Cargando…

Bilateral bi-level erector spinae plane blocks in scoliosis surgery: a retrospective comparative study

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effect of the ultrasound (US) guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on pain scores, opioid requirement, patient satisfaction, and the length of hospital stay with standard analgesia methods following scoliosis surgery. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients (17...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akesen, Selcan, Buğra Güler, Saltuk, Akesen, Burak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, and Turkish Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9682554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36300557
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2022.22019
_version_ 1784834877428858880
author Akesen, Selcan
Buğra Güler, Saltuk
Akesen, Burak
author_facet Akesen, Selcan
Buğra Güler, Saltuk
Akesen, Burak
author_sort Akesen, Selcan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effect of the ultrasound (US) guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on pain scores, opioid requirement, patient satisfaction, and the length of hospital stay with standard analgesia methods following scoliosis surgery. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients (17 females, 10 males; mean age = 15.59 ± 3.24 years) who underwent scoliosis surgery with preoperative bilateral bilevel US-guided ESPB were the sample group, and the remaining 30 patients (20 females, 10 males; mean age = 15.57 ± 2.75 years) without ESPB were the control group. Bilateral bilevel injection ESPB was performed at two levels (T4 and T10). Postoperative pain scores, morphine consumption, patient satisfaction scores, and the number of patients requiring rescue analgesia were recorded. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to score postoperative pain. RESULTS: VAS at rest and when mobile, as well as postoperative cumulative morphine consumption in the first postoperative 24 h, was significantly lower in the ESPB group. Thirteen patients in the control group but no in the ESPB group required rescue analgesics in the postoperative period. Both the time to the requirement of the initial dose of PCA and patient satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the ESPB group (P < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSION: Given the need for improved recovery of the patients, ESPB seems to be an essential analgesic technique that may reduce both opioid consumption and the severity of the pain, thus increasing the satisfaction of the patients and decreasing the length of hospital stay. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Therapeutic Study
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9682554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, and Turkish Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96825542022-11-29 Bilateral bi-level erector spinae plane blocks in scoliosis surgery: a retrospective comparative study Akesen, Selcan Buğra Güler, Saltuk Akesen, Burak Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc Research Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effect of the ultrasound (US) guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on pain scores, opioid requirement, patient satisfaction, and the length of hospital stay with standard analgesia methods following scoliosis surgery. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients (17 females, 10 males; mean age = 15.59 ± 3.24 years) who underwent scoliosis surgery with preoperative bilateral bilevel US-guided ESPB were the sample group, and the remaining 30 patients (20 females, 10 males; mean age = 15.57 ± 2.75 years) without ESPB were the control group. Bilateral bilevel injection ESPB was performed at two levels (T4 and T10). Postoperative pain scores, morphine consumption, patient satisfaction scores, and the number of patients requiring rescue analgesia were recorded. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to score postoperative pain. RESULTS: VAS at rest and when mobile, as well as postoperative cumulative morphine consumption in the first postoperative 24 h, was significantly lower in the ESPB group. Thirteen patients in the control group but no in the ESPB group required rescue analgesics in the postoperative period. Both the time to the requirement of the initial dose of PCA and patient satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the ESPB group (P < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSION: Given the need for improved recovery of the patients, ESPB seems to be an essential analgesic technique that may reduce both opioid consumption and the severity of the pain, thus increasing the satisfaction of the patients and decreasing the length of hospital stay. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Therapeutic Study Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, and Turkish Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2022-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9682554/ /pubmed/36300557 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2022.22019 Text en 2022 authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle Research Article
Akesen, Selcan
Buğra Güler, Saltuk
Akesen, Burak
Bilateral bi-level erector spinae plane blocks in scoliosis surgery: a retrospective comparative study
title Bilateral bi-level erector spinae plane blocks in scoliosis surgery: a retrospective comparative study
title_full Bilateral bi-level erector spinae plane blocks in scoliosis surgery: a retrospective comparative study
title_fullStr Bilateral bi-level erector spinae plane blocks in scoliosis surgery: a retrospective comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Bilateral bi-level erector spinae plane blocks in scoliosis surgery: a retrospective comparative study
title_short Bilateral bi-level erector spinae plane blocks in scoliosis surgery: a retrospective comparative study
title_sort bilateral bi-level erector spinae plane blocks in scoliosis surgery: a retrospective comparative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9682554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36300557
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2022.22019
work_keys_str_mv AT akesenselcan bilateralbilevelerectorspinaeplaneblocksinscoliosissurgeryaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT bugragulersaltuk bilateralbilevelerectorspinaeplaneblocksinscoliosissurgeryaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT akesenburak bilateralbilevelerectorspinaeplaneblocksinscoliosissurgeryaretrospectivecomparativestudy