Cargando…

Caring for older men and women: whose caregivers are more distressed? A population-based retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, no population-based studies have examined whether family or friend caregivers of men and women differ in their experience of distress over time. Thus, we aimed to describe, on a population-level and longitudinally, how older men and women care-receivers differed in thei...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Wenshan, Manuel, Douglas G., Isenberg, Sarina R., Tanuseputro, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9682689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36418977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03583-6
_version_ 1784834906232193024
author Li, Wenshan
Manuel, Douglas G.
Isenberg, Sarina R.
Tanuseputro, Peter
author_facet Li, Wenshan
Manuel, Douglas G.
Isenberg, Sarina R.
Tanuseputro, Peter
author_sort Li, Wenshan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, no population-based studies have examined whether family or friend caregivers of men and women differ in their experience of distress over time. Thus, we aimed to describe, on a population-level and longitudinally, how older men and women care-receivers differed in their health and care needs, compare their caregivers’ distress trajectories, and identify factors that contribute to the observed differences. METHODS: This is a population-based, retrospective cohort study using routinely collected data. We examined longitudinally 485,407 community-dwelling Ontario residents, aged over 50 years, who have received at least one Residential Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) assessment between April 2008 and June 2015. Descriptive analyses were performed on the demographic characteristics, health profiles, and care needs of men and women. We also compared their caregivers’ baseline and one-year change in distress status. Logistic regressions were performed to examine if the effect of gender on caregiver distress is reduced after controlling for care-receiver’s health and functional status as well as their caregiver’s kinship and co-residence status. RESULTS: Men (39.5% of our cohort) were frailer, required more care, were mostly cared for by their spouses (52%), and mostly lived with their caregiver (66%). In contrast, women (60.5%) were more likely cared for by their child/child-in-law (60%), less likely to live with caregivers (47%), and received less care. Caregivers of men were more likely to be distressed at baseline (27.7% versus 20.4% of women caregivers) and remain distressed (74.6% versus 69.5%) or become distressed (19.3% versus 14.3%) throughout the year. In logistic regression modelling, the effect of care-receiver’s gender on caregiver distress is reduced from an unadjusted odds ratio of 1.49 (95% CI: 1.47–1.51) to 1.17 (95% CI: 1.15–1.19) when care-receiver’s health and caregiving factors are controlled for. CONCLUSION: Older men and women differed in health and care needs. Caregivers, especially those caring for men, were often distressed and remained so through time. These results highlight the need for policies that account for the differential care needs and caregiver profiles of men and women in order to offer targetted and appropriate support. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-03583-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9682689
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96826892022-11-24 Caring for older men and women: whose caregivers are more distressed? A population-based retrospective cohort study Li, Wenshan Manuel, Douglas G. Isenberg, Sarina R. Tanuseputro, Peter BMC Geriatr Research BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, no population-based studies have examined whether family or friend caregivers of men and women differ in their experience of distress over time. Thus, we aimed to describe, on a population-level and longitudinally, how older men and women care-receivers differed in their health and care needs, compare their caregivers’ distress trajectories, and identify factors that contribute to the observed differences. METHODS: This is a population-based, retrospective cohort study using routinely collected data. We examined longitudinally 485,407 community-dwelling Ontario residents, aged over 50 years, who have received at least one Residential Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) assessment between April 2008 and June 2015. Descriptive analyses were performed on the demographic characteristics, health profiles, and care needs of men and women. We also compared their caregivers’ baseline and one-year change in distress status. Logistic regressions were performed to examine if the effect of gender on caregiver distress is reduced after controlling for care-receiver’s health and functional status as well as their caregiver’s kinship and co-residence status. RESULTS: Men (39.5% of our cohort) were frailer, required more care, were mostly cared for by their spouses (52%), and mostly lived with their caregiver (66%). In contrast, women (60.5%) were more likely cared for by their child/child-in-law (60%), less likely to live with caregivers (47%), and received less care. Caregivers of men were more likely to be distressed at baseline (27.7% versus 20.4% of women caregivers) and remain distressed (74.6% versus 69.5%) or become distressed (19.3% versus 14.3%) throughout the year. In logistic regression modelling, the effect of care-receiver’s gender on caregiver distress is reduced from an unadjusted odds ratio of 1.49 (95% CI: 1.47–1.51) to 1.17 (95% CI: 1.15–1.19) when care-receiver’s health and caregiving factors are controlled for. CONCLUSION: Older men and women differed in health and care needs. Caregivers, especially those caring for men, were often distressed and remained so through time. These results highlight the need for policies that account for the differential care needs and caregiver profiles of men and women in order to offer targetted and appropriate support. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-03583-6. BioMed Central 2022-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9682689/ /pubmed/36418977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03583-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Li, Wenshan
Manuel, Douglas G.
Isenberg, Sarina R.
Tanuseputro, Peter
Caring for older men and women: whose caregivers are more distressed? A population-based retrospective cohort study
title Caring for older men and women: whose caregivers are more distressed? A population-based retrospective cohort study
title_full Caring for older men and women: whose caregivers are more distressed? A population-based retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Caring for older men and women: whose caregivers are more distressed? A population-based retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Caring for older men and women: whose caregivers are more distressed? A population-based retrospective cohort study
title_short Caring for older men and women: whose caregivers are more distressed? A population-based retrospective cohort study
title_sort caring for older men and women: whose caregivers are more distressed? a population-based retrospective cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9682689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36418977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03583-6
work_keys_str_mv AT liwenshan caringforoldermenandwomenwhosecaregiversaremoredistressedapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT manueldouglasg caringforoldermenandwomenwhosecaregiversaremoredistressedapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT isenbergsarinar caringforoldermenandwomenwhosecaregiversaremoredistressedapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT tanuseputropeter caringforoldermenandwomenwhosecaregiversaremoredistressedapopulationbasedretrospectivecohortstudy