Cargando…

Effects of combination therapy with Shenfu Injection in critically ill patients with septic shock receiving mechanical ventilation: A multicentric, real-world study

Background: Septic shock has increasingly become a cause of death threatening human survival. Shenfu Injection (SFI), a patented Chinese medicine, has been widely used in the treatment of patients with sepsis and cardiovascular diseases domestically. We sought to examine whether combination therapy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Xiaoqian, Huang, Fan, Zhu, Lixia, Luo, Tianyi, Zhang, Yuzhuo, Gu, Huiwen, Guo, Liheng, Mao, Shuai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9682251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36438846
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.1041326
_version_ 1784834809912098816
author Li, Xiaoqian
Huang, Fan
Zhu, Lixia
Luo, Tianyi
Zhang, Yuzhuo
Gu, Huiwen
Guo, Liheng
Mao, Shuai
author_facet Li, Xiaoqian
Huang, Fan
Zhu, Lixia
Luo, Tianyi
Zhang, Yuzhuo
Gu, Huiwen
Guo, Liheng
Mao, Shuai
author_sort Li, Xiaoqian
collection PubMed
description Background: Septic shock has increasingly become a cause of death threatening human survival. Shenfu Injection (SFI), a patented Chinese medicine, has been widely used in the treatment of patients with sepsis and cardiovascular diseases domestically. We sought to examine whether combination therapy with SFI can improve clinical outcomes in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation (MV). Methods: This real-world, multicenter retrospective trial enrolled consecutive adult patients with sepsis requiring MV from four medical/surgical intensive care units (ICUs) in China between August 2016 and September 2021. Patients were identified from the medical information department database of each center and assigned to either of two groups (SFI or control) on the basis of the initial treatment received. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality, and the durations of vasopressor therapy and MV, the ICU length of stay, and costs were assessed as secondary outcomes. Subsequently, we performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on SFI published before July 2021 to verify our conclusions. Results: 2311 mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock (1128 patients in the SFI group and 1183 in the control group) were analyzed. The survival probability during the first 28 days after admission in the SFI group was greater than that in the control group [p < 0.01 by log-rank test; hazard ratio (HR), 0.56; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.39–0.72]. Patients in the SFI group also experienced a significantly reduced duration of vasopressor therapy [7.28 (95% CI, 6.14–8.42) vs. 12.06 (95% CI, 10.71–13.41) days, p < 0.001], more ventilator-free days [6.49 (95% CI, 5.42–7.55) vs. 10.84 (95% CI, 9.59–12.09) days, p < 0.001], a shorter ICU length of stay [18.48 (95% CI, 17.59–19.38) vs. 23.77 (95% CI, 22.47–25.07) days, p < 0.001], and more time free from organ failure [14.23 (95% CI, 12.94–15.52) vs. 19.07 (95% CI, 16.09–22.05) days, p < 0.001]. No major adverse effects were reported in either group. Conclusion: Among critically ill patients requiring MV, combination therapy with SFI can improve the survival probability without any obvious adverse reactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9682251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96822512022-11-24 Effects of combination therapy with Shenfu Injection in critically ill patients with septic shock receiving mechanical ventilation: A multicentric, real-world study Li, Xiaoqian Huang, Fan Zhu, Lixia Luo, Tianyi Zhang, Yuzhuo Gu, Huiwen Guo, Liheng Mao, Shuai Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: Septic shock has increasingly become a cause of death threatening human survival. Shenfu Injection (SFI), a patented Chinese medicine, has been widely used in the treatment of patients with sepsis and cardiovascular diseases domestically. We sought to examine whether combination therapy with SFI can improve clinical outcomes in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation (MV). Methods: This real-world, multicenter retrospective trial enrolled consecutive adult patients with sepsis requiring MV from four medical/surgical intensive care units (ICUs) in China between August 2016 and September 2021. Patients were identified from the medical information department database of each center and assigned to either of two groups (SFI or control) on the basis of the initial treatment received. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality, and the durations of vasopressor therapy and MV, the ICU length of stay, and costs were assessed as secondary outcomes. Subsequently, we performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on SFI published before July 2021 to verify our conclusions. Results: 2311 mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock (1128 patients in the SFI group and 1183 in the control group) were analyzed. The survival probability during the first 28 days after admission in the SFI group was greater than that in the control group [p < 0.01 by log-rank test; hazard ratio (HR), 0.56; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.39–0.72]. Patients in the SFI group also experienced a significantly reduced duration of vasopressor therapy [7.28 (95% CI, 6.14–8.42) vs. 12.06 (95% CI, 10.71–13.41) days, p < 0.001], more ventilator-free days [6.49 (95% CI, 5.42–7.55) vs. 10.84 (95% CI, 9.59–12.09) days, p < 0.001], a shorter ICU length of stay [18.48 (95% CI, 17.59–19.38) vs. 23.77 (95% CI, 22.47–25.07) days, p < 0.001], and more time free from organ failure [14.23 (95% CI, 12.94–15.52) vs. 19.07 (95% CI, 16.09–22.05) days, p < 0.001]. No major adverse effects were reported in either group. Conclusion: Among critically ill patients requiring MV, combination therapy with SFI can improve the survival probability without any obvious adverse reactions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9682251/ /pubmed/36438846 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.1041326 Text en Copyright © 2022 Li, Huang, Zhu, Luo, Zhang, Gu, Guo and Mao. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Li, Xiaoqian
Huang, Fan
Zhu, Lixia
Luo, Tianyi
Zhang, Yuzhuo
Gu, Huiwen
Guo, Liheng
Mao, Shuai
Effects of combination therapy with Shenfu Injection in critically ill patients with septic shock receiving mechanical ventilation: A multicentric, real-world study
title Effects of combination therapy with Shenfu Injection in critically ill patients with septic shock receiving mechanical ventilation: A multicentric, real-world study
title_full Effects of combination therapy with Shenfu Injection in critically ill patients with septic shock receiving mechanical ventilation: A multicentric, real-world study
title_fullStr Effects of combination therapy with Shenfu Injection in critically ill patients with septic shock receiving mechanical ventilation: A multicentric, real-world study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of combination therapy with Shenfu Injection in critically ill patients with septic shock receiving mechanical ventilation: A multicentric, real-world study
title_short Effects of combination therapy with Shenfu Injection in critically ill patients with septic shock receiving mechanical ventilation: A multicentric, real-world study
title_sort effects of combination therapy with shenfu injection in critically ill patients with septic shock receiving mechanical ventilation: a multicentric, real-world study
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9682251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36438846
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.1041326
work_keys_str_mv AT lixiaoqian effectsofcombinationtherapywithshenfuinjectionincriticallyillpatientswithsepticshockreceivingmechanicalventilationamulticentricrealworldstudy
AT huangfan effectsofcombinationtherapywithshenfuinjectionincriticallyillpatientswithsepticshockreceivingmechanicalventilationamulticentricrealworldstudy
AT zhulixia effectsofcombinationtherapywithshenfuinjectionincriticallyillpatientswithsepticshockreceivingmechanicalventilationamulticentricrealworldstudy
AT luotianyi effectsofcombinationtherapywithshenfuinjectionincriticallyillpatientswithsepticshockreceivingmechanicalventilationamulticentricrealworldstudy
AT zhangyuzhuo effectsofcombinationtherapywithshenfuinjectionincriticallyillpatientswithsepticshockreceivingmechanicalventilationamulticentricrealworldstudy
AT guhuiwen effectsofcombinationtherapywithshenfuinjectionincriticallyillpatientswithsepticshockreceivingmechanicalventilationamulticentricrealworldstudy
AT guoliheng effectsofcombinationtherapywithshenfuinjectionincriticallyillpatientswithsepticshockreceivingmechanicalventilationamulticentricrealworldstudy
AT maoshuai effectsofcombinationtherapywithshenfuinjectionincriticallyillpatientswithsepticshockreceivingmechanicalventilationamulticentricrealworldstudy