Cargando…

Is single-stage minimally invasive plate fixation safe in open distal radius fractures with metadiaphyseal involvement?: Retrospective evaluation of 54 patients

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and results of one-stage surgery in Gustilo grade 1 and 2 open distal radius fractures with metadiaphyseal involvement. METHODS: This retrospective study included 54 patients with AO-2R3 and metadiaphyseal involvement according to the AO fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: İnci, Fatih, Yavuz, İbrahim Alper
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, and Turkish Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9682555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36250881
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2022.21340
_version_ 1784834877665837056
author İnci, Fatih
Yavuz, İbrahim Alper
author_facet İnci, Fatih
Yavuz, İbrahim Alper
author_sort İnci, Fatih
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and results of one-stage surgery in Gustilo grade 1 and 2 open distal radius fractures with metadiaphyseal involvement. METHODS: This retrospective study included 54 patients with AO-2R3 and metadiaphyseal involvement according to the AO fracture classification. All fractures were treated with a long volar plate using the minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique. The patients were divided into two groups as open fracture group (25 patients) and closed fracture group (29 patients), and the groups were compared for their union time and complications and functional and radiological results. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of clinical and radiographic results (P > .05 for both). The mean union time was 12.77 (range, 8-20) weeks in the open fracture group and 12.75 (range, 8-18) weeks in the closed fracture group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of union time (P > .05). Moreover, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of major and minor complications. All fractures healed without the need for bone and/or soft tissue grafts. CONCLUSION: As a result of this study, using with long volar plate immediately minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis might be safely used as a single-stage definitive treatment for Gustilo grade 1 and 2 open distal radius fractures with metadiaphyseal involvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Therapeutic Study
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9682555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, and Turkish Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96825552022-11-29 Is single-stage minimally invasive plate fixation safe in open distal radius fractures with metadiaphyseal involvement?: Retrospective evaluation of 54 patients İnci, Fatih Yavuz, İbrahim Alper Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc Research Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and results of one-stage surgery in Gustilo grade 1 and 2 open distal radius fractures with metadiaphyseal involvement. METHODS: This retrospective study included 54 patients with AO-2R3 and metadiaphyseal involvement according to the AO fracture classification. All fractures were treated with a long volar plate using the minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique. The patients were divided into two groups as open fracture group (25 patients) and closed fracture group (29 patients), and the groups were compared for their union time and complications and functional and radiological results. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of clinical and radiographic results (P > .05 for both). The mean union time was 12.77 (range, 8-20) weeks in the open fracture group and 12.75 (range, 8-18) weeks in the closed fracture group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of union time (P > .05). Moreover, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of major and minor complications. All fractures healed without the need for bone and/or soft tissue grafts. CONCLUSION: As a result of this study, using with long volar plate immediately minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis might be safely used as a single-stage definitive treatment for Gustilo grade 1 and 2 open distal radius fractures with metadiaphyseal involvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Therapeutic Study Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, and Turkish Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2022-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9682555/ /pubmed/36250881 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2022.21340 Text en 2022 authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle Research Article
İnci, Fatih
Yavuz, İbrahim Alper
Is single-stage minimally invasive plate fixation safe in open distal radius fractures with metadiaphyseal involvement?: Retrospective evaluation of 54 patients
title Is single-stage minimally invasive plate fixation safe in open distal radius fractures with metadiaphyseal involvement?: Retrospective evaluation of 54 patients
title_full Is single-stage minimally invasive plate fixation safe in open distal radius fractures with metadiaphyseal involvement?: Retrospective evaluation of 54 patients
title_fullStr Is single-stage minimally invasive plate fixation safe in open distal radius fractures with metadiaphyseal involvement?: Retrospective evaluation of 54 patients
title_full_unstemmed Is single-stage minimally invasive plate fixation safe in open distal radius fractures with metadiaphyseal involvement?: Retrospective evaluation of 54 patients
title_short Is single-stage minimally invasive plate fixation safe in open distal radius fractures with metadiaphyseal involvement?: Retrospective evaluation of 54 patients
title_sort is single-stage minimally invasive plate fixation safe in open distal radius fractures with metadiaphyseal involvement?: retrospective evaluation of 54 patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9682555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36250881
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2022.21340
work_keys_str_mv AT incifatih issinglestageminimallyinvasiveplatefixationsafeinopendistalradiusfractureswithmetadiaphysealinvolvementretrospectiveevaluationof54patients
AT yavuzibrahimalper issinglestageminimallyinvasiveplatefixationsafeinopendistalradiusfractureswithmetadiaphysealinvolvementretrospectiveevaluationof54patients