Cargando…
Online Patient Reviews of Breast Reconstruction: RealSelf Analysis
RealSelf is an online community that hosts an expansive number of online reviews for cosmetic and reconstructive plastic surgery procedures. The purpose of this study is to analyze patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction procedures from RealSelf to determine factors contributing to a positiv...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9682616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36438458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004476 |
_version_ | 1784834888451489792 |
---|---|
author | Pham, Jason T. Kim, Joshua K. Hunt, Stephen E. Willette, Dominique M. Tang, Cathy J. |
author_facet | Pham, Jason T. Kim, Joshua K. Hunt, Stephen E. Willette, Dominique M. Tang, Cathy J. |
author_sort | Pham, Jason T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | RealSelf is an online community that hosts an expansive number of online reviews for cosmetic and reconstructive plastic surgery procedures. The purpose of this study is to analyze patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction procedures from RealSelf to determine factors contributing to a positive or negative patient experience. METHODS: The breast reconstruction category from RealSelf.com was analyzed using a web crawler-based application built from Python and Selenium. Reviews were collected from May 2009 to November 2021. Information including RealSelf’s inherent “worth it” ranking system, review text, the number of submitted photographs, and the number of readers who found the review helpful was captured. The content of the review was then independently reviewed by the authors and was categorized with key factors that determined positive or negative reviews. RESULTS: A total of 3451 breast reconstruction reviews were collected. After the authors analyzed each review, 3225 (94.33%) were identified as positive reviews. The most common factors associated with positive reviews were physician demeanor (n = 2600, 31.7%), aesthetic outcome (n = 1955, 23.8%), or staff (n = 1543, 18.8%), while negative reviews were associated with unfavorable aesthetic outcome (n = 94, 28.9%), physician demeanor (n = 82, 25.2%), or postoperative complications (n = 75, 23.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Although there are surveys that analyze patient satisfaction for breast reconstruction, there has not been a study that analyzed a large online review database. Predominating factors in both positive and negative reviews were physician demeanor and aesthetic outcome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9682616 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96826162022-11-25 Online Patient Reviews of Breast Reconstruction: RealSelf Analysis Pham, Jason T. Kim, Joshua K. Hunt, Stephen E. Willette, Dominique M. Tang, Cathy J. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Breast RealSelf is an online community that hosts an expansive number of online reviews for cosmetic and reconstructive plastic surgery procedures. The purpose of this study is to analyze patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction procedures from RealSelf to determine factors contributing to a positive or negative patient experience. METHODS: The breast reconstruction category from RealSelf.com was analyzed using a web crawler-based application built from Python and Selenium. Reviews were collected from May 2009 to November 2021. Information including RealSelf’s inherent “worth it” ranking system, review text, the number of submitted photographs, and the number of readers who found the review helpful was captured. The content of the review was then independently reviewed by the authors and was categorized with key factors that determined positive or negative reviews. RESULTS: A total of 3451 breast reconstruction reviews were collected. After the authors analyzed each review, 3225 (94.33%) were identified as positive reviews. The most common factors associated with positive reviews were physician demeanor (n = 2600, 31.7%), aesthetic outcome (n = 1955, 23.8%), or staff (n = 1543, 18.8%), while negative reviews were associated with unfavorable aesthetic outcome (n = 94, 28.9%), physician demeanor (n = 82, 25.2%), or postoperative complications (n = 75, 23.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Although there are surveys that analyze patient satisfaction for breast reconstruction, there has not been a study that analyzed a large online review database. Predominating factors in both positive and negative reviews were physician demeanor and aesthetic outcome. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9682616/ /pubmed/36438458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004476 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Breast Pham, Jason T. Kim, Joshua K. Hunt, Stephen E. Willette, Dominique M. Tang, Cathy J. Online Patient Reviews of Breast Reconstruction: RealSelf Analysis |
title | Online Patient Reviews of Breast Reconstruction: RealSelf Analysis |
title_full | Online Patient Reviews of Breast Reconstruction: RealSelf Analysis |
title_fullStr | Online Patient Reviews of Breast Reconstruction: RealSelf Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Online Patient Reviews of Breast Reconstruction: RealSelf Analysis |
title_short | Online Patient Reviews of Breast Reconstruction: RealSelf Analysis |
title_sort | online patient reviews of breast reconstruction: realself analysis |
topic | Breast |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9682616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36438458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004476 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT phamjasont onlinepatientreviewsofbreastreconstructionrealselfanalysis AT kimjoshuak onlinepatientreviewsofbreastreconstructionrealselfanalysis AT huntstephene onlinepatientreviewsofbreastreconstructionrealselfanalysis AT willettedominiquem onlinepatientreviewsofbreastreconstructionrealselfanalysis AT tangcathyj onlinepatientreviewsofbreastreconstructionrealselfanalysis |