing timing in the pre-pandemic (03/10/2018–12/31/2018 and 03/10/2019–12/31/2019) and early COVID-19 pandemic (03/10/2020–12/31/2020) periods. Primary outcomes were second trimester fetal anatomy ultrasounds and gestational diabetes (GDM) testing. A secondary analysis examined first trimester ultrasounds. RESULTS: The three datasets included 31,474 pregnant patients. Mean gestational age for second trimester anatomy ultrasounds increased from the pre-pandemic to COVID-19 period (Highmark 19.4 vs. 19.6 weeks; Penn: 20.1 vs. 20.4 weeks; Yale: 18.8 vs. 19.2 weeks, all p < 0.001). There was a detectable decrease in the proportion of patients who completed the anatomy survey <20 weeks' gestation across datasets, which did not persist at <23 weeks' gestation. There were no consistent changes in timing of GDM screening. There were significant reductions in the proportion of patients with first trimester ultrasounds in the academic institutions (Penn: 57.7% vs. 40.6% and Yale: 78.7% vs. 65.5%, both p < 0.001) but not Highmark. Findings were similar with multivariable adjustment. CONCLUSION: While some prenatal testing happened later in pregnancy during the pandemic, pregnant patients continued to receive appropriately timed testing. Despite disruptions in care delivery, prenatal screening remained a priority for patients and providers during the COVID-19 pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9682111
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96821112022-11-24 Changes in prenatal testing during the COVID-19 pandemic Handley, Sara C. Ledyard, Rachel Lundsberg, Lisbet S. Passarella, Molly Yang, Nancy Son, Moeun McKenney, Kathryn Greenspan, Jay Dysart, Kevin Culhane, Jennifer F. Burris, Heather H. Front Pediatr Pediatrics OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted healthcare delivery, including prenatal care. The study objective was to assess if timing of routine prenatal testing changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Retrospective observational cohort study using claims data from a regional insurer (Highmark) and electronic health record data from two academic health systems (Penn Medicine and Yale New Haven) to compare prenatal testing timing in the pre-pandemic (03/10/2018–12/31/2018 and 03/10/2019–12/31/2019) and early COVID-19 pandemic (03/10/2020–12/31/2020) periods. Primary outcomes were second trimester fetal anatomy ultrasounds and gestational diabetes (GDM) testing. A secondary analysis examined first trimester ultrasounds. RESULTS: The three datasets included 31,474 pregnant patients. Mean gestational age for second trimester anatomy ultrasounds increased from the pre-pandemic to COVID-19 period (Highmark 19.4 vs. 19.6 weeks; Penn: 20.1 vs. 20.4 weeks; Yale: 18.8 vs. 19.2 weeks, all p < 0.001). There was a detectable decrease in the proportion of patients who completed the anatomy survey <20 weeks' gestation across datasets, which did not persist at <23 weeks' gestation. There were no consistent changes in timing of GDM screening. There were significant reductions in the proportion of patients with first trimester ultrasounds in the academic institutions (Penn: 57.7% vs. 40.6% and Yale: 78.7% vs. 65.5%, both p < 0.001) but not Highmark. Findings were similar with multivariable adjustment. CONCLUSION: While some prenatal testing happened later in pregnancy during the pandemic, pregnant patients continued to receive appropriately timed testing. Despite disruptions in care delivery, prenatal screening remained a priority for patients and providers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9682111/ /pubmed/36440341 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.1064039 Text en © 2022 Handley, Ledyard, Lundsberg, Passarella, Yang, Son, Mckenney, Greenspan, Dysart, Culhane and Burris. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Handley, Sara C.
Ledyard, Rachel
Lundsberg, Lisbet S.
Passarella, Molly
Yang, Nancy
Son, Moeun
McKenney, Kathryn
Greenspan, Jay
Dysart, Kevin
Culhane, Jennifer F.
Burris, Heather H.
Changes in prenatal testing during the COVID-19 pandemic
title Changes in prenatal testing during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full Changes in prenatal testing during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_fullStr Changes in prenatal testing during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Changes in prenatal testing during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_short Changes in prenatal testing during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_sort changes in prenatal testing during the covid-19 pandemic
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9682111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36440341
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.1064039
work_keys_str_mv AT handleysarac changesinprenataltestingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT ledyardrachel changesinprenataltestingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT lundsberglisbets changesinprenataltestingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT passarellamolly changesinprenataltestingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT yangnancy changesinprenataltestingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT sonmoeun changesinprenataltestingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT mckenneykathryn changesinprenataltestingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT greenspanjay changesinprenataltestingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT dysartkevin changesinprenataltestingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT culhanejenniferf changesinprenataltestingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT burrisheatherh changesinprenataltestingduringthecovid19pandemic