Cargando…

Aspirin for the prevention of preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

BACKGROUND: The results of randomized controlled studies on aspirin for the prevention of preeclampsia (PE) are conflicting, and some of the related meta-analyses also have limitations or flaws. DATA SOURCES: A search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yixiao, Guo, Xiaojun, Obore, Nathan, Ding, Hongjuan, Wu, Chengqian, Yu, Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9682183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36440041
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.936560
_version_ 1784834793737814016
author Wang, Yixiao
Guo, Xiaojun
Obore, Nathan
Ding, Hongjuan
Wu, Chengqian
Yu, Hong
author_facet Wang, Yixiao
Guo, Xiaojun
Obore, Nathan
Ding, Hongjuan
Wu, Chengqian
Yu, Hong
author_sort Wang, Yixiao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The results of randomized controlled studies on aspirin for the prevention of preeclampsia (PE) are conflicting, and some of the related meta-analyses also have limitations or flaws. DATA SOURCES: A search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, with no time or language restrictions. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomized controlled studies comparing aspirin for the prevention of PE were conducted. METHODS: Systematic reviews were performed according to the Cochrane Manual guidelines. A fixed-effects model or a random-effects model was chosen to calculate pooled relative risks with 95% confidence intervals based on the heterogeneity of the included studies. The study aimed to investigate the effect of aspirin on the development of PE in high-risk and general populations of women. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plots. All included studies were assessed for bias by the Cochrane Manual of Bias Assessment. Subgroup analyses were conducted on the aspirin dose, time of initial aspirin intervention, and the region in which the research was conducted, to explore the effective dose of aspirin and time of initial aspirin intervention and to try to find sources of heterogeneity and publication bias. RESULTS: A total of 39 articles were included, including 29 studies involving pregnant women at high risk for PE (20,133 patients) and 10 studies involving a general population of pregnant women (18,911 patients). Aspirin reduced the incidence of PE by 28% (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.62–0.83) in women at high risk for PE. Aspirin reduced the incidence of PE by 30% in the general population (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52–0.95), but sensitivity analyses found that aspirin in the general population was not robust. A subgroup analysis showed that an aspirin dose of 75 mg/day (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.32–0.78) had a better protective effect than other doses. Starting aspirin at 12–16 weeks (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.53–0.74) of gestation or 17–28 weeks (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44–0.89) reduced the incidence of PE by 38% in women at high risk for PE, but the results were more reliable for use at 12–16 weeks. Heterogeneity and publication bias of the included studies may be mainly due to the studies completed in Asia. CONCLUSION: Aspirin is recommended to be started at 12–16 weeks of pregnancy in women at high risk for PE. The optimal dose of aspirin to use is 75 mg/d. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: [www.ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [CRD42022319984].
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9682183
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96821832022-11-24 Aspirin for the prevention of preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies Wang, Yixiao Guo, Xiaojun Obore, Nathan Ding, Hongjuan Wu, Chengqian Yu, Hong Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: The results of randomized controlled studies on aspirin for the prevention of preeclampsia (PE) are conflicting, and some of the related meta-analyses also have limitations or flaws. DATA SOURCES: A search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, with no time or language restrictions. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomized controlled studies comparing aspirin for the prevention of PE were conducted. METHODS: Systematic reviews were performed according to the Cochrane Manual guidelines. A fixed-effects model or a random-effects model was chosen to calculate pooled relative risks with 95% confidence intervals based on the heterogeneity of the included studies. The study aimed to investigate the effect of aspirin on the development of PE in high-risk and general populations of women. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plots. All included studies were assessed for bias by the Cochrane Manual of Bias Assessment. Subgroup analyses were conducted on the aspirin dose, time of initial aspirin intervention, and the region in which the research was conducted, to explore the effective dose of aspirin and time of initial aspirin intervention and to try to find sources of heterogeneity and publication bias. RESULTS: A total of 39 articles were included, including 29 studies involving pregnant women at high risk for PE (20,133 patients) and 10 studies involving a general population of pregnant women (18,911 patients). Aspirin reduced the incidence of PE by 28% (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.62–0.83) in women at high risk for PE. Aspirin reduced the incidence of PE by 30% in the general population (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52–0.95), but sensitivity analyses found that aspirin in the general population was not robust. A subgroup analysis showed that an aspirin dose of 75 mg/day (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.32–0.78) had a better protective effect than other doses. Starting aspirin at 12–16 weeks (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.53–0.74) of gestation or 17–28 weeks (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44–0.89) reduced the incidence of PE by 38% in women at high risk for PE, but the results were more reliable for use at 12–16 weeks. Heterogeneity and publication bias of the included studies may be mainly due to the studies completed in Asia. CONCLUSION: Aspirin is recommended to be started at 12–16 weeks of pregnancy in women at high risk for PE. The optimal dose of aspirin to use is 75 mg/d. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: [www.ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [CRD42022319984]. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9682183/ /pubmed/36440041 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.936560 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wang, Guo, Obore, Ding, Wu and Yu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Wang, Yixiao
Guo, Xiaojun
Obore, Nathan
Ding, Hongjuan
Wu, Chengqian
Yu, Hong
Aspirin for the prevention of preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
title Aspirin for the prevention of preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
title_full Aspirin for the prevention of preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
title_fullStr Aspirin for the prevention of preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
title_full_unstemmed Aspirin for the prevention of preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
title_short Aspirin for the prevention of preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
title_sort aspirin for the prevention of preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9682183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36440041
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.936560
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyixiao aspirinforthepreventionofpreeclampsiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledstudies
AT guoxiaojun aspirinforthepreventionofpreeclampsiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledstudies
AT oborenathan aspirinforthepreventionofpreeclampsiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledstudies
AT dinghongjuan aspirinforthepreventionofpreeclampsiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledstudies
AT wuchengqian aspirinforthepreventionofpreeclampsiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledstudies
AT yuhong aspirinforthepreventionofpreeclampsiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledstudies