Cargando…
Denoising using deep-learning-based reconstruction for whole-heart coronary MRA with sub-millimeter isotropic resolution at 3 T: a volunteer study
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of denoising deep-learning-based reconstruction (dDLR) to improve image quality and vessel delineation in noncontrast 3-T whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography (WHCMRA) with sub-millimeter isotropic resolution (Sub-mm) compare...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Turkish Society of Radiology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9682594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35997475 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/dir.2022.21291 |
Sumario: | PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of denoising deep-learning-based reconstruction (dDLR) to improve image quality and vessel delineation in noncontrast 3-T whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography (WHCMRA) with sub-millimeter isotropic resolution (Sub-mm) compared with a standard resolution without dDLR (Standard). METHODS: For 10 healthy volunteers, we acquired the WHCMRA with Sub-mm with and without dDLR and Standard to quantify signal- (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and vessel edge signal response (VESR) in all the 3 image types. Two independent readers subjectively graded vessel sharpness and signal homogeneity of 8 coronary segments in each patient. We used Kruskal–Wallis test with Bonferroni correction to compare SNR, CNR, VESR, and the subjective evaluation scores among the 3 image types and weighted kappa test to evaluate inter-reader agreement on the scores. RESULTS: SNR was significantly higher with Sub-mm with dDLR (P < .001) and Standard (P = .005) than with Sub-mm without dDLR and was comparable between Sub-mm with dDLR and Standard (P = .511). CNR was significantly higher with Sub-mm with dDLR (P < .001) and Standard (P = .005) than with Sub-mm without dDLR and was comparable between Sub-mm with dDLR and Standard (P = .560). VESR was significantly greater with Sub-mm with (P = .001) and without dDLR (P = .017) than with Standard and was comparable between Sub-mm with and without dDLR (P = 1.000). In the proximal, middle, distal, and all the coronary segments, the subjective vessel sharpness was significantly better with Sub-mm with dDLR than Sub-mm without dDLR and Standard (P < .001, for all) and was comparable between Sub-mm without dDLR and Standard (P > .05); the subjective signal homogeneity was significantly improved from Sub-mm without dDLR to Standard to Sub-mm with dDLR (P < .001). The inter-reader agreement was excellent (kappa = 0.84). CONCLUSION: Application of dDLR is useful for improving image quality and vessel delineation in the WHCMRA with Sub-mm compared with Standard. |
---|