Cargando…

Reliability and Validity of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory: A Clinical Study of Questionnaires

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to observe the application of the Chinese version of Tinnitus Handicap Inventory-China in Tinnitus patients and verify its reliability and validity. METHODS: About 1129 patients with tinnitus as the first complaint were selected as subjects. The patients were ran...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Jianning, Huo, Yan, Lui, Guangyu, Li, Ming, Tyler, Richard S., Ping, Huang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Academy of Otology and Neurotology and the Politzer Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9682740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36349675
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/iao.2022.21503
_version_ 1784834919332052992
author Zhang, Jianning
Huo, Yan
Lui, Guangyu
Li, Ming
Tyler, Richard S.
Ping, Huang
author_facet Zhang, Jianning
Huo, Yan
Lui, Guangyu
Li, Ming
Tyler, Richard S.
Ping, Huang
author_sort Zhang, Jianning
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to observe the application of the Chinese version of Tinnitus Handicap Inventory-China in Tinnitus patients and verify its reliability and validity. METHODS: About 1129 patients with tinnitus as the first complaint were selected as subjects. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: exploration group (n = 565), whose data were analyzed with reliability analysis method using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software 19.0, validation group (n = 564), whose data were analyzed with validity analysis method using AMOS21.0. RESULTS: (1) Reliability test: The Cronbach’s α coefficients of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory-China scale in both groups were 0.94, among which, the Cronbach’s α coefficients of functional factor (F), emotion factor (E), and catastrophic factor (C) in group E were 0.87, 0.90, and 0.78, respectively. The half-reliability of the 2 components is 0.87. The correlation coefficient between items and the scale in group E and group V is 0.36-0.78 and 0.33-0.77, respectively. (2) Content validity: The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin value of group E is 0.96, a total of 4 common factors were extracted, and the cumulative interpretation rate is 57.844%. The number of factors with load less than 0.4 on the 4 common factors is only 1 (F24), suggesting that this factor had little significance; the number of factors with load more than 0.4 on the 2 common factors is 8 (F1, E6, F9, C11, F15, E21, E22, and C23), suggesting that patients had different understandings of these 8 questions. (3) Structural validity: The root mean square error of approximation value of the AMOS structural model in group V is 0.065, and the root mean square residual value is 0.114, indicating low fitness; the NC value is 3.353, indicating good fitness of the scale, but it still needed to be simplified. CONCLUSION: The Chinese version of Tinnitus Handicap Inventory-China has a high reliability when applied in China, but the content validity and structure validity are not high, and the clinical practicability needs to be improved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9682740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher European Academy of Otology and Neurotology and the Politzer Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96827402022-12-02 Reliability and Validity of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory: A Clinical Study of Questionnaires Zhang, Jianning Huo, Yan Lui, Guangyu Li, Ming Tyler, Richard S. Ping, Huang J Int Adv Otol Original Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to observe the application of the Chinese version of Tinnitus Handicap Inventory-China in Tinnitus patients and verify its reliability and validity. METHODS: About 1129 patients with tinnitus as the first complaint were selected as subjects. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: exploration group (n = 565), whose data were analyzed with reliability analysis method using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software 19.0, validation group (n = 564), whose data were analyzed with validity analysis method using AMOS21.0. RESULTS: (1) Reliability test: The Cronbach’s α coefficients of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory-China scale in both groups were 0.94, among which, the Cronbach’s α coefficients of functional factor (F), emotion factor (E), and catastrophic factor (C) in group E were 0.87, 0.90, and 0.78, respectively. The half-reliability of the 2 components is 0.87. The correlation coefficient between items and the scale in group E and group V is 0.36-0.78 and 0.33-0.77, respectively. (2) Content validity: The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin value of group E is 0.96, a total of 4 common factors were extracted, and the cumulative interpretation rate is 57.844%. The number of factors with load less than 0.4 on the 4 common factors is only 1 (F24), suggesting that this factor had little significance; the number of factors with load more than 0.4 on the 2 common factors is 8 (F1, E6, F9, C11, F15, E21, E22, and C23), suggesting that patients had different understandings of these 8 questions. (3) Structural validity: The root mean square error of approximation value of the AMOS structural model in group V is 0.065, and the root mean square residual value is 0.114, indicating low fitness; the NC value is 3.353, indicating good fitness of the scale, but it still needed to be simplified. CONCLUSION: The Chinese version of Tinnitus Handicap Inventory-China has a high reliability when applied in China, but the content validity and structure validity are not high, and the clinical practicability needs to be improved. European Academy of Otology and Neurotology and the Politzer Society 2022-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9682740/ /pubmed/36349675 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/iao.2022.21503 Text en 2022 authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhang, Jianning
Huo, Yan
Lui, Guangyu
Li, Ming
Tyler, Richard S.
Ping, Huang
Reliability and Validity of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory: A Clinical Study of Questionnaires
title Reliability and Validity of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory: A Clinical Study of Questionnaires
title_full Reliability and Validity of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory: A Clinical Study of Questionnaires
title_fullStr Reliability and Validity of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory: A Clinical Study of Questionnaires
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and Validity of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory: A Clinical Study of Questionnaires
title_short Reliability and Validity of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory: A Clinical Study of Questionnaires
title_sort reliability and validity of the tinnitus handicap inventory: a clinical study of questionnaires
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9682740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36349675
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/iao.2022.21503
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangjianning reliabilityandvalidityofthetinnitushandicapinventoryaclinicalstudyofquestionnaires
AT huoyan reliabilityandvalidityofthetinnitushandicapinventoryaclinicalstudyofquestionnaires
AT luiguangyu reliabilityandvalidityofthetinnitushandicapinventoryaclinicalstudyofquestionnaires
AT liming reliabilityandvalidityofthetinnitushandicapinventoryaclinicalstudyofquestionnaires
AT tylerrichards reliabilityandvalidityofthetinnitushandicapinventoryaclinicalstudyofquestionnaires
AT pinghuang reliabilityandvalidityofthetinnitushandicapinventoryaclinicalstudyofquestionnaires